HomeHome Metamath Proof Explorer < Previous   Next >
Related theorems
Unicode version

Theorem sb56 1643
Description: Two equivalent ways of expressing the proper substitution of y for x in ph, when x and y are distinct. Theorem 6.2 of [Quine] p. 40. The proof does not involve df-sb 1536.
Assertion
Ref Expression
sb56 |- (E.x(x = y /\ ph) <-> A.x(x = y -> ph))
Distinct variable group:   x,y

Proof of Theorem sb56
StepHypRef Expression
1 hba1 1350 . 2 |- (A.x(x = y -> ph) -> A.xA.x(x = y -> ph))
2 ax11v 1642 . . 3 |- (x = y -> (ph -> A.x(x = y -> ph)))
3 ax-4 1319 . . . 4 |- (A.x(x = y -> ph) -> (x = y -> ph))
43com12 14 . . 3 |- (x = y -> (A.x(x = y -> ph) -> ph))
52, 4impbid 574 . 2 |- (x = y -> (ph <-> A.x(x = y -> ph)))
61, 5equsex 1513 1 |- (E.x(x = y /\ ph) <-> A.x(x = y -> ph))
Colors of variables: wff set class
Syntax hints:   -> wi 3   <-> wb 163   /\ wa 240  A.wal 1296   = wceq 1298  E.wex 1326
This theorem is referenced by:  sb6 1644  sb5 1645  alexeq 2390  pm13.196a 16378
This theorem was proved from axioms:  ax-1 4  ax-2 5  ax-3 6  ax-mp 7  ax-gen 1305  ax-4 1319  ax-5o 1321  ax-6o 1324  ax-9o 1481  ax-16 1580  ax-11o 1588
This theorem depends on definitions:  df-bi 164  df-an 242  df-ex 1327
Copyright terms: Public domain