P. 32 of Theorem List - Metamath Proof Explorer

Theorem List for Metamath Proof Explorer - 3101-3200   *Has distinct variable group(s)

Type	Label	Description
Statement
Theorem	vtocl2ga 3101*	Implicit substitution of 2 classes for 2 setvar variables. (Contributed by NM, 20-Aug-1995.)
|- ( x = A -> ( ph <-> ps ) )   &    |- ( y = B -> ( ps <-> ch ) )   &    |- ( ( x e. C /\ y e. D ) -> ph )   =>    |- ( ( A e. C /\ B e. D ) -> ch )
Theorem	vtocl3gaf 3102*	Implicit substitution of 3 classes for 3 setvar variables. (Contributed by NM, 10-Aug-2013.) (Revised by Mario Carneiro, 11-Oct-2016.)
|- F/_ x A   &    |- F/_ y A   &    |- F/_ z A   &    |- F/_ y B   &    |- F/_ z B   &    |- F/_ z C   &    |- F/ x ps   &    |- F/ y ch   &    |- F/ z th   &    |- ( x = A -> ( ph <-> ps ) )   &    |- ( y = B -> ( ps <-> ch ) )   &    |- ( z = C -> ( ch <-> th ) )   &    |- ( ( x e. R /\ y e. S /\ z e. T ) -> ph )   =>    |- ( ( A e. R /\ B e. S /\ C e. T ) -> th )
Theorem	vtocl3ga 3103*	Implicit substitution of 3 classes for 3 setvar variables. (Contributed by NM, 20-Aug-1995.)
|- ( x = A -> ( ph <-> ps ) )   &    |- ( y = B -> ( ps <-> ch ) )   &    |- ( z = C -> ( ch <-> th ) )   &    |- ( ( x e. D /\ y e. R /\ z e. S ) -> ph )   =>    |- ( ( A e. D /\ B e. R /\ C e. S ) -> th )
Theorem	vtocl4g 3104*	Implicit substitution of 4 classes for 4 setvar variables. (Contributed by AV, 22-Jan-2019.)
|- ( x = A -> ( ph <-> ps ) )   &    |- ( y = B -> ( ps <-> ch ) )   &    |- ( z = C -> ( ch <-> rh ) )   &    |- ( w = D -> ( rh <-> th ) )   &    |- ph   =>    |- ( ( ( A e. Q /\ B e. R ) /\ ( C e. S /\ D e. T ) ) -> th )
Theorem	vtocl4ga 3105*	Implicit substitution of 4 classes for 4 setvar variables. (Contributed by AV, 22-Jan-2019.)
|- ( x = A -> ( ph <-> ps ) )   &    |- ( y = B -> ( ps <-> ch ) )   &    |- ( z = C -> ( ch <-> rh ) )   &    |- ( w = D -> ( rh <-> th ) )   &    |- ( ( ( x e. Q /\ y e. R ) /\ ( z e. S /\ w e. T ) ) -> ph )   =>    |- ( ( ( A e. Q /\ B e. R ) /\ ( C e. S /\ D e. T ) ) -> th )
Theorem	vtocleg 3106*	Implicit substitution of a class for a setvar variable. (Contributed by NM, 21-Jun-1993.)
|- ( x = A -> ph )   =>    |- ( A e. V -> ph )
Theorem	vtoclegft 3107*	Implicit substitution of a class for a setvar variable. (Closed theorem version of vtoclef 3108.) (Contributed by NM, 7-Nov-2005.) (Revised by Mario Carneiro, 11-Oct-2016.)
|- ( ( A e. B /\ F/ x ph /\ A. x ( x = A -> ph ) ) -> ph )
Theorem	vtoclef 3108*	Implicit substitution of a class for a setvar variable. (Contributed by NM, 18-Aug-1993.)
|- F/ x ph   &    |- A e. _V   &    |- ( x = A -> ph )   =>    |- ph
Theorem	vtocle 3109*	Implicit substitution of a class for a setvar variable. (Contributed by NM, 9-Sep-1993.)
|- A e. _V   &    |- ( x = A -> ph )   =>    |- ph
Theorem	vtoclri 3110*	Implicit substitution of a class for a setvar variable. (Contributed by NM, 21-Nov-1994.)
