Theorem dfoprab3s 6839

Description: A way to define an operation class abstraction without using existential quantifiers. (Contributed by NM, 18-Aug-2006.) (Revised by Mario Carneiro, 31-Aug-2015.)

Assertion

Ref	Expression
dfoprab3s	|- { <. <. x , y >. , z >. | ph } = { <. w , z >. | ( w e. ( _V X. _V ) /\ [. ( 1st ` w ) / x ]. [. ( 2nd ` w ) / y ]. ph ) }

Distinct variable groups:   ph, w   x, y, z, w

Allowed substitution hints:   ph( x, y, z)

Proof of Theorem dfoprab3s

Step	Hyp	Ref	Expression
1		dfoprab2 6327	. 2 |- { <. <. x , y >. , z >. | ph } = { <. w , z >. | E. x E. y ( w = <. x , y >. /\ ph ) }
2		nfsbc1v 3351	. . . . 5 |- F/ x [. ( 1st ` w ) / x ]. [. ( 2nd ` w ) / y ]. ph
3	2	19.41 1920	. . . 4 |- ( E. x ( E. y w = <. x , y >. /\ [. ( 1st ` w ) / x ]. [. ( 2nd ` w ) / y ]. ph ) <-> ( E. x E. y w = <. x , y >. /\ [. ( 1st ` w ) / x ]. [. ( 2nd ` w ) / y ]. ph ) )
4		sbcopeq1a 6836	. . . . . . . 8 |- ( w = <. x , y >. -> ( [. ( 1st ` w ) / x ]. [. ( 2nd ` w ) / y ]. ph <-> ph ) )
5	4	pm5.32i 637	. . . . . . 7 |- ( ( w = <. x , y >. /\ [. ( 1st ` w ) / x ]. [. ( 2nd ` w ) / y ]. ph ) <-> ( w = <. x , y >. /\ ph ) )
6	5	exbii 1644	. . . . . 6 |- ( E. y ( w = <. x , y >. /\ [. ( 1st ` w ) / x ]. [. ( 2nd ` w ) / y ]. ph ) <-> E. y ( w = <. x , y >. /\ ph ) )
7		nfcv 2629	. . . . . . . 8 |- F/_ y ( 1st ` w )
8		nfsbc1v 3351	. . . . . . . 8 |- F/ y [. ( 2nd ` w ) / y ]. ph
9	7, 8	nfsbc 3353	. . . . . . 7 |- F/ y [. ( 1st ` w ) / x ]. [. ( 2nd ` w ) / y ]. ph
10	9	19.41 1920	. . . . . 6 |- ( E. y ( w = <. x , y >. /\ [. ( 1st ` w ) / x ]. [. ( 2nd ` w ) / y ]. ph ) <-> ( E. y w = <. x , y >. /\ [. ( 1st ` w ) / x ]. [. ( 2nd ` w ) / y ]. ph ) )
11	6, 10	bitr3i 251	. . . . 5 |- ( E. y ( w = <. x , y >. /\ ph ) <-> ( E. y w = <. x , y >. /\ [. ( 1st ` w ) / x ]. [. ( 2nd ` w ) / y ]. ph ) )
12	11	exbii 1644	. . . 4 |- ( E. x E. y ( w = <. x , y >. /\ ph ) <-> E. x ( E. y w = <. x , y >. /\ [. ( 1st ` w ) / x ]. [. ( 2nd ` w ) / y ]. ph ) )
13		elvv 5058	. . . . 5 |- ( w e. ( _V X. _V ) <-> E. x E. y w = <. x , y >. )
14	13	anbi1i 695	. . . 4 |- ( ( w e. ( _V X. _V ) /\ [. ( 1st ` w ) / x ]. [. ( 2nd ` w ) / y ]. ph ) <-> ( E. x E. y w = <. x , y >. /\ [. ( 1st ` w ) / x ]. [. ( 2nd ` w ) / y ]. ph ) )
15	3, 12, 14	3bitr4i 277	. . 3 |- ( E. x E. y ( w = <. x , y >. /\ ph ) <-> ( w e. ( _V X. _V ) /\ [. ( 1st ` w ) / x ]. [. ( 2nd ` w ) / y ]. ph ) )
16	15	opabbii 4511	. 2 |- { <. w , z >. | E. x E. y ( w = <. x , y >. /\ ph ) } = { <. w , z >. | ( w e. ( _V X. _V ) /\ [. ( 1st ` w ) / x ]. [. ( 2nd ` w ) / y ]. ph ) }
17	1, 16	eqtri 2496	1 |- { <. <. x , y >. , z >. | ph } = { <. w , z >. | ( w e. ( _V X. _V ) /\ [. ( 1st ` w ) / x ]. [. ( 2nd ` w ) / y ]. ph ) }

Syntax hints:   /\ wa 369   = wceq 1379   E.wex 1596   e. wcel 1767   _Vcvv 3113   [.wsbc 3331   <.cop 4033   {copab 4504   X. cxp 4997   ` cfv 5588   {coprab 6285   1stc1st 6782   2ndc2nd 6783

This theorem was proved from axioms:  ax-mp 5  ax-1 6  ax-2 7  ax-3 8  ax-gen 1601  ax-4 1612  ax-5 1680  ax-6 1719  ax-7 1739  ax-8 1769  ax-9 1771  ax-10 1786  ax-11 1791  ax-12 1803  ax-13 1968  ax-ext 2445  ax-sep 4568  ax-nul 4576  ax-pow 4625  ax-pr 4686  ax-un 6576

This theorem depends on definitions:  df-bi 185  df-or 370  df-an 371  df-3an 975  df-tru 1382  df-ex 1597  df-nf 1600  df-sb 1712  df-eu 2279  df-mo 2280  df-clab 2453  df-cleq 2459  df-clel 2462  df-nfc 2617  df-ne 2664  df-ral 2819  df-rex 2820  df-rab 2823  df-v 3115  df-sbc 3332  df-dif 3479  df-un 3481  df-in 3483  df-ss 3490  df-nul 3786  df-if 3940  df-sn 4028  df-pr 4030  df-op 4034  df-uni 4246  df-br 4448  df-opab 4506  df-mpt 4507  df-id 4795  df-xp 5005  df-rel 5006  df-cnv 5007  df-co 5008  df-dm 5009  df-rn 5010  df-iota 5551  df-fun 5590  df-fv 5596  df-oprab 6288  df-1st 6784  df-2nd 6785

This theorem is referenced by:  dfoprab3  6840