Theorem dfdfat2 31638

Description: Alternate definition of the predicate "defined at" not using the Fun predicate. (Contributed by Alexander van der Vekens, 22-Jul-2017.)

Assertion

Ref	Expression
dfdfat2	|- ( F defAt A <-> ( A e. dom F /\ E! y A F y ) )

Distinct variable groups:   y, A   y, F

Proof of Theorem dfdfat2

Dummy variable x is distinct from all other variables.

Step	Hyp	Ref	Expression
1		df-dfat 31623	. 2 |- ( F defAt A <-> ( A e. dom F /\ Fun ( F |` { A } ) ) )
2		relres 5292	. . . 4 |- Rel ( F |` { A } )
3		dffun8 5606	. . . 4 |- ( Fun ( F |` { A } ) <-> ( Rel ( F |` { A } ) /\ A. x e. dom ( F |` { A } ) E! y x ( F |` { A } ) y ) )
4	2, 3	mpbiran 911	. . 3 |- ( Fun ( F |` { A } ) <-> A. x e. dom ( F |` { A } ) E! y x ( F |` { A } ) y )
5	4	anbi2i 694	. 2 |- ( ( A e. dom F /\ Fun ( F |` { A } ) ) <-> ( A e. dom F /\ A. x e. dom ( F |` { A } ) E! y x ( F |` { A } ) y ) )
6		vex 3109	. . . . . . . 8 |- y e. _V
7	6	brres 5271	. . . . . . 7 |- ( x ( F |` { A } ) y <-> ( x F y /\ x e. { A } ) )
8	7	a1i 11	. . . . . 6 |- ( A e. dom F -> ( x ( F |` { A } ) y <-> ( x F y /\ x e. { A } ) ) )
9	8	eubidv 2291	. . . . 5 |- ( A e. dom F -> ( E! y x ( F |` { A } ) y <-> E! y ( x F y /\ x e. { A } ) ) )
10	9	ralbidv 2896	. . . 4 |- ( A e. dom F -> ( A. x e. dom ( F |` { A } ) E! y x ( F |` { A } ) y <-> A. x e. dom ( F |` { A } ) E! y ( x F y /\ x e. { A } ) ) )
11		eldmressnsn 5304	. . . . 5 |- ( A e. dom F -> A e. dom ( F |` { A } ) )
12		eldmressn 31630	. . . . 5 |- ( x e. dom ( F |` { A } ) -> x = A )
13		breq1 4443	. . . . . . . 8 |- ( x = A -> ( x F y <-> A F y ) )
14	13	anbi1d 704	. . . . . . 7 |- ( x = A -> ( ( x F y /\ x e. { A } ) <-> ( A F y /\ x e. { A } ) ) )
15		elsn 4034	. . . . . . . . 9 |- ( x e. { A } <-> x = A )
16	15	biimpri 206	. . . . . . . 8 |- ( x = A -> x e. { A } )
17	16	biantrud 507	. . . . . . 7 |- ( x = A -> ( A F y <-> ( A F y /\ x e. { A } ) ) )
18	14, 17	bitr4d 256	. . . . . 6 |- ( x = A -> ( ( x F y /\ x e. { A } ) <-> A F y ) )
19	18	eubidv 2291	. . . . 5 |- ( x = A -> ( E! y ( x F y /\ x e. { A } ) <-> E! y A F y ) )
20	11, 12, 19	ralbinrald 31626	. . . 4 |- ( A e. dom F -> ( A. x e. dom ( F |` { A } ) E! y ( x F y /\ x e. { A } ) <-> E! y A F y ) )
21	10, 20	bitrd 253	. . 3 |- ( A e. dom F -> ( A. x e. dom ( F |` { A } ) E! y x ( F |` { A } ) y <-> E! y A F y ) )
22	21	pm5.32i 637	. 2 |- ( ( A e. dom F /\ A. x e. dom ( F |` { A } ) E! y x ( F |` { A } ) y ) <-> ( A e. dom F /\ E! y A F y ) )
23	1, 5, 22	3bitri 271	1 |- ( F defAt A <-> ( A e. dom F /\ E! y A F y ) )

Syntax hints:   <-> wb 184   /\ wa 369   = wceq 1374   e. wcel 1762   E!weu 2268   A.wral 2807   {csn 4020   class class class wbr 4440   dom cdm 4992   |` cres 4994   Rel wrel 4997   Fun wfun 5573   defAt wdfat 31620

This theorem was proved from axioms:  ax-mp 5  ax-1 6  ax-2 7  ax-3 8  ax-gen 1596  ax-4 1607  ax-5 1675  ax-6 1714  ax-7 1734  ax-9 1766  ax-10 1781  ax-11 1786  ax-12 1798  ax-13 1961  ax-ext 2438  ax-sep 4561  ax-nul 4569  ax-pr 4679

This theorem depends on definitions:  df-bi 185  df-or 370  df-an 371  df-3an 970  df-tru 1377  df-ex 1592  df-nf 1595  df-sb 1707  df-eu 2272  df-mo 2273  df-clab 2446  df-cleq 2452  df-clel 2455  df-nfc 2610  df-ne 2657  df-ral 2812  df-rex 2813  df-rab 2816  df-v 3108  df-dif 3472  df-un 3474  df-in 3476  df-ss 3483  df-nul 3779  df-if 3933  df-sn 4021  df-pr 4023  df-op 4027  df-br 4441  df-opab 4499  df-id 4788  df-xp 4998  df-rel 4999  df-cnv 5000  df-co 5001  df-dm 5002  df-res 5004  df-fun 5581  df-dfat 31623

This theorem is referenced by:  afveu  31660  rlimdmafv  31684