HomeHome Metamath Proof Explorer < Previous   Next >
Related theorems
Unicode version

Theorem rdglim2 2987
Description: The value of the recursive definition generator at a limit ordinal, in terms of the union of all smaller values.
Assertion
Ref Expression
rdglim2 |- ((B e. C /\ Lim B) -> (rec(F, A)` B) = U.{y | E.x e. B y = (rec(F, A)` x)})
Distinct variable group(s):   x,y,A   x,B,y   x,F,y

Proof of Theorem rdglim2
StepHypRef Expression
1 rdglimt 2986 . 2 |- ((B e. C /\ Lim B) -> (rec(F, A)` B) = U.(rec(F, A)"B))
2 limord 2283 . . . . . . . . . . 11 |- (Lim B -> Ord B)
3 ordelord 2221 . . . . . . . . . . . . 13 |- ((Ord B /\ x e. B) -> Ord x)
43exp 291 . . . . . . . . . . . 12 |- (Ord B -> (x e. B -> Ord x))
5 visset 1350 . . . . . . . . . . . . 13 |- x e. V
65elon 2208 . . . . . . . . . . . 12 |- (x e. On <-> Ord x)
74, 6syl6ibr 186 . . . . . . . . . . 11 |- (Ord B -> (x e. B -> x e. On))
82, 7syl 12 . . . . . . . . . 10 |- (Lim B -> (x e. B -> x e. On))
9 rdgfnon 2977 . . . . . . . . . . . 12 |- rec(F, A) Fn On
10 visset 1350 . . . . . . . . . . . . 13 |- y e. V
1110fnfvop 2856 . . . . . . . . . . . 12 |- ((rec(F, A) Fn On /\ x e. On) -> ((rec(F, A)` x) = y <-> <.x, y>. e. rec(F, A)))
129, 11mpan 518 . . . . . . . . . . 11 |- (x e. On -> ((rec(F, A)` x) = y <-> <.x, y>. e. rec(F, A)))
13 cleqcom 1103 . . . . . . . . . . 11 |- (y = (rec(F, A)` x) <-> (rec(F, A)` x) = y)
1412, 13syl5bb 410 . . . . . . . . . 10 |- (x e. On -> (y = (rec(F, A)` x) <-> <.x, y>. e. rec(F, A)))
158, 14syl6 23 . . . . . . . . 9 |- (Lim B -> (x e. B -> (y = (rec(F, A)` x) <-> <.x, y>. e. rec(F, A))))
1615pm5.32d 491 . . . . . . . 8 |- (Lim B -> ((x e. B /\ y = (rec(F, A)` x)) <-> (x e. B /\ <.x, y>. e. rec(F, A))))
1716biexdv 936 . . . . . . 7 |- (Lim B -> (E.x(x e. B /\ y = (rec(F, A)` x)) <-> E.x(x e. B /\ <.x, y>. e. rec(F, A))))
18 df-rex 1206 . . . . . . 7 |- (E.x e. B y = (rec(F, A)` x) <-> E.x(x e. B /\ y = (rec(F, A)` x)))
1917, 18syl5rbb 411 . . . . . 6 |- (Lim B -> (E.x(x e. B /\ <.x, y>. e. rec(F, A)) <-> E.x e. B y = (rec(F, A)` x)))
2019biabdv 1183 . . . . 5 |- (Lim B -> {y | E.x(x e. B /\ <.x, y>. e. rec(F, A))} = {y | E.x e. B y = (rec(F, A)` x)})
21 dfima3 2605 . . . . 5 |- (rec(F, A)"B) = {y | E.x(x e. B /\ <.x, y>. e. rec(F, A))}
2220, 21syl5eq 1136 . . . 4 |- (Lim B -> (rec(F, A)"B) = {y | E.x e. B y = (rec(F, A)` x)})
2322unieqd 1929 . . 3 |- (Lim B -> U.(rec(F, A)"B) = U.{y | E.x e. B y = (rec(F, A)` x)})
2423adantl 305 . 2 |- ((B e. C /\ Lim B) -> U.(rec(F, A)"B) = U.{y | E.x e. B y = (rec(F, A)` x)})
251, 24eqtrd 1128 1 |- ((B e. C /\ Lim B) -> (rec(F, A)` B) = U.{y | E.x e. B y = (rec(F, A)` x)})
Colors of variables: wff set class
Syntax hints:   -> wi 2   <-> wb 127   /\ wa 196  E.wex 678  {cab 1090   = wceq 1091   e. wcel 1092  E.wrex 1202  <.cop 1810  U.cuni 1919  Ord word 2198  Oncon0 2199  Lim wlim 2200  "cima 2413   Fn wfn 2417  ` cfv 2422  reccrdg 2969
This theorem is referenced by:  rdglim2a 2988
This theorem was proved from axioms:  ax-1 3  ax-2 4  ax-3 5  ax-mp 6  ax-4 673  ax-5 674  ax-6 675  ax-7 676  ax-gen 677  ax-8 798  ax-9 799  ax-10 800  ax-11 801  ax-12 802  ax-13 804  ax-14 805  ax-16 922  ax-17 925  ax-ext 1074  ax-rep 1075  ax-un 1076  ax-pow 1077
This theorem depends on definitions:  df-bi 128  df-or 197  df-an 198  df-3or 582  df-3an 583  df-ex 679  df-sb 853  df-eu 1009  df-mo 1010  df-clab 1093  df-cleq 1097  df-clel 1099  df-ral 1205  df-rex 1206  df-rab 1208  df-v 1349  df-sbc 1441  df-dif 1489  df-un 1490  df-in 1491  df-ss 1492  df-nul 1708  df-if 1777  df-pw 1799  df-sn 1811  df-pr 1812  df-tp 1814  df-op 1815  df-uni 1920  df-tr 2042  df-br 2063  df-opab 2098  df-eprel 2122  df-id 2125  df-po 2128  df-so 2138  df-fr 2169  df-we 2186  df-ord 2202  df-on 2203  df-lim 2204  df-suc 2205  df-xp 2424  df-rel 2425  df-cnv 2426  df-co 2427  df-dm 2428  df-rn 2429  df-res 2430  df-ima 2431  df-fun 2432  df-fn 2433  df-fv 2438  df-rdg 2970
metamath.org