MPE Home Metamath Proof Explorer < Previous   Next >
Nearby theorems
Mirrors  >  Home  >  MPE Home  >  Th. List  >  nna0r Structured version   Unicode version

Theorem nna0r 7250
Description: Addition to zero. Remark in proof of Theorem 4K(2) of [Enderton] p. 81. Note: In this and later theorems, we deliberately avoid the more general ordinal versions of these theorems (in this case oa0r 7180) so that we can avoid ax-rep 4550, which is not needed for finite recursive definitions. (Contributed by NM, 20-Sep-1995.) (Revised by Mario Carneiro, 14-Nov-2014.)
Assertion
Ref Expression
nna0r  |-  ( A  e.  om  ->  ( (/) 
+o  A )  =  A )

Proof of Theorem nna0r
Dummy variables  x  y are mutually distinct and distinct from all other variables.
StepHypRef Expression
1 oveq2 6278 . . 3  |-  ( x  =  (/)  ->  ( (/)  +o  x )  =  (
(/)  +o  (/) ) )
2 id 22 . . 3  |-  ( x  =  (/)  ->  x  =  (/) )
31, 2eqeq12d 2476 . 2  |-  ( x  =  (/)  ->  ( (
(/)  +o  x )  =  x  <->  ( (/)  +o  (/) )  =  (/) ) )
4 oveq2 6278 . . 3  |-  ( x  =  y  ->  ( (/) 
+o  x )  =  ( (/)  +o  y
) )
5 id 22 . . 3  |-  ( x  =  y  ->  x  =  y )
64, 5eqeq12d 2476 . 2  |-  ( x  =  y  ->  (
( (/)  +o  x )  =  x  <->  ( (/)  +o  y
)  =  y ) )
7 oveq2 6278 . . 3  |-  ( x  =  suc  y  -> 
( (/)  +o  x )  =  ( (/)  +o  suc  y ) )
8 id 22 . . 3  |-  ( x  =  suc  y  ->  x  =  suc  y )
97, 8eqeq12d 2476 . 2  |-  ( x  =  suc  y  -> 
( ( (/)  +o  x
)  =  x  <->  ( (/)  +o  suc  y )  =  suc  y ) )
10 oveq2 6278 . . 3  |-  ( x  =  A  ->  ( (/) 
+o  x )  =  ( (/)  +o  A
) )
11 id 22 . . 3  |-  ( x  =  A  ->  x  =  A )
1210, 11eqeq12d 2476 . 2  |-  ( x  =  A  ->  (
( (/)  +o  x )  =  x  <->  ( (/)  +o  A
)  =  A ) )
13 0elon 4920 . . 3  |-  (/)  e.  On
14 oa0 7158 . . 3  |-  ( (/)  e.  On  ->  ( (/)  +o  (/) )  =  (/) )
1513, 14ax-mp 5 . 2  |-  ( (/)  +o  (/) )  =  (/)
16 peano1 6692 . . . 4  |-  (/)  e.  om
17 nnasuc 7247 . . . 4  |-  ( (
(/)  e.  om  /\  y  e.  om )  ->  ( (/) 
+o  suc  y )  =  suc  ( (/)  +o  y
) )
1816, 17mpan 668 . . 3  |-  ( y  e.  om  ->  ( (/) 
+o  suc  y )  =  suc  ( (/)  +o  y
) )
19 suceq 4932 . . . 4  |-  ( (
(/)  +o  y )  =  y  ->  suc  ( (/) 
+o  y )  =  suc  y )
2019eqeq2d 2468 . . 3  |-  ( (
(/)  +o  y )  =  y  ->  ( (
(/)  +o  suc  y )  =  suc  ( (/)  +o  y )  <->  ( (/)  +o  suc  y )  =  suc  y ) )
2118, 20syl5ibcom 220 . 2  |-  ( y  e.  om  ->  (
( (/)  +o  y )  =  y  ->  ( (/) 
+o  suc  y )  =  suc  y ) )
223, 6, 9, 12, 15, 21finds 6699 1  |-  ( A  e.  om  ->  ( (/) 
+o  A )  =  A )
Colors of variables: wff setvar class
Syntax hints:    -> wi 4    = wceq 1398    e. wcel 1823   (/)c0 3783   Oncon0 4867   suc csuc 4869  (class class class)co 6270   omcom 6673    +o coa 7119
This theorem was proved from axioms:  ax-mp 5  ax-1 6  ax-2 7  ax-3 8  ax-gen 1623  ax-4 1636  ax-5 1709  ax-6 1752  ax-7 1795  ax-8 1825  ax-9 1827  ax-10 1842  ax-11 1847  ax-12 1859  ax-13 2004  ax-ext 2432  ax-sep 4560  ax-nul 4568  ax-pow 4615  ax-pr 4676  ax-un 6565
This theorem depends on definitions:  df-bi 185  df-or 368  df-an 369  df-3or 972  df-3an 973  df-tru 1401  df-ex 1618  df-nf 1622  df-sb 1745  df-eu 2288  df-mo 2289  df-clab 2440  df-cleq 2446  df-clel 2449  df-nfc 2604  df-ne 2651  df-ral 2809  df-rex 2810  df-reu 2811  df-rab 2813  df-v 3108  df-sbc 3325  df-csb 3421  df-dif 3464  df-un 3466  df-in 3468  df-ss 3475  df-pss 3477  df-nul 3784  df-if 3930  df-pw 4001  df-sn 4017  df-pr 4019  df-tp 4021  df-op 4023  df-uni 4236  df-iun 4317  df-br 4440  df-opab 4498  df-mpt 4499  df-tr 4533  df-eprel 4780  df-id 4784  df-po 4789  df-so 4790  df-fr 4827  df-we 4829  df-ord 4870  df-on 4871  df-lim 4872  df-suc 4873  df-xp 4994  df-rel 4995  df-cnv 4996  df-co 4997  df-dm 4998  df-rn 4999  df-res 5000  df-ima 5001  df-iota 5534  df-fun 5572  df-fn 5573  df-f 5574  df-f1 5575  df-fo 5576  df-f1o 5577  df-fv 5578  df-ov 6273  df-oprab 6274  df-mpt2 6275  df-om 6674  df-recs 7034  df-rdg 7068  df-oadd 7126
This theorem is referenced by:  nnacom  7258  nnm1  7289
  Copyright terms: Public domain W3C validator