HomeHome Metamath Proof Explorer < Previous   Next >
Related theorems
Unicode version

Theorem hbsbc1gdOLD 2516
Description: Deduction version of hbsbc1g 2461.
Hypotheses
Ref Expression
hbsbc1gd.1 |- (ph -> A.xph)
hbsbc1gd.2 |- (ph -> (y e. A -> A.x y e. A))
Assertion
Ref Expression
hbsbc1gdOLD |- ((ph /\ A e. B) -> ([A / x]ps -> A.x[A / x]ps))
Distinct variable groups:   y,A   ph,y   x,y

Proof of Theorem hbsbc1gdOLD
StepHypRef Expression
1 ax-4 1319 . . . . . . . . 9 |- (A.x y e. A -> y e. A)
2 hbsbc1gd.2 . . . . . . . . 9 |- (ph -> (y e. A -> A.x y e. A))
31, 2impbid2 576 . . . . . . . 8 |- (ph -> (A.x y e. A <-> y e. A))
43abbidv 2008 . . . . . . 7 |- (ph -> {y | A.x y e. A} = {y | y e. A})
5 eleq1 1957 . . . . . . . . 9 |- (y = z -> (y e. A <-> z e. A))
65albidv 1656 . . . . . . . 8 |- (y = z -> (A.x y e. A <-> A.x z e. A))
76cbvabv 2420 . . . . . . 7 |- {y | A.x y e. A} = {z | A.x z e. A}
8 abid2 2011 . . . . . . 7 |- {y | y e. A} = A
94, 7, 83eqtr3g 1952 . . . . . 6 |- (ph -> {z | A.x z e. A} = A)
109eleq1d 1963 . . . . 5 |- (ph -> ({z | A.x z e. A} e. _V <-> A e. _V))
1110biimpar 461 . . . 4 |- ((ph /\ A e. _V) -> {z | A.x z e. A} e. _V)
12 hba1 1350 . . . . . 6 |- (A.x z e. A -> A.xA.x z e. A)
1312hbab 1875 . . . . 5 |- (y e. {z | A.x z e. A} -> A.x y e. {z | A.x z e. A})
1413hbsbc1g 2461 . . . 4 |- ({z | A.x z e. A} e. _V -> ([{z | A.x z e. A} / x]ps -> A.x[{z | A.x z e. A} / x]ps))
1511, 14syl 12 . . 3 |- ((ph /\ A e. _V) -> ([{z | A.x z e. A} / x]ps -> A.x[{z | A.x z e. A} / x]ps))
16219.21aiv 1664 . . . . 5 |- (ph -> A.y(y e. A -> A.x y e. A))
17 abidhb 2423 . . . . 5 |- (A.y(y e. A -> A.x y e. A) -> {z | A.x z e. A} = A)
18 dfsbcq 2455 . . . . 5 |- ({z | A.x z e. A} = A -> ([{z | A.x z e. A} / x]ps <-> [A / x]ps))
1916, 17, 183syl 24 . . . 4 |- (ph -> ([{z | A.x z e. A} / x]ps <-> [A / x]ps))
2019adantr 425 . . 3 |- ((ph /\ A e. _V) -> ([{z | A.x z e. A} / x]ps <-> [A / x]ps))
21 hbsbc1gd.1 . . . . . . 7 |- (ph -> A.xph)
2221a1d 15 . . . . . 6 |- (ph -> (ph -> A.xph))
23 ax-17 1317 . . . . . . . 8 |- (y e. _V -> A.x y e. _V)
2423a1i 8 . . . . . . 7 |- (ph -> (y e. _V -> A.x y e. _V))
2521, 2, 24hbeld 2425 . . . . . 6 |- (ph -> (A e. _V -> A.x A e. _V))
2622, 25hband 1469 . . . . 5 |- (ph -> ((ph /\ A e. _V) -> A.x(ph /\ A e. _V)))
2726anabsi5 553 . . . 4 |- ((ph /\ A e. _V) -> A.x(ph /\ A e. _V))
2827, 20albid 1459 . . 3 |- ((ph /\ A e. _V) -> (A.x[{z | A.x z e. A} / x]ps <-> A.x[A / x]ps))
2915, 20, 283imtr3d 601 . 2 |- ((ph /\ A e. _V) -> ([A / x]ps -> A.x[A / x]ps))
30 elisset 2299 . 2 |- (A e. B -> A e. _V)
3129, 30sylan2 500 1 |- ((ph /\ A e. B) -> ([A / x]ps -> A.x[A / x]ps))
Colors of variables: wff set class
Syntax hints:   -> wi 3   <-> wb 163   /\ wa 240  A.wal 1296   = wceq 1298   e. wcel 1300  [wsbc 1534  {cab 1871  _Vcvv 2292
This theorem was proved from axioms:  ax-1 4  ax-2 5  ax-3 6  ax-mp 7  ax-5 1302  ax-7 1304  ax-gen 1305  ax-8 1306  ax-9 1307  ax-10 1308  ax-11 1309  ax-12 1310  ax-17 1317  ax-4 1319  ax-5o 1321  ax-6o 1324  ax-9o 1481  ax-10o 1500  ax-16 1580  ax-11o 1588  ax-ext 1865
This theorem depends on definitions:  df-bi 164  df-or 241  df-an 242  df-ex 1327  df-sb 1536  df-clab 1872  df-cleq 1877  df-clel 1880  df-v 2294  df-sbc 2454
Copyright terms: Public domain