Theorem 2sb6rf 2440

Description: Reversed double substitution. (Contributed by NM, 3-Feb-2005.) (Revised by Mario Carneiro, 6-Oct-2016.) Remove variable constraints. (Revised by Wolf Lammen, 28-Sep-2018.)

Hypotheses

Ref	Expression
2sb5rf.1	⊢ Ⅎ𝑧𝜑
2sb5rf.2	⊢ Ⅎ𝑤𝜑

Assertion

Ref	Expression
2sb6rf	⊢ (𝜑 ↔ ∀𝑧∀𝑤((𝑧 = 𝑥 ∧ 𝑤 = 𝑦) → [𝑧 / 𝑥][𝑤 / 𝑦]𝜑))

Distinct variable group:   𝑧,𝑤

Allowed substitution hints:   𝜑(𝑥,𝑦,𝑧,𝑤)

Proof of Theorem 2sb6rf

Step	Hyp	Ref	Expression
1		sbequ12r 2098	. . . . 5 ⊢ (𝑧 = 𝑥 → ([𝑧 / 𝑥][𝑤 / 𝑦]𝜑 ↔ [𝑤 / 𝑦]𝜑))
2		sbequ12r 2098	. . . . 5 ⊢ (𝑤 = 𝑦 → ([𝑤 / 𝑦]𝜑 ↔ 𝜑))
3	1, 2	sylan9bb 732	. . . 4 ⊢ ((𝑧 = 𝑥 ∧ 𝑤 = 𝑦) → ([𝑧 / 𝑥][𝑤 / 𝑦]𝜑 ↔ 𝜑))
4	3	pm5.74i 259	. . 3 ⊢ (((𝑧 = 𝑥 ∧ 𝑤 = 𝑦) → [𝑧 / 𝑥][𝑤 / 𝑦]𝜑) ↔ ((𝑧 = 𝑥 ∧ 𝑤 = 𝑦) → 𝜑))
5	4	2albii 1738	. 2 ⊢ (∀𝑧∀𝑤((𝑧 = 𝑥 ∧ 𝑤 = 𝑦) → [𝑧 / 𝑥][𝑤 / 𝑦]𝜑) ↔ ∀𝑧∀𝑤((𝑧 = 𝑥 ∧ 𝑤 = 𝑦) → 𝜑))
6		2sb5rf.2	. . . . 5 ⊢ Ⅎ𝑤𝜑
7	6	19.23 2067	. . . 4 ⊢ (∀𝑤((𝑧 = 𝑥 ∧ 𝑤 = 𝑦) → 𝜑) ↔ (∃𝑤(𝑧 = 𝑥 ∧ 𝑤 = 𝑦) → 𝜑))
8	7	albii 1737	. . 3 ⊢ (∀𝑧∀𝑤((𝑧 = 𝑥 ∧ 𝑤 = 𝑦) → 𝜑) ↔ ∀𝑧(∃𝑤(𝑧 = 𝑥 ∧ 𝑤 = 𝑦) → 𝜑))
9		2sb5rf.1	. . . 4 ⊢ Ⅎ𝑧𝜑
10	9	19.23 2067	. . 3 ⊢ (∀𝑧(∃𝑤(𝑧 = 𝑥 ∧ 𝑤 = 𝑦) → 𝜑) ↔ (∃𝑧∃𝑤(𝑧 = 𝑥 ∧ 𝑤 = 𝑦) → 𝜑))
11	8, 10	bitri 263	. 2 ⊢ (∀𝑧∀𝑤((𝑧 = 𝑥 ∧ 𝑤 = 𝑦) → 𝜑) ↔ (∃𝑧∃𝑤(𝑧 = 𝑥 ∧ 𝑤 = 𝑦) → 𝜑))
12		2ax6e 2438	. . 3 ⊢ ∃𝑧∃𝑤(𝑧 = 𝑥 ∧ 𝑤 = 𝑦)
13		pm5.5 350	. . 3 ⊢ (∃𝑧∃𝑤(𝑧 = 𝑥 ∧ 𝑤 = 𝑦) → ((∃𝑧∃𝑤(𝑧 = 𝑥 ∧ 𝑤 = 𝑦) → 𝜑) ↔ 𝜑))
14	12, 13	ax-mp 5	. 2 ⊢ ((∃𝑧∃𝑤(𝑧 = 𝑥 ∧ 𝑤 = 𝑦) → 𝜑) ↔ 𝜑)
15	5, 11, 14	3bitrri 286	1 ⊢ (𝜑 ↔ ∀𝑧∀𝑤((𝑧 = 𝑥 ∧ 𝑤 = 𝑦) → [𝑧 / 𝑥][𝑤 / 𝑦]𝜑))

Syntax hints:   → wi 4   ↔ wb 195   ∧ wa 383  ∀wal 1473  ∃wex 1695  Ⅎwnf 1699  [wsb 1867

This theorem was proved from axioms:  ax-mp 5  ax-1 6  ax-2 7  ax-3 8  ax-gen 1713  ax-4 1728  ax-5 1827  ax-6 1875  ax-7 1922  ax-10 2006  ax-11 2021  ax-12 2034  ax-13 2234

This theorem depends on definitions:  df-bi 196  df-or 384  df-an 385  df-tru 1478  df-ex 1696  df-nf 1701  df-sb 1868

This theorem is referenced by: (None)