Theorem dfoprab3s 6862

Description: A way to define an operation class abstraction without using existential quantifiers. (Contributed by NM, 18-Aug-2006.) (Revised by Mario Carneiro, 31-Aug-2015.)

Assertion

Ref	Expression
dfoprab3s	|- { <. <. x , y >. , z >. | ph } = { <. w , z >. | ( w e. ( _V X. _V ) /\ [. ( 1st ` w ) / x ]. [. ( 2nd ` w ) / y ]. ph ) }

Distinct variable groups:   ph, w   x, y, z, w

Allowed substitution hints:   ph( x, y, z)

Proof of Theorem dfoprab3s

Step	Hyp	Ref	Expression
1		dfoprab2 6351	. 2 |- { <. <. x , y >. , z >. | ph } = { <. w , z >. | E. x E. y ( w = <. x , y >. /\ ph ) }
2		nfsbc1v 3325	. . . . 5 |- F/ x [. ( 1st ` w ) / x ]. [. ( 2nd ` w ) / y ]. ph
3	2	19.41 2028	. . . 4 |- ( E. x ( E. y w = <. x , y >. /\ [. ( 1st ` w ) / x ]. [. ( 2nd ` w ) / y ]. ph ) <-> ( E. x E. y w = <. x , y >. /\ [. ( 1st ` w ) / x ]. [. ( 2nd ` w ) / y ]. ph ) )
4		sbcopeq1a 6859	. . . . . . . 8 |- ( w = <. x , y >. -> ( [. ( 1st ` w ) / x ]. [. ( 2nd ` w ) / y ]. ph <-> ph ) )
5	4	pm5.32i 641	. . . . . . 7 |- ( ( w = <. x , y >. /\ [. ( 1st ` w ) / x ]. [. ( 2nd ` w ) / y ]. ph ) <-> ( w = <. x , y >. /\ ph ) )
6	5	exbii 1714	. . . . . 6 |- ( E. y ( w = <. x , y >. /\ [. ( 1st ` w ) / x ]. [. ( 2nd ` w ) / y ]. ph ) <-> E. y ( w = <. x , y >. /\ ph ) )
7		nfcv 2591	. . . . . . . 8 |- F/_ y ( 1st ` w )
8		nfsbc1v 3325	. . . . . . . 8 |- F/ y [. ( 2nd ` w ) / y ]. ph
9	7, 8	nfsbc 3327	. . . . . . 7 |- F/ y [. ( 1st ` w ) / x ]. [. ( 2nd ` w ) / y ]. ph
10	9	19.41 2028	. . . . . 6 |- ( E. y ( w = <. x , y >. /\ [. ( 1st ` w ) / x ]. [. ( 2nd ` w ) / y ]. ph ) <-> ( E. y w = <. x , y >. /\ [. ( 1st ` w ) / x ]. [. ( 2nd ` w ) / y ]. ph ) )
11	6, 10	bitr3i 254	. . . . 5 |- ( E. y ( w = <. x , y >. /\ ph ) <-> ( E. y w = <. x , y >. /\ [. ( 1st ` w ) / x ]. [. ( 2nd ` w ) / y ]. ph ) )
12	11	exbii 1714	. . . 4 |- ( E. x E. y ( w = <. x , y >. /\ ph ) <-> E. x ( E. y w = <. x , y >. /\ [. ( 1st ` w ) / x ]. [. ( 2nd ` w ) / y ]. ph ) )
13		elvv 4913	. . . . 5 |- ( w e. ( _V X. _V ) <-> E. x E. y w = <. x , y >. )
14	13	anbi1i 699	. . . 4 |- ( ( w e. ( _V X. _V ) /\ [. ( 1st ` w ) / x ]. [. ( 2nd ` w ) / y ]. ph ) <-> ( E. x E. y w = <. x , y >. /\ [. ( 1st ` w ) / x ]. [. ( 2nd ` w ) / y ]. ph ) )
15	3, 12, 14	3bitr4i 280	. . 3 |- ( E. x E. y ( w = <. x , y >. /\ ph ) <-> ( w e. ( _V X. _V ) /\ [. ( 1st ` w ) / x ]. [. ( 2nd ` w ) / y ]. ph ) )
16	15	opabbii 4490	. 2 |- { <. w , z >. | E. x E. y ( w = <. x , y >. /\ ph ) } = { <. w , z >. | ( w e. ( _V X. _V ) /\ [. ( 1st ` w ) / x ]. [. ( 2nd ` w ) / y ]. ph ) }
17	1, 16	eqtri 2458	1 |- { <. <. x , y >. , z >. | ph } = { <. w , z >. | ( w e. ( _V X. _V ) /\ [. ( 1st ` w ) / x ]. [. ( 2nd ` w ) / y ]. ph ) }

Syntax hints:   /\ wa 370   = wceq 1437   E.wex 1659   e. wcel 1870   _Vcvv 3087   [.wsbc 3305   <.cop 4008   {copab 4483   X. cxp 4852   ` cfv 5601   {coprab 6306   1stc1st 6805   2ndc2nd 6806

This theorem was proved from axioms:  ax-mp 5  ax-1 6  ax-2 7  ax-3 8  ax-gen 1665  ax-4 1678  ax-5 1751  ax-6 1797  ax-7 1841  ax-8 1872  ax-9 1874  ax-10 1889  ax-11 1894  ax-12 1907  ax-13 2055  ax-ext 2407  ax-sep 4548  ax-nul 4556  ax-pow 4603  ax-pr 4661  ax-un 6597

This theorem depends on definitions:  df-bi 188  df-or 371  df-an 372  df-3an 984  df-tru 1440  df-ex 1660  df-nf 1664  df-sb 1790  df-eu 2270  df-mo 2271  df-clab 2415  df-cleq 2421  df-clel 2424  df-nfc 2579  df-ne 2627  df-ral 2787  df-rex 2788  df-rab 2791  df-v 3089  df-sbc 3306  df-dif 3445  df-un 3447  df-in 3449  df-ss 3456  df-nul 3768  df-if 3916  df-sn 4003  df-pr 4005  df-op 4009  df-uni 4223  df-br 4427  df-opab 4485  df-mpt 4486  df-id 4769  df-xp 4860  df-rel 4861  df-cnv 4862  df-co 4863  df-dm 4864  df-rn 4865  df-iota 5565  df-fun 5603  df-fv 5609  df-oprab 6309  df-1st 6807  df-2nd 6808

This theorem is referenced by:  dfoprab3  6863