HomeHome Metamath Proof Explorer < Previous   Next >
Related theorems
Unicode version

Theorem sbiedOLD 1564
Description: Conversion of implicit substitution to explicit substitution (deduction version of sbie 1565).
Hypotheses
Ref Expression
sbied.1 |- (ph -> A.xph)
sbied.2 |- (ph -> (ch -> A.xch))
sbied.3 |- (ph -> (x = y -> (ps <-> ch)))
Assertion
Ref Expression
sbiedOLD |- (ph -> ([y / x]ps <-> ch))

Proof of Theorem sbiedOLD
StepHypRef Expression
1 sbied.1 . . 3 |- (ph -> A.xph)
2 sbied.3 . . . . . . . . 9 |- (ph -> (x = y -> (ps <-> ch)))
3 bi1 165 . . . . . . . . 9 |- ((ps <-> ch) -> (ps -> ch))
42, 3syl6 25 . . . . . . . 8 |- (ph -> (x = y -> (ps -> ch)))
54imp3a 388 . . . . . . 7 |- (ph -> ((x = y /\ ps) -> ch))
65alimi 1338 . . . . . 6 |- (A.xph -> A.x((x = y /\ ps) -> ch))
7 exim 1386 . . . . . 6 |- (A.x((x = y /\ ps) -> ch) -> (E.x(x = y /\ ps) -> E.xch))
86, 7syl 12 . . . . 5 |- (A.xph -> (E.x(x = y /\ ps) -> E.xch))
9 sb1 1540 . . . . 5 |- ([y / x]ps -> E.x(x = y /\ ps))
108, 9syl5 20 . . . 4 |- (A.xph -> ([y / x]ps -> E.xch))
11 sbied.2 . . . . . . 7 |- (ph -> (ch -> A.xch))
1211alimi 1338 . . . . . 6 |- (A.xph -> A.x(ch -> A.xch))
13 hba1 1350 . . . . . . 7 |- (A.xch -> A.xA.xch)
141319.23 1411 . . . . . 6 |- (A.x(ch -> A.xch) <-> (E.xch -> A.xch))
1512, 14sylib 215 . . . . 5 |- (A.xph -> (E.xch -> A.xch))
16 ax-4 1319 . . . . 5 |- (A.xch -> ch)
1715, 16syl6 25 . . . 4 |- (A.xph -> (E.xch -> ch))
1810, 17syld 30 . . 3 |- (A.xph -> ([y / x]ps -> ch))
191, 18syl 12 . 2 |- (ph -> ([y / x]ps -> ch))
20 bi2 166 . . . . . . 7 |- ((ps <-> ch) -> (ch -> ps))
212, 20syl6 25 . . . . . 6 |- (ph -> (x = y -> (ch -> ps)))
2221com23 36 . . . . 5 |- (ph -> (ch -> (x = y -> ps)))
2322al2imi 1341 . . . 4 |- (A.xph -> (A.xch -> A.x(x = y -> ps)))
24 sb2 1541 . . . 4 |- (A.x(x = y -> ps) -> [y / x]ps)
2523, 24syl6 25 . . 3 |- (A.xph -> (A.xch -> [y / x]ps))
261, 11, 25sylsyld 32 . 2 |- (ph -> (ch -> [y / x]ps))
2719, 26impbid 574 1 |- (ph -> ([y / x]ps <-> ch))
Colors of variables: wff set class
Syntax hints:   -> wi 3   <-> wb 163   /\ wa 240  A.wal 1296   = wceq 1298  E.wex 1326  [wsbc 1534
This theorem was proved from axioms:  ax-1 4  ax-2 5  ax-3 6  ax-mp 7  ax-gen 1305  ax-4 1319  ax-5o 1321  ax-6o 1324  ax-9o 1481
This theorem depends on definitions:  df-bi 164  df-an 242  df-ex 1327  df-sb 1536
Copyright terms: Public domain