| Metamath Proof Explorer |
< Previous
Next >
Related theorems Unicode version |
| Description: A syllogism rule of inference. The second premise is used to replace the third antecedent of the first premise. |
| Ref | Expression |
|---|---|
| syl7.1 |
|
| syl7.2 |
|
| Ref | Expression |
|---|---|
| syl7 |
|
| Step | Hyp | Ref | Expression |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | syl7.1 |
. 2
| |
| 2 | syl7.2 |
. . 3
| |
| 3 | 2 | imim1i 19 |
. 2
|
| 4 | 1, 3 | syl6 25 |
1
|
| Colors of variables: wff set class |
| Syntax hints: |
| This theorem is referenced by: syl7ib 233 syl3an3 1132 ee13 1275 hbae 1505 ax11 1589 a12study 1769 vtoclegft 2356 uniiunlem 2693 tz7.7 3684 f1oweALT 4883 nneneq 5606 r1ord 5766 ltbtwnpq 6236 nnunb 7279 iscms2lem5 9271 findcardOLD 10179 atcvat4i 11969 mdsymlem5 11979 sumdmdii 11987 ndvdssub 13710 dfon2lem6 13854 wfrlem12 13968 unpde2eg2 14406 lvsovso 15038 icmpmon 15165 cnpfillim 15589 fmfnfmlem4 15597 erdisj3 16266 cvrat4 17076 |
| This theorem was proved from axioms: ax-1 4 ax-2 5 ax-mp 7 |