Theorem jao 367

Description: Disjunction of antecedents. Compare Theorem *3.44 of [WhiteheadRussell] p. 113.

Assertion

Ref	Expression
jao	|- ((ph -> ps) -> ((ch -> ps) -> ((ph \/ ch) -> ps)))

Proof of Theorem jao

Step	Hyp	Ref	Expression
1		con3 110	. 2 |- ((ph -> ps) -> (-. ps -> -. ph))
2		pm3.43i 309	. . . . 5 |- ((-. ps -> -. ph) -> ((-. ps -> -. ch) -> (-. ps -> (-. ph /\ -. ch))))
3		con1 108	. . . . 5 |- ((-. ps -> (-. ph /\ -. ch)) -> (-. (-. ph /\ -. ch) -> ps))
4	2, 3	syl6 25	. . . 4 |- ((-. ps -> -. ph) -> ((-. ps -> -. ch) -> (-. (-. ph /\ -. ch) -> ps)))
5		oran 338	. . . 4 |- ((ph \/ ch) <-> -. (-. ph /\ -. ch))
6	4, 5	syl7ib 233	. . 3 |- ((-. ps -> -. ph) -> ((-. ps -> -. ch) -> ((ph \/ ch) -> ps)))
7		con3 110	. . 3 |- ((ch -> ps) -> (-. ps -> -. ch))
8	6, 7	syl5 20	. 2 |- ((-. ps -> -. ph) -> ((ch -> ps) -> ((ph \/ ch) -> ps)))
9	1, 8	syl 12	1 |- ((ph -> ps) -> ((ch -> ps) -> ((ph \/ ch) -> ps)))

Syntax hints:  -. wn 2   -> wi 3   \/ wo 239   /\ wa 240

This theorem is referenced by:  jaoi 368  jaob 467  jaod 469  3jao 1158  suctr 3751  en3lplem2 5757  indpi 6186  suctrALT2VD 16660  suctrALT2 16661  en3lplem2VD 16668

This theorem was proved from axioms:  ax-1 4  ax-2 5  ax-3 6  ax-mp 7

This theorem depends on definitions:  df-bi 164  df-or 241  df-an 242

Copyright terms: Public domain