|- ( x = A -> ( ph <-> ps ) )   &    |- A. x e. B ph   =>    |- ( A e. B -> ps )
Theorem	spcimgft 3111	A closed version of spcimgf 3113. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 4-Jan-2017.)
|- F/ x ps   &    |- F/_ x A   =>    |- ( A. x ( x = A -> ( ph -> ps ) ) -> ( A e. B -> ( A. x ph -> ps ) ) )
Theorem	spcgft 3112	A closed version of spcgf 3115. (Contributed by Andrew Salmon, 6-Jun-2011.) (Revised by Mario Carneiro, 4-Jan-2017.)
|- F/ x ps   &    |- F/_ x A   =>    |- ( A. x ( x = A -> ( ph <-> ps ) ) -> ( A e. B -> ( A. x ph -> ps ) ) )
Theorem	spcimgf 3113	Rule of specialization, using implicit substitution. Compare Theorem 7.3 of [Quine] p. 44. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 4-Jan-2017.)
|- F/_ x A   &    |- F/ x ps   &    |- ( x = A -> ( ph -> ps ) )   =>    |- ( A e. V -> ( A. x ph -> ps ) )
Theorem	spcimegf 3114	Existential specialization, using implicit substitution. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 4-Jan-2017.)
|- F/_ x A   &    |- F/ x ps   &    |- ( x = A -> ( ps -> ph ) )   =>    |- ( A e. V -> ( ps -> E. x ph ) )
Theorem	spcgf 3115	Rule of specialization, using implicit substitution. Compare Theorem 7.3 of [Quine] p. 44. (Contributed by NM, 2-Feb-1997.) (Revised by Andrew Salmon, 12-Aug-2011.)
|- F/_ x A   &    |- F/ x ps   &    |- ( x = A -> ( ph <-> ps ) )   =>    |- ( A e. V -> ( A. x ph -> ps ) )
Theorem	spcegf 3116	Existential specialization, using implicit substitution. (Contributed by NM, 2-Feb-1997.)
|- F/_ x A   &    |- F/ x ps   &    |- ( x = A -> ( ph <-> ps ) )   =>    |- ( A e. V -> ( ps -> E. x ph ) )
Theorem	spcimdv 3117*	Restricted specialization, using implicit substitution. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 4-Jan-2017.)
|- ( ph -> A e. B )   &    |- ( ( ph /\ x = A ) -> ( ps -> ch ) )   =>    |- ( ph -> ( A. x ps -> ch ) )
Theorem	spcdv 3118*	Rule of specialization, using implicit substitution. Analogous to rspcdv 3139. (Contributed by David Moews, 1-May-2017.)
|- ( ph -> A e. B )   &    |- ( ( ph /\ x = A ) -> ( ps <-> ch ) )   =>    |- ( ph -> ( A. x ps -> ch ) )
Theorem	spcimedv 3119*	Restricted existential specialization, using implicit substitution. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 4-Jan-2017.)
|- ( ph -> A e. B )   &    |- ( ( ph /\ x = A ) -> ( ch -> ps ) )   =>    |- ( ph -> ( ch -> E. x ps ) )
Theorem	spcgv 3120*	Rule of specialization, using implicit substitution. Compare Theorem 7.3 of [Quine] p. 44. (Contributed by NM, 22-Jun-1994.)
|- ( x = A -> ( ph <-> ps ) )   =>    |- ( A e. V -> ( A. x ph -> ps ) )
Theorem	spcegv 3121*	Existential specialization, using implicit substitution. (Contributed by NM, 14-Aug-1994.)
|- ( x = A -> ( ph <-> ps ) )   =>    |- ( A e. V -> ( ps -> E. x ph ) )
Theorem	spc2egv 3122*	Existential specialization with two quantifiers, using implicit substitution. (Contributed by NM, 3-Aug-1995.)
|- ( ( x = A /\ y = B ) -> ( ph <-> ps ) )   =>    |- ( ( A e. V /\ B e. W ) -> ( ps -> E. x E. y ph ) )
Theorem	spc2gv 3123*	Specialization with two quantifiers, using implicit substitution. (Contributed by NM, 27-Apr-2004.)
