HomeHome Metamath Proof Explorer < Previous   Next >
Related theorems
Unicode version

Theorem euor2OLD 1840
Description: Introduce or eliminate a disjunct in a uniqueness quantifier.
Assertion
Ref Expression
euor2OLD |- (-. E.xph -> (E!x(ph \/ ps) <-> E!xps))

Proof of Theorem euor2OLD
StepHypRef Expression
1 euex 1788 . . . . . . 7 |- (E!x(ph \/ ps) -> E.x(ph \/ ps))
2 19.43 1440 . . . . . . 7 |- (E.x(ph \/ ps) <-> (E.xph \/ E.xps))
31, 2sylib 215 . . . . . 6 |- (E!x(ph \/ ps) -> (E.xph \/ E.xps))
43ord 249 . . . . 5 |- (E!x(ph \/ ps) -> (-. E.xph -> E.xps))
54com12 14 . . . 4 |- (-. E.xph -> (E!x(ph \/ ps) -> E.xps))
6 eumo 1807 . . . . . 6 |- (E!x(ph \/ ps) -> E*x(ph \/ ps))
7 orcom 266 . . . . . . . 8 |- ((ph \/ ps) <-> (ps \/ ph))
87mobii 1801 . . . . . . 7 |- (E*x(ph \/ ps) <-> E*x(ps \/ ph))
9 moor 1821 . . . . . . 7 |- (E*x(ps \/ ph) -> E*xps)
108, 9sylbi 216 . . . . . 6 |- (E*x(ph \/ ps) -> E*xps)
116, 10syl 12 . . . . 5 |- (E!x(ph \/ ps) -> E*xps)
1211a1i 8 . . . 4 |- (-. E.xph -> (E!x(ph \/ ps) -> E*xps))
135, 12jcad 661 . . 3 |- (-. E.xph -> (E!x(ph \/ ps) -> (E.xps /\ E*xps)))
14 eu5 1805 . . 3 |- (E!xps <-> (E.xps /\ E*xps))
1513, 14syl6ibr 230 . 2 |- (-. E.xph -> (E!x(ph \/ ps) -> E!xps))
16 hbe1 1363 . . . . 5 |- (E.xph -> A.xE.xph)
1716euor 1793 . . . 4 |- ((-. E.xph /\ E!xps) -> E!x(E.xph \/ ps))
18 euex 1788 . . . . . 6 |- (E!xps -> E.xps)
19 olc 290 . . . . . . 7 |- (ps -> (ph \/ ps))
2019eximi 1387 . . . . . 6 |- (E.xps -> E.x(ph \/ ps))
21 19.8a 1376 . . . . . . . . 9 |- (ph -> E.xph)
2221orim1i 364 . . . . . . . 8 |- ((ph \/ ps) -> (E.xph \/ ps))
2322ax-gen 1305 . . . . . . 7 |- A.x((ph \/ ps) -> (E.xph \/ ps))
24 euim 1817 . . . . . . 7 |- ((E.x(ph \/ ps) /\ A.x((ph \/ ps) -> (E.xph \/ ps))) -> (E!x(E.xph \/ ps) -> E!x(ph \/ ps)))
2523, 24mpan2 760 . . . . . 6 |- (E.x(ph \/ ps) -> (E!x(E.xph \/ ps) -> E!x(ph \/ ps)))
2618, 20, 253syl 24 . . . . 5 |- (E!xps -> (E!x(E.xph \/ ps) -> E!x(ph \/ ps)))
2726adantl 424 . . . 4 |- ((-. E.xph /\ E!xps) -> (E!x(E.xph \/ ps) -> E!x(ph \/ ps)))
2817, 27mpd 29 . . 3 |- ((-. E.xph /\ E!xps) -> E!x(ph \/ ps))
2928ex 402 . 2 |- (-. E.xph -> (E!xps -> E!x(ph \/ ps)))
3015, 29impbid 574 1 |- (-. E.xph -> (E!x(ph \/ ps) <-> E!xps))
Colors of variables: wff set class
Syntax hints:  -. wn 2   -> wi 3   <-> wb 163   \/ wo 239   /\ wa 240  A.wal 1296  E.wex 1326  E!weu 1771  E*wmo 1772
This theorem was proved from axioms:  ax-1 4  ax-2 5  ax-3 6  ax-mp 7  ax-7 1304  ax-gen 1305  ax-8 1306  ax-9 1307  ax-10 1308  ax-11 1309  ax-12 1310  ax-17 1317  ax-4 1319  ax-5o 1321  ax-6o 1324  ax-9o 1481  ax-10o 1500  ax-16 1580  ax-11o 1588
This theorem depends on definitions:  df-bi 164  df-or 241  df-an 242  df-ex 1327  df-sb 1536  df-eu 1775  df-mo 1776
Copyright terms: Public domain