HomeHome Metamath Proof Explorer < Previous   Next >
Related theorems
Unicode version

Theorem hbfvd 4687
Description: Deduction version of bound-variable hypothesis builder hbfv 4686. If a closed theorem version is desired, see hbfvd2 4688.
Hypotheses
Ref Expression
hbfvd.1 |- (ph -> A.xph)
hbfvd.2 |- (ph -> (y e. F -> A.x y e. F))
hbfvd.3 |- (ph -> (y e. A -> A.x y e. A))
Assertion
Ref Expression
hbfvd |- (ph -> (y e. (F` A) -> A.x y e. (F` A)))
Distinct variable groups:   y,A   y,F   ph,y   x,y

Proof of Theorem hbfvd
StepHypRef Expression
1 hba1 1350 . . . . 5 |- (A.x z e. F -> A.xA.x z e. F)
21hbab 1875 . . . 4 |- (y e. {z | A.x z e. F} -> A.x y e. {z | A.x z e. F})
3 hba1 1350 . . . . 5 |- (A.x z e. A -> A.xA.x z e. A)
43hbab 1875 . . . 4 |- (y e. {z | A.x z e. A} -> A.x y e. {z | A.x z e. A})
52, 4hbfv 4686 . . 3 |- (y e. ({z | A.x z e. F}` {z | A.x z e. A}) -> A.x y e. ({z | A.x z e. F}` {z | A.x z e. A}))
65a1i 8 . 2 |- (ph -> (y e. ({z | A.x z e. F}` {z | A.x z e. A}) -> A.x y e. ({z | A.x z e. F}` {z | A.x z e. A})))
7 hbfvd.2 . . . . . . 7 |- (ph -> (y e. F -> A.x y e. F))
8719.21aiv 1664 . . . . . 6 |- (ph -> A.y(y e. F -> A.x y e. F))
9 abidhb 2423 . . . . . 6 |- (A.y(y e. F -> A.x y e. F) -> {z | A.x z e. F} = F)
108, 9syl 12 . . . . 5 |- (ph -> {z | A.x z e. F} = F)
1110fveq1d 4683 . . . 4 |- (ph -> ({z | A.x z e. F}` {z | A.x z e. A}) = (F` {z | A.x z e. A}))
12 hbfvd.3 . . . . . . 7 |- (ph -> (y e. A -> A.x y e. A))
131219.21aiv 1664 . . . . . 6 |- (ph -> A.y(y e. A -> A.x y e. A))
14 abidhb 2423 . . . . . 6 |- (A.y(y e. A -> A.x y e. A) -> {z | A.x z e. A} = A)
1513, 14syl 12 . . . . 5 |- (ph -> {z | A.x z e. A} = A)
1615fveq2d 4685 . . . 4 |- (ph -> (F` {z | A.x z e. A}) = (F` A))
1711, 16eqtrd 1925 . . 3 |- (ph -> ({z | A.x z e. F}` {z | A.x z e. A}) = (F` A))
1817eleq2d 1964 . 2 |- (ph -> (y e. ({z | A.x z e. F}` {z | A.x z e. A}) <-> y e. (F` A)))
19 hbfvd.1 . . 3 |- (ph -> A.xph)
2019, 18albid 1459 . 2 |- (ph -> (A.x y e. ({z | A.x z e. F}` {z | A.x z e. A}) <-> A.x y e. (F` A)))
216, 18, 203imtr3d 601 1 |- (ph -> (y e. (F` A) -> A.x y e. (F` A)))
Colors of variables: wff set class
Syntax hints:   -> wi 3  A.wal 1296   = wceq 1298   e. wcel 1300  {cab 1871  ` cfv 3998
This theorem is referenced by:  csbfv12g 4699  hboprd 4905
This theorem was proved from axioms:  ax-1 4  ax-2 5  ax-3 6  ax-mp 7  ax-5 1302  ax-7 1304  ax-gen 1305  ax-8 1306  ax-9 1307  ax-10 1308  ax-11 1309  ax-12 1310  ax-14 1312  ax-17 1317  ax-4 1319  ax-5o 1321  ax-6o 1324  ax-9o 1481  ax-10o 1500  ax-16 1580  ax-11o 1588  ax-ext 1865  ax-sep 3438  ax-nul 3445  ax-pow 3481  ax-pr 3524
This theorem depends on definitions:  df-bi 164  df-or 241  df-an 242  df-ex 1327  df-sb 1536  df-eu 1775  df-mo 1776  df-clab 1872  df-cleq 1877  df-clel 1880  df-ne 2019  df-rex 2110  df-v 2294  df-dif 2597  df-un 2600  df-in 2603  df-ss 2605  df-nul 2876  df-pw 3035  df-sn 3049  df-pr 3050  df-op 3053  df-uni 3178  df-br 3339  df-opab 3396  df-xp 4000  df-cnv 4002  df-dm 4004  df-rn 4005  df-res 4006  df-ima 4007  df-fv 4014
Copyright terms: Public domain