|- ( ( x = A /\ y = B ) -> ( ph <-> ps ) )   =>    |- ( ( A e. V /\ B e. W ) -> ( A. x A. y ph -> ps ) )
Theorem	spc3egv 3124*	Existential specialization with three quantifiers, using implicit substitution. (Contributed by NM, 12-May-2008.)
|- ( ( x = A /\ y = B /\ z = C ) -> ( ph <-> ps ) )   =>    |- ( ( A e. V /\ B e. W /\ C e. X ) -> ( ps -> E. x E. y E. z ph ) )
Theorem	spc3gv 3125*	Specialization with three quantifiers, using implicit substitution. (Contributed by NM, 12-May-2008.)
|- ( ( x = A /\ y = B /\ z = C ) -> ( ph <-> ps ) )   =>    |- ( ( A e. V /\ B e. W /\ C e. X ) -> ( A. x A. y A. z ph -> ps ) )
Theorem	spcv 3126*	Rule of specialization, using implicit substitution. (Contributed by NM, 22-Jun-1994.)
|- A e. _V   &    |- ( x = A -> ( ph <-> ps ) )   =>    |- ( A. x ph -> ps )
Theorem	spcev 3127*	Existential specialization, using implicit substitution. (Contributed by NM, 31-Dec-1993.) (Proof shortened by Eric Schmidt, 22-Dec-2006.)
|- A e. _V   &    |- ( x = A -> ( ph <-> ps ) )   =>    |- ( ps -> E. x ph )
Theorem	spc2ev 3128*	Existential specialization, using implicit substitution. (Contributed by NM, 3-Aug-1995.)
|- A e. _V   &    |- B e. _V   &    |- ( ( x = A /\ y = B ) -> ( ph <-> ps ) )   =>    |- ( ps -> E. x E. y ph )
Theorem	rspct 3129*	A closed version of rspc 3130. (Contributed by Andrew Salmon, 6-Jun-2011.)
|- F/ x ps   =>    |- ( A. x ( x = A -> ( ph <-> ps ) ) -> ( A e. B -> ( A. x e. B ph -> ps ) ) )
Theorem	rspc 3130*	Restricted specialization, using implicit substitution. (Contributed by NM, 19-Apr-2005.) (Revised by Mario Carneiro, 11-Oct-2016.)
|- F/ x ps   &    |- ( x = A -> ( ph <-> ps ) )   =>    |- ( A e. B -> ( A. x e. B ph -> ps ) )
Theorem	rspce 3131*	Restricted existential specialization, using implicit substitution. (Contributed by NM, 26-May-1998.) (Revised by Mario Carneiro, 11-Oct-2016.)
|- F/ x ps   &    |- ( x = A -> ( ph <-> ps ) )   =>    |- ( ( A e. B /\ ps ) -> E. x e. B ph )
Theorem	rspcv 3132*	Restricted specialization, using implicit substitution. (Contributed by NM, 26-May-1998.)
|- ( x = A -> ( ph <-> ps ) )   =>    |- ( A e. B -> ( A. x e. B ph -> ps ) )
Theorem	rspccv 3133*	Restricted specialization, using implicit substitution. (Contributed by NM, 2-Feb-2006.)
|- ( x = A -> ( ph <-> ps ) )   =>    |- ( A. x e. B ph -> ( A e. B -> ps ) )
Theorem	rspcva 3134*	Restricted specialization, using implicit substitution. (Contributed by NM, 13-Sep-2005.)
|- ( x = A -> ( ph <-> ps ) )   =>    |- ( ( A e. B /\ A. x e. B ph ) -> ps )
Theorem	rspccva 3135*	Restricted specialization, using implicit substitution. (Contributed by NM, 26-Jul-2006.) (Proof shortened by Andrew Salmon, 8-Jun-2011.)
|- ( x = A -> ( ph <-> ps ) )   =>    |- ( ( A. x e. B ph /\ A e. B ) -> ps )
Theorem	rspcev 3136*	Restricted existential specialization, using implicit substitution. (Contributed by NM, 26-May-1998.)
|- ( x = A -> ( ph <-> ps ) )   =>    |- ( ( A e. B /\ ps ) -> E. x e. B ph )
Theorem	rspcimdv 3137*	Restricted specialization, using implicit substitution. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 4-Jan-2017.)
