Theorem resoprab 6291

Description: Restriction of an operation class abstraction. (Contributed by NM, 10-Feb-2007.)

Assertion

Ref	Expression
resoprab	|- ( { <. <. x , y >. , z >. | ph } |` ( A X. B ) ) = { <. <. x , y >. , z >. | ( ( x e. A /\ y e. B ) /\ ph ) }

Distinct variable groups:   x, y, z, A   x, B, y, z

Allowed substitution hints:   ph( x, y, z)

Proof of Theorem resoprab

Dummy variable w is distinct from all other variables.

Step	Hyp	Ref	Expression
1		resopab 5256	. . 3 |- ( { <. w , z >. | E. x E. y ( w = <. x , y >. /\ ph ) } |` ( A X. B ) ) = { <. w , z >. | ( w e. ( A X. B ) /\ E. x E. y ( w = <. x , y >. /\ ph ) ) }
2		19.42vv 1937	. . . . 5 |- ( E. x E. y ( w e. ( A X. B ) /\ ( w = <. x , y >. /\ ph ) ) <-> ( w e. ( A X. B ) /\ E. x E. y ( w = <. x , y >. /\ ph ) ) )
3		an12 795	. . . . . . 7 |- ( ( w e. ( A X. B ) /\ ( w = <. x , y >. /\ ph ) ) <-> ( w = <. x , y >. /\ ( w e. ( A X. B ) /\ ph ) ) )
4		eleq1 2524	. . . . . . . . . 10 |- ( w = <. x , y >. -> ( w e. ( A X. B ) <-> <. x , y >. e. ( A X. B ) ) )
5		opelxp 4972	. . . . . . . . . 10 |- ( <. x , y >. e. ( A X. B ) <-> ( x e. A /\ y e. B ) )
6	4, 5	syl6bb 261	. . . . . . . . 9 |- ( w = <. x , y >. -> ( w e. ( A X. B ) <-> ( x e. A /\ y e. B ) ) )
7	6	anbi1d 704	. . . . . . . 8 |- ( w = <. x , y >. -> ( ( w e. ( A X. B ) /\ ph ) <-> ( ( x e. A /\ y e. B ) /\ ph ) ) )
8	7	pm5.32i 637	. . . . . . 7 |- ( ( w = <. x , y >. /\ ( w e. ( A X. B ) /\ ph ) ) <-> ( w = <. x , y >. /\ ( ( x e. A /\ y e. B ) /\ ph ) ) )
9	3, 8	bitri 249	. . . . . 6 |- ( ( w e. ( A X. B ) /\ ( w = <. x , y >. /\ ph ) ) <-> ( w = <. x , y >. /\ ( ( x e. A /\ y e. B ) /\ ph ) ) )
10	9	2exbii 1636	. . . . 5 |- ( E. x E. y ( w e. ( A X. B ) /\ ( w = <. x , y >. /\ ph ) ) <-> E. x E. y ( w = <. x , y >. /\ ( ( x e. A /\ y e. B ) /\ ph ) ) )
11	2, 10	bitr3i 251	. . . 4 |- ( ( w e. ( A X. B ) /\ E. x E. y ( w = <. x , y >. /\ ph ) ) <-> E. x E. y ( w = <. x , y >. /\ ( ( x e. A /\ y e. B ) /\ ph ) ) )
12	11	opabbii 4459	. . 3 |- { <. w , z >. | ( w e. ( A X. B ) /\ E. x E. y ( w = <. x , y >. /\ ph ) ) } = { <. w , z >. | E. x E. y ( w = <. x , y >. /\ ( ( x e. A /\ y e. B ) /\ ph ) ) }
13	1, 12	eqtri 2481	. 2 |- ( { <. w , z >. | E. x E. y ( w = <. x , y >. /\ ph ) } |` ( A X. B ) ) = { <. w , z >. | E. x E. y ( w = <. x , y >. /\ ( ( x e. A /\ y e. B ) /\ ph ) ) }
14		dfoprab2 6237	. . 3 |- { <. <. x , y >. , z >. | ph } = { <. w , z >. | E. x E. y ( w = <. x , y >. /\ ph ) }
15	14	reseq1i 5209	. 2 |- ( { <. <. x , y >. , z >. | ph } |` ( A X. B ) ) = ( { <. w , z >. | E. x E. y ( w = <. x , y >. /\ ph ) } |` ( A X. B ) )
16		dfoprab2 6237	. 2 |- { <. <. x , y >. , z >. | ( ( x e. A /\ y e. B ) /\ ph ) } = { <. w , z >. | E. x E. y ( w = <. x , y >. /\ ( ( x e. A /\ y e. B ) /\ ph ) ) }
17	13, 15, 16	3eqtr4i 2491	1 |- ( { <. <. x , y >. , z >. | ph } |` ( A X. B ) ) = { <. <. x , y >. , z >. | ( ( x e. A /\ y e. B ) /\ ph ) }

Syntax hints:   /\ wa 369   = wceq 1370   E.wex 1587   e. wcel 1758   <.cop 3986   {copab 4452   X. cxp 4941   |` cres 4945   {coprab 6196

This theorem was proved from axioms:  ax-mp 5  ax-1 6  ax-2 7  ax-3 8  ax-gen 1592  ax-4 1603  ax-5 1671  ax-6 1710  ax-7 1730  ax-9 1762  ax-10 1777  ax-11 1782  ax-12 1794  ax-13 1954  ax-ext 2431  ax-sep 4516  ax-nul 4524  ax-pr 4634

This theorem depends on definitions:  df-bi 185  df-or 370  df-an 371  df-3an 967  df-tru 1373  df-ex 1588  df-nf 1591  df-sb 1703  df-clab 2438  df-cleq 2444  df-clel 2447  df-nfc 2602  df-ne 2647  df-ral 2801  df-rex 2802  df-rab 2805  df-v 3074  df-dif 3434  df-un 3436  df-in 3438  df-ss 3445  df-nul 3741  df-if 3895  df-sn 3981  df-pr 3983  df-op 3987  df-opab 4454  df-xp 4949  df-rel 4950  df-res 4955  df-oprab 6199

This theorem is referenced by:  resoprab2  6292  df1stres  26145  df2ndres  26146