MPE Home Metamath Proof Explorer < Previous   Next >
Nearby theorems
Mirrors  >  Home  >  MPE Home  >  Th. List  >  fzval2 Structured version   Visualization version   Unicode version

Theorem fzval2 11813
Description: An alternative way of expressing a finite set of sequential integers. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 3-Nov-2013.)
Assertion
Ref Expression
fzval2  |-  ( ( M  e.  ZZ  /\  N  e.  ZZ )  ->  ( M ... N
)  =  ( ( M [,] N )  i^i  ZZ ) )

Proof of Theorem fzval2
Dummy variable  k is distinct from all other variables.
StepHypRef Expression
1 fzval 11812 . 2  |-  ( ( M  e.  ZZ  /\  N  e.  ZZ )  ->  ( M ... N
)  =  { k  e.  ZZ  |  ( M  <_  k  /\  k  <_  N ) } )
2 zssre 10968 . . . . . . 7  |-  ZZ  C_  RR
3 ressxr 9702 . . . . . . 7  |-  RR  C_  RR*
42, 3sstri 3427 . . . . . 6  |-  ZZ  C_  RR*
54sseli 3414 . . . . 5  |-  ( M  e.  ZZ  ->  M  e.  RR* )
64sseli 3414 . . . . 5  |-  ( N  e.  ZZ  ->  N  e.  RR* )
7 iccval 11700 . . . . 5  |-  ( ( M  e.  RR*  /\  N  e.  RR* )  ->  ( M [,] N )  =  { k  e.  RR*  |  ( M  <_  k  /\  k  <_  N ) } )
85, 6, 7syl2an 485 . . . 4  |-  ( ( M  e.  ZZ  /\  N  e.  ZZ )  ->  ( M [,] N
)  =  { k  e.  RR*  |  ( M  <_  k  /\  k  <_  N ) } )
98ineq1d 3624 . . 3  |-  ( ( M  e.  ZZ  /\  N  e.  ZZ )  ->  ( ( M [,] N )  i^i  ZZ )  =  ( {
k  e.  RR*  |  ( M  <_  k  /\  k  <_  N ) }  i^i  ZZ ) )
10 inrab2 3707 . . . 4  |-  ( { k  e.  RR*  |  ( M  <_  k  /\  k  <_  N ) }  i^i  ZZ )  =  { k  e.  (
RR*  i^i  ZZ )  |  ( M  <_ 
k  /\  k  <_  N ) }
11 sseqin2 3642 . . . . . 6  |-  ( ZZ  C_  RR*  <->  ( RR*  i^i  ZZ )  =  ZZ )
124, 11mpbi 213 . . . . 5  |-  ( RR*  i^i 
ZZ )  =  ZZ
13 rabeq 3024 . . . . 5  |-  ( (
RR*  i^i  ZZ )  =  ZZ  ->  { k  e.  ( RR*  i^i  ZZ )  |  ( M  <_  k  /\  k  <_  N ) }  =  { k  e.  ZZ  |  ( M  <_ 
k  /\  k  <_  N ) } )
1412, 13ax-mp 5 . . . 4  |-  { k  e.  ( RR*  i^i  ZZ )  |  ( M  <_  k  /\  k  <_  N ) }  =  { k  e.  ZZ  |  ( M  <_ 
k  /\  k  <_  N ) }
1510, 14eqtri 2493 . . 3  |-  ( { k  e.  RR*  |  ( M  <_  k  /\  k  <_  N ) }  i^i  ZZ )  =  { k  e.  ZZ  |  ( M  <_ 
k  /\  k  <_  N ) }
169, 15syl6req 2522 . 2  |-  ( ( M  e.  ZZ  /\  N  e.  ZZ )  ->  { k  e.  ZZ  |  ( M  <_ 
k  /\  k  <_  N ) }  =  ( ( M [,] N
)  i^i  ZZ )
)
171, 16eqtrd 2505 1  |-  ( ( M  e.  ZZ  /\  N  e.  ZZ )  ->  ( M ... N
)  =  ( ( M [,] N )  i^i  ZZ ) )
Colors of variables: wff setvar class
Syntax hints:    -> wi 4    /\ wa 376    = wceq 1452    e. wcel 1904   {crab 2760    i^i cin 3389    C_ wss 3390   class class class wbr 4395  (class class class)co 6308   RRcr 9556   RR*cxr 9692    <_ cle 9694   ZZcz 10961   [,]cicc 11663   ...cfz 11810
This theorem was proved from axioms:  ax-mp 5  ax-1 6  ax-2 7  ax-3 8  ax-gen 1677  ax-4 1690  ax-5 1766  ax-6 1813  ax-7 1859  ax-8 1906  ax-9 1913  ax-10 1932  ax-11 1937  ax-12 1950  ax-13 2104  ax-ext 2451  ax-sep 4518  ax-nul 4527  ax-pr 4639  ax-un 6602  ax-cnex 9613  ax-resscn 9614
This theorem depends on definitions:  df-bi 190  df-or 377  df-an 378  df-3or 1008  df-3an 1009  df-tru 1455  df-ex 1672  df-nf 1676  df-sb 1806  df-eu 2323  df-mo 2324  df-clab 2458  df-cleq 2464  df-clel 2467  df-nfc 2601  df-ne 2643  df-ral 2761  df-rex 2762  df-rab 2765  df-v 3033  df-sbc 3256  df-dif 3393  df-un 3395  df-in 3397  df-ss 3404  df-nul 3723  df-if 3873  df-sn 3960  df-pr 3962  df-op 3966  df-uni 4191  df-br 4396  df-opab 4455  df-id 4754  df-xp 4845  df-rel 4846  df-cnv 4847  df-co 4848  df-dm 4849  df-iota 5553  df-fun 5591  df-fv 5597  df-ov 6311  df-oprab 6312  df-mpt2 6313  df-xr 9697  df-neg 9883  df-z 10962  df-icc 11667  df-fz 11811
This theorem is referenced by:  dvfsumle  23052  dvfsumabs  23054  taylplem1  23397  taylplem2  23398  taylpfval  23399  dvtaylp  23404  ppisval  24109
  Copyright terms: Public domain W3C validator