|- ( ph -> A e. B )   &    |- ( ( ph /\ x = A ) -> ( ps -> ch ) )   =>    |- ( ph -> ( A. x e. B ps -> ch ) )
Theorem	rspcimedv 3138*	Restricted existential specialization, using implicit substitution. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 4-Jan-2017.)
|- ( ph -> A e. B )   &    |- ( ( ph /\ x = A ) -> ( ch -> ps ) )   =>    |- ( ph -> ( ch -> E. x e. B ps ) )
Theorem	rspcdv 3139*	Restricted specialization, using implicit substitution. (Contributed by NM, 17-Feb-2007.) (Revised by Mario Carneiro, 4-Jan-2017.)
|- ( ph -> A e. B )   &    |- ( ( ph /\ x = A ) -> ( ps <-> ch ) )   =>    |- ( ph -> ( A. x e. B ps -> ch ) )
Theorem	rspcedv 3140*	Restricted existential specialization, using implicit substitution. (Contributed by FL, 17-Apr-2007.) (Revised by Mario Carneiro, 4-Jan-2017.)
|- ( ph -> A e. B )   &    |- ( ( ph /\ x = A ) -> ( ps <-> ch ) )   =>    |- ( ph -> ( ch -> E. x e. B ps ) )
Theorem	rspcda 3141*	Restricted specialization, using implicit substitution. (Contributed by Thierry Arnoux, 29-Jun-2020.)
|- ( x = C -> ( ps <-> ch ) )   &    |- ( ph -> A. x e. A ps )   &    |- ( ph -> C e. A )   &    |- F/ x ph   =>    |- ( ph -> ch )
Theorem	rspcdva 3142*	Restricted specialization, using implicit substitution. (Contributed by Thierry Arnoux, 21-Jun-2020.)
|- ( x = C -> ( ps <-> ch ) )   &    |- ( ph -> A. x e. A ps )   &    |- ( ph -> C e. A )   =>    |- ( ph -> ch )
Theorem	rspcedvd 3143*	Restricted existential specialization, using implicit substitution. Variant of rspcdv 3139. (Contributed by AV, 27-Nov-2019.)
|- ( ph -> A e. B )   &    |- ( ( ph /\ x = A ) -> ( ps <-> ch ) )   &    |- ( ph -> ch )   =>    |- ( ph -> E. x e. B ps )
Theorem	rspcedeq1vd 3144*	Restricted existential specialization, using implicit substitution. Variant of rspcedvd 3143 for equations, in which the left hand side depends on the quantified variable. (Contributed by AV, 24-Dec-2019.)
|- ( ph -> A e. B )   &    |- ( ( ph /\ x = A ) -> C = D )   =>    |- ( ph -> E. x e. B C = D )
Theorem	rspcedeq2vd 3145*	Restricted existential specialization, using implicit substitution. Variant of rspcedvd 3143 for equations, in which the right hand side depends on the quantified variable. (Contributed by AV, 24-Dec-2019.)
|- ( ph -> A e. B )   &    |- ( ( ph /\ x = A ) -> C = D )   =>    |- ( ph -> E. x e. B C = D )
Theorem	rspc2 3146*	2-variable restricted specialization, using implicit substitution. (Contributed by NM, 9-Nov-2012.)
|- F/ x ch   &    |- F/ y ps   &    |- ( x = A -> ( ph <-> ch ) )   &    |- ( y = B -> ( ch <-> ps ) )   =>    |- ( ( A e. C /\ B e. D ) -> ( A. x e. C A. y e. D ph -> ps ) )
Theorem	rspc2v 3147*	2-variable restricted specialization, using implicit substitution. (Contributed by NM, 13-Sep-1999.)
|- ( x = A -> ( ph <-> ch ) )   &    |- ( y = B -> ( ch <-> ps ) )   =>    |- ( ( A e. C /\ B e. D ) -> ( A. x e. C A. y e. D ph -> ps ) )
Theorem	rspc2va 3148*	2-variable restricted specialization, using implicit substitution. (Contributed by NM, 18-Jun-2014.)
