HomeHome Metamath Proof Explorer < Previous   Next >
Related theorems
Unicode version

Theorem dedlembOLD 840
Description: Lemma for weak deduction theorem.
Assertion
Ref Expression
dedlembOLD |- (-. ph -> (ch <-> ((ps /\ ph) \/ (ch /\ -. ph))))

Proof of Theorem dedlembOLD
StepHypRef Expression
1 olc 290 . . 3 |- ((ch /\ -. ph) -> ((ps /\ ph) \/ (ch /\ -. ph)))
21expcom 403 . 2 |- (-. ph -> (ch -> ((ps /\ ph) \/ (ch /\ -. ph))))
3 pm2.21 92 . . . . 5 |- (-. ph -> (ph -> (ps -> ch)))
43com23 36 . . . 4 |- (-. ph -> (ps -> (ph -> ch)))
54imp3a 388 . . 3 |- (-. ph -> ((ps /\ ph) -> ch))
6 simpl 346 . . . 4 |- ((ch /\ -. ph) -> ch)
76a1i 8 . . 3 |- (-. ph -> ((ch /\ -. ph) -> ch))
85, 7jaod 469 . 2 |- (-. ph -> (((ps /\ ph) \/ (ch /\ -. ph)) -> ch))
92, 8impbid 574 1 |- (-. ph -> (ch <-> ((ps /\ ph) \/ (ch /\ -. ph))))
Colors of variables: wff set class
Syntax hints:  -. wn 2   -> wi 3   <-> wb 163   \/ wo 239   /\ wa 240
This theorem was proved from axioms:  ax-1 4  ax-2 5  ax-3 6  ax-mp 7
This theorem depends on definitions:  df-bi 164  df-or 241  df-an 242
Copyright terms: Public domain