MPE Home Metamath Proof Explorer < Previous   Next >
Nearby theorems
Mirrors  >  Home  >  MPE Home  >  Th. List  >  fzval2 Structured version   Unicode version

Theorem fzval2 11436
Description: An alternative way of expressing a finite set of sequential integers. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 3-Nov-2013.)
Assertion
Ref Expression
fzval2  |-  ( ( M  e.  ZZ  /\  N  e.  ZZ )  ->  ( M ... N
)  =  ( ( M [,] N )  i^i  ZZ ) )

Proof of Theorem fzval2
Dummy variable  k is distinct from all other variables.
StepHypRef Expression
1 fzval 11435 . 2  |-  ( ( M  e.  ZZ  /\  N  e.  ZZ )  ->  ( M ... N
)  =  { k  e.  ZZ  |  ( M  <_  k  /\  k  <_  N ) } )
2 zssre 10649 . . . . . . 7  |-  ZZ  C_  RR
3 ressxr 9423 . . . . . . 7  |-  RR  C_  RR*
42, 3sstri 3362 . . . . . 6  |-  ZZ  C_  RR*
54sseli 3349 . . . . 5  |-  ( M  e.  ZZ  ->  M  e.  RR* )
64sseli 3349 . . . . 5  |-  ( N  e.  ZZ  ->  N  e.  RR* )
7 iccval 11335 . . . . 5  |-  ( ( M  e.  RR*  /\  N  e.  RR* )  ->  ( M [,] N )  =  { k  e.  RR*  |  ( M  <_  k  /\  k  <_  N ) } )
85, 6, 7syl2an 474 . . . 4  |-  ( ( M  e.  ZZ  /\  N  e.  ZZ )  ->  ( M [,] N
)  =  { k  e.  RR*  |  ( M  <_  k  /\  k  <_  N ) } )
98ineq1d 3548 . . 3  |-  ( ( M  e.  ZZ  /\  N  e.  ZZ )  ->  ( ( M [,] N )  i^i  ZZ )  =  ( {
k  e.  RR*  |  ( M  <_  k  /\  k  <_  N ) }  i^i  ZZ ) )
10 inrab2 3620 . . . 4  |-  ( { k  e.  RR*  |  ( M  <_  k  /\  k  <_  N ) }  i^i  ZZ )  =  { k  e.  (
RR*  i^i  ZZ )  |  ( M  <_ 
k  /\  k  <_  N ) }
11 sseqin2 3566 . . . . . 6  |-  ( ZZ  C_  RR*  <->  ( RR*  i^i  ZZ )  =  ZZ )
124, 11mpbi 208 . . . . 5  |-  ( RR*  i^i 
ZZ )  =  ZZ
13 rabeq 2964 . . . . 5  |-  ( (
RR*  i^i  ZZ )  =  ZZ  ->  { k  e.  ( RR*  i^i  ZZ )  |  ( M  <_  k  /\  k  <_  N ) }  =  { k  e.  ZZ  |  ( M  <_ 
k  /\  k  <_  N ) } )
1412, 13ax-mp 5 . . . 4  |-  { k  e.  ( RR*  i^i  ZZ )  |  ( M  <_  k  /\  k  <_  N ) }  =  { k  e.  ZZ  |  ( M  <_ 
k  /\  k  <_  N ) }
1510, 14eqtri 2461 . . 3  |-  ( { k  e.  RR*  |  ( M  <_  k  /\  k  <_  N ) }  i^i  ZZ )  =  { k  e.  ZZ  |  ( M  <_ 
k  /\  k  <_  N ) }
169, 15syl6req 2490 . 2  |-  ( ( M  e.  ZZ  /\  N  e.  ZZ )  ->  { k  e.  ZZ  |  ( M  <_ 
k  /\  k  <_  N ) }  =  ( ( M [,] N
)  i^i  ZZ )
)
171, 16eqtrd 2473 1  |-  ( ( M  e.  ZZ  /\  N  e.  ZZ )  ->  ( M ... N
)  =  ( ( M [,] N )  i^i  ZZ ) )
Colors of variables: wff setvar class
Syntax hints:    -> wi 4    /\ wa 369    = wceq 1364    e. wcel 1761   {crab 2717    i^i cin 3324    C_ wss 3325   class class class wbr 4289  (class class class)co 6090   RRcr 9277   RR*cxr 9413    <_ cle 9415   ZZcz 10642   [,]cicc 11299   ...cfz 11433
This theorem was proved from axioms:  ax-mp 5  ax-1 6  ax-2 7  ax-3 8  ax-gen 1596  ax-4 1607  ax-5 1675  ax-6 1713  ax-7 1733  ax-8 1763  ax-9 1765  ax-10 1780  ax-11 1785  ax-12 1797  ax-13 1948  ax-ext 2422  ax-sep 4410  ax-nul 4418  ax-pr 4528  ax-un 6371  ax-cnex 9334  ax-resscn 9335
This theorem depends on definitions:  df-bi 185  df-or 370  df-an 371  df-3or 961  df-3an 962  df-tru 1367  df-ex 1592  df-nf 1595  df-sb 1706  df-eu 2263  df-mo 2264  df-clab 2428  df-cleq 2434  df-clel 2437  df-nfc 2566  df-ne 2606  df-ral 2718  df-rex 2719  df-rab 2722  df-v 2972  df-sbc 3184  df-dif 3328  df-un 3330  df-in 3332  df-ss 3339  df-nul 3635  df-if 3789  df-sn 3875  df-pr 3877  df-op 3881  df-uni 4089  df-br 4290  df-opab 4348  df-id 4632  df-xp 4842  df-rel 4843  df-cnv 4844  df-co 4845  df-dm 4846  df-iota 5378  df-fun 5417  df-fv 5423  df-ov 6093  df-oprab 6094  df-mpt2 6095  df-xr 9418  df-neg 9594  df-z 10643  df-icc 11303  df-fz 11434
This theorem is referenced by:  dvfsumle  21393  dvfsumabs  21395  taylplem1  21771  taylplem2  21772  taylpfval  21773  dvtaylp  21778  ppisval  22384
  Copyright terms: Public domain W3C validator