|- ( x = A -> ( ph <-> ch ) )   &    |- ( y = B -> ( ch <-> ps ) )   =>    |- ( ( ( A e. C /\ B e. D ) /\ A. x e. C A. y e. D ph ) -> ps )
Theorem	rspc2ev 3149*	2-variable restricted existential specialization, using implicit substitution. (Contributed by NM, 16-Oct-1999.)
|- ( x = A -> ( ph <-> ch ) )   &    |- ( y = B -> ( ch <-> ps ) )   =>    |- ( ( A e. C /\ B e. D /\ ps ) -> E. x e. C E. y e. D ph )
Theorem	rspc3v 3150*	3-variable restricted specialization, using implicit substitution. (Contributed by NM, 10-May-2005.)
|- ( x = A -> ( ph <-> ch ) )   &    |- ( y = B -> ( ch <-> th ) )   &    |- ( z = C -> ( th <-> ps ) )   =>    |- ( ( A e. R /\ B e. S /\ C e. T ) -> ( A. x e. R A. y e. S A. z e. T ph -> ps ) )
Theorem	rspc3ev 3151*	3-variable restricted existential specialization, using implicit substitution. (Contributed by NM, 25-Jul-2012.)
|- ( x = A -> ( ph <-> ch ) )   &    |- ( y = B -> ( ch <-> th ) )   &    |- ( z = C -> ( th <-> ps ) )   =>    |- ( ( ( A e. R /\ B e. S /\ C e. T ) /\ ps ) -> E. x e. R E. y e. S E. z e. T ph )
Theorem	ralxpxfr2d 3152*	Transfer a universal quantifier between one variable with pair-like semantics and two. (Contributed by Stefan O'Rear, 27-Feb-2015.)
|- A e. _V   &    |- ( ph -> ( x e. B <-> E. y e. C E. z e. D x = A ) )   &    |- ( ( ph /\ x = A ) -> ( ps <-> ch ) )   =>    |- ( ph -> ( A. x e. B ps <-> A. y e. C A. z e. D ch ) )
Theorem	rexraleqim 3153*	Statement following from existence and generalization with equality. (Contributed by AV, 9-Feb-2019.)
|- ( x = z -> ( ps <-> ph ) )   &    |- ( z = Y -> ( ph <-> th ) )   =>    |- ( ( E. z e. A ph /\ A. x e. A ( ps -> x = Y ) ) -> th )
Theorem	eqvinc 3154*	A variable introduction law for class equality. (Contributed by NM, 14-Apr-1995.) (Proof shortened by Andrew Salmon, 8-Jun-2011.)
|- A e. _V   =>    |- ( A = B <-> E. x ( x = A /\ x = B ) )
Theorem	eqvincf 3155	A variable introduction law for class equality, using bound-variable hypotheses instead of distinct variable conditions. (Contributed by NM, 14-Sep-2003.)
|- F/_ x A   &    |- F/_ x B   &    |- A e. _V   =>    |- ( A = B <-> E. x ( x = A /\ x = B ) )
Theorem	alexeqg 3156*	Two ways to express substitution of A for x in ph. This is the analogue for classes of sb56 2096. (Contributed by NM, 2-Mar-1995.) (Revised by BJ, 27-Apr-2019.)
|- ( A e. V -> ( A. x ( x = A -> ph ) <-> E. x ( x = A /\ ph ) ) )
Theorem	ceqex 3157*	Equality implies equivalence with substitution. (Contributed by NM, 2-Mar-1995.) (Proof shortened by BJ, 1-May-2019.)
|- ( x = A -> ( ph <-> E. x ( x = A /\ ph ) ) )
Theorem	ceqsexg 3158*	A representation of explicit substitution of a class for a variable, inferred from an implicit substitution hypothesis. (Contributed by NM, 11-Oct-2004.)
|- F/ x ps   &    |- ( x = A -> ( ph <-> ps ) )   =>    |- ( A e. V -> ( E. x ( x = A /\ ph ) <-> ps ) )
Theorem	ceqsexgv 3159*	Elimination of an existential quantifier, using implicit substitution. (Contributed by NM, 29-Dec-1996.)
|- ( x = A -> ( ph <-> ps ) )   =>    |- ( A e. V -> ( E. x ( x = A /\ ph ) <-> ps ) )
Theorem	ceqsrexv 3160*	Elimination of a restricted existential quantifier, using implicit substitution. (Contributed by NM, 30-Apr-2004.)
