Syntax Definition cv 1297

Description: This syntax construction states that a variable x, which has been declared to be a set variable by $f statement vx, is also a class expression. This can be justified informally as follows. We know that the class builder {y | y e. x} is a class by cab 1871. Since (when y is distinct from x) we have x = {y | y e. x} by cvjust 1879, we can argue that that the syntax "class x " can be viewed as an abbreviation for "class {y | y e. x}". See the discussion under the definition of class in [Jech] p. 4 showing that "Every set can be considered to be a class."

While it is tempting and perhaps occasionally useful to view cv 1297 as a "type conversion" from a set variable to a class variable, keep in mind that cv 1297 is intrinsically no different from any other class-building syntax such as cab 1871, cun 2591, or c0 2875.

(The description above applies to set theory, not predicate calculus. The purpose of introducing class x here, and not in set theory where it belongs, is to allow us to express i.e. "prove" the weq 1299 of predicate calculus from the wceq 1298 of set theory, so that we don't "overload" the = connective with two syntax definitions. This is done to prevent ambiguity that would complicate some Metamath parsers.)

Hypothesis

Ref	Expression
vx	set x

Assertion

Ref	Expression
cv	class x

This syntax is primitive. The first axiom using it is ax-5 1302.

Copyright terms: Public domain