|- ( x = A -> ( ph <-> ps ) )   =>    |- ( A e. B -> ( E. x e. B ( x = A /\ ph ) <-> ps ) )
Theorem	ceqsrexbv 3161*	Elimination of a restricted existential quantifier, using implicit substitution. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 14-Mar-2014.)
|- ( x = A -> ( ph <-> ps ) )   =>    |- ( E. x e. B ( x = A /\ ph ) <-> ( A e. B /\ ps ) )
Theorem	ceqsrex2v 3162*	Elimination of a restricted existential quantifier, using implicit substitution. (Contributed by NM, 29-Oct-2005.)
|- ( x = A -> ( ph <-> ps ) )   &    |- ( y = B -> ( ps <-> ch ) )   =>    |- ( ( A e. C /\ B e. D ) -> ( E. x e. C E. y e. D ( ( x = A /\ y = B ) /\ ph ) <-> ch ) )
Theorem	clel2 3163*	An alternate definition of class membership when the class is a set. (Contributed by NM, 18-Aug-1993.)
|- A e. _V   =>    |- ( A e. B <-> A. x ( x = A -> x e. B ) )
Theorem	clel3g 3164*	An alternate definition of class membership when the class is a set. (Contributed by NM, 13-Aug-2005.)
|- ( B e. V -> ( A e. B <-> E. x ( x = B /\ A e. x ) ) )
Theorem	clel3 3165*	An alternate definition of class membership when the class is a set. (Contributed by NM, 18-Aug-1993.)
|- B e. _V   =>    |- ( A e. B <-> E. x ( x = B /\ A e. x ) )
Theorem	clel4 3166*	An alternate definition of class membership when the class is a set. (Contributed by NM, 18-Aug-1993.)
|- B e. _V   =>    |- ( A e. B <-> A. x ( x = B -> A e. x ) )
Theorem	pm13.183 3167*	Compare theorem *13.183 in [WhiteheadRussell] p. 178. Only A is required to be a set. (Contributed by Andrew Salmon, 3-Jun-2011.)
|- ( A e. V -> ( A = B <-> A. z ( z = A <-> z = B ) ) )
Theorem	rr19.3v 3168*	Restricted quantifier version of Theorem 19.3 of [Margaris] p. 89. We don't need the nonempty class condition of r19.3rzv 3853 when there is an outer quantifier. (Contributed by NM, 25-Oct-2012.)
|- ( A. x e. A A. y e. A ph <-> A. x e. A ph )
Theorem	rr19.28v 3169*	Restricted quantifier version of Theorem 19.28 of [Margaris] p. 90. We don't need the nonempty class condition of r19.28zv 3855 when there is an outer quantifier. (Contributed by NM, 29-Oct-2012.)
|- ( A. x e. A A. y e. A ( ph /\ ps ) <-> A. x e. A ( ph /\ A. y e. A ps ) )
Theorem	elabgt 3170*	Membership in a class abstraction, using implicit substitution. (Closed theorem version of elabg 3174.) (Contributed by NM, 7-Nov-2005.) (Proof shortened by Andrew Salmon, 8-Jun-2011.)
|- ( ( A e. B /\ A. x ( x = A -> ( ph <-> ps ) ) ) -> ( A e. { x | ph } <-> ps ) )
Theorem	elabgf 3171	Membership in a class abstraction, using implicit substitution. Compare Theorem 6.13 of [Quine] p. 44. This version has bound-variable hypotheses in place of distinct variable restrictions. (Contributed by NM, 21-Sep-2003.) (Revised by Mario Carneiro, 12-Oct-2016.)
|- F/_ x A   &    |- F/ x ps   &    |- ( x = A -> ( ph <-> ps ) )   =>    |- ( A e. B -> ( A e. { x | ph } <-> ps ) )
Theorem	elabf 3172*	Membership in a class abstraction, using implicit substitution. (Contributed by NM, 1-Aug-1994.) (Revised by Mario Carneiro, 12-Oct-2016.)
|- F/ x ps   &    |- A e. _V   &    |- ( x = A -> ( ph <-> ps ) )   =>    |- ( A e. { x | ph } <-> ps )
Theorem	elab 3173*	Membership in a class abstraction, using implicit substitution. Compare Theorem 6.13 of [Quine] p. 44. (Contributed by NM, 1-Aug-1994.)
|- A e. _V   &    |- ( x = A -> ( ph <-> ps ) )   =>    |- ( A e. { x | ph } <-> ps )
Theorem	elabg 3174*	Membership in a class abstraction, using implicit substitution. Compare Theorem 6.13 of [Quine] p. 44. (Contributed by NM, 14-Apr-1995.)
|- ( x = A -> ( ph <-> ps ) )   =>    |- ( A e. V -> ( A e. { x | ph } <-> ps ) )
Theorem	elab2g 3175*	Membership in a class abstraction, using implicit substitution. (Contributed by NM, 13-Sep-1995.)
|- ( x = A -> ( ph <-> ps ) )   &    |- B = { x | ph }   =>    |- ( A e. V -> ( A e. B <-> ps ) )
Theorem	elab2 3176*	Membership in a class abstraction, using implicit substitution. (Contributed by NM, 13-Sep-1995.)
|- A e. _V   &    |- ( x = A -> ( ph <-> ps ) )   &    |- B = { x | ph }   =>    |- ( A e. B <-> ps )
Theorem	elab4g 3177*	Membership in a class abstraction, using implicit substitution. (Contributed by NM, 17-Oct-2012.)
|- ( x = A -> ( ph <-> ps ) )   &    |- B = { x | ph }   =>    |- ( A e. B <-> ( A e. _V /\ ps ) )
Theorem	elab3gf 3178	Membership in a class abstraction, with a weaker antecedent than elabgf 3171. (Contributed by NM, 6-Sep-2011.)
|- F/_ x A   &    |- F/ x ps   &    |- ( x = A -> ( ph <-> ps ) )   =>    |- ( ( ps -> A e. B ) -> ( A e. { x | ph } <-> ps ) )
Theorem	elab3g 3179*	Membership in a class abstraction, with a weaker antecedent than elabg 3174. (Contributed by NM, 29-Aug-2006.)
|- ( x = A -> ( ph <-> ps ) )   =>    |- ( ( ps -> A e. B ) -> ( A e. { x | ph } <-> ps ) )
Theorem	elab3 3180*	Membership in a class abstraction using implicit substitution. (Contributed by NM, 10-Nov-2000.)
|- ( ps -> A e. _V )   &    |- ( x = A -> ( ph <-> ps ) )   =>    |- ( A e. { x | ph } <-> ps )
Theorem	elrabi 3181*	Implication for the membership in a restricted class abstraction. (Contributed by Alexander van der Vekens, 31-Dec-2017.)
|- ( A e. { x e. V | ph } -> A e. V )
Theorem	elrabf 3182	Membership in a restricted class abstraction, using implicit substitution. This version has bound-variable hypotheses in place of distinct variable restrictions. (Contributed by NM, 21-Sep-2003.)
|- F/_ x A   &    |- F/_ x B   &    |- F/ x ps   &    |- ( x = A -> ( ph <-> ps ) )   =>    |- ( A e. { x e. B | ph } <-> ( A e. B /\ ps ) )
Theorem	elrab3t 3183*	Membership in a restricted class abstraction, using implicit substitution. (Closed theorem version of elrab3 3185.) (Contributed by Thierry Arnoux, 31-Aug-2017.)
|- ( ( A. x ( x = A -> ( ph <-> ps ) ) /\ A e. B ) -> ( A e. { x e. B | ph } <-> ps ) )
Theorem	elrab 3184*	Membership in a restricted class abstraction, using implicit substitution. (Contributed by NM, 21-May-1999.)
|- ( x = A -> ( ph <-> ps ) )   =>    |- ( A e. { x e. B | ph } <-> ( A e. B /\ ps ) )
Theorem	elrab3 3185*	Membership in a restricted class abstraction, using implicit substitution. (Contributed by NM, 5-Oct-2006.)
|- ( x = A -> ( ph <-> ps ) )   =>    |- ( A e. B -> ( A e. { x e. B | ph } <-> ps ) )
Theorem	elrab2 3186*	Membership in a class abstraction, using implicit substitution. (Contributed by NM, 2-Nov-2006.)
|- ( x = A -> ( ph <-> ps ) )   &    |- C = { x e. B | ph }   =>    |- ( A e. C <-> ( A e. B /\ ps ) )
Theorem	ralab 3187*	Universal quantification over a class abstraction. (Contributed by Jeff Madsen, 10-Jun-2010.)
|- ( y = x -> ( ph <-> ps ) )   =>    |- ( A. x e. { y | ph } ch <-> A. x ( ps -> ch ) )
Theorem	ralrab 3188*	Universal quantification over a restricted class abstraction. (Contributed by Jeff Madsen, 10-Jun-2010.)
|- ( y = x -> ( ph <-> ps ) )   =>    |- ( A. x e. { y e. A | ph } ch <-> A. x e. A ( ps -> ch ) )
Theorem	rexab 3189*	Existential quantification over a class abstraction. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 23-Jan-2014.) (Revised by Mario Carneiro, 3-Sep-2015.)
|- ( y = x -> ( ph <-> ps ) )   =>    |- ( E. x e. { y | ph } ch <-> E. x ( ps /\ ch ) )
Theorem	rexrab 3190*	Existential quantification over a class abstraction. (Contributed by Jeff Madsen, 17-Jun-2011.) (Revised by Mario Carneiro, 3-Sep-2015.)
|- ( y = x -> ( ph <-> ps ) )   =>    |- ( E. x e. { y e. A | ph } ch <-> E. x e. A ( ps /\ ch ) )
Theorem	ralab2 3191*	Universal quantification over a class abstraction. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 3-Sep-2015.)
|- ( x = y -> ( ps <-> ch ) )   =>    |- ( A. x e. { y | ph } ps <-> A. y ( ph -> ch ) )
Theorem	ralrab2 3192*	Universal quantification over a restricted class abstraction. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 3-Sep-2015.)
|- ( x = y -> ( ps <-> ch ) )   =>    |- ( A. x e. { y e. A | ph } ps <-> A. y e. A ( ph -> ch ) )
Theorem	rexab2 3193*	Existential quantification over a class abstraction. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 3-Sep-2015.)
|- ( x = y -> ( ps <-> ch ) )   =>    |- ( E. x e. { y | ph } ps <-> E. y ( ph /\ ch ) )
Theorem	rexrab2 3194*	Existential quantification over a class abstraction. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 3-Sep-2015.)
|- ( x = y -> ( ps <-> ch ) )   =>    |- ( E. x e. { y e. A | ph } ps <-> E. y e. A ( ph /\ ch ) )
Theorem	abidnf 3195*	Identity used to create closed-form versions of bound-variable hypothesis builders for class expressions. (Contributed by NM, 10-Nov-2005.) (Proof shortened by Mario Carneiro, 12-Oct-2016.)
|- ( F/_ x A -> { z | A. x z e. A } = A )
Theorem	dedhb 3196*	A deduction theorem for converting the inference |- F/_ x A => |- ph into a closed theorem. Use nfa1 1999 and nfab 2616 to eliminate the hypothesis of the substitution instance ps of the inference. For converting the inference form into a deduction form, abidnf 3195 is useful. (Contributed by NM, 8-Dec-2006.)
|- ( A = { z | A. x z e. A } -> ( ph <-> ps ) )   &    |- ps   =>    |- ( F/_ x A -> ph )
Theorem	eqeu 3197*	A condition which implies existential uniqueness. (Contributed by Jeff Hankins, 8-Sep-2009.)
|- ( x = A -> ( ph <-> ps ) )   =>    |- ( ( A e. B /\ ps /\ A. x ( ph -> x = A ) ) -> E! x ph )
Theorem	eueq 3198*	Equality has existential uniqueness. (Contributed by NM, 25-Nov-1994.)
|- ( A e. _V <-> E! x x = A )
Theorem	eueq1 3199*	Equality has existential uniqueness. (Contributed by NM, 5-Apr-1995.)
|- A e. _V   =>    |- E! x x = A
Theorem	eueq2 3200*	Equality has existential uniqueness (split into 2 cases). (Contributed by NM, 5-Apr-1995.)
|- A e. _V   &    |- B e. _V   =>    |- E! x ( ( ph /\ x = A ) \/ ( -. ph /\ x = B ) )