Theorem csbfv12gALTOLD 37071

Description: Move class substitution in and out of a function value. The proof is derived from the virtual deduction proof csbfv12gALTVD 37154. (Contributed by Alan Sare, 10-Nov-2012.) Obsolete as of 20-Aug-2018. Use csbfv12 5912 instead. (Proof modification is discouraged.) (New usage is discouraged.)

Assertion

Ref	Expression
csbfv12gALTOLD	|- ( A e. C -> [_ A / x ]_ ( F ` B ) = ( [_ A / x ]_ F ` [_ A / x ]_ B ) )

Proof of Theorem csbfv12gALTOLD

Dummy variable y is distinct from all other variables.

Step	Hyp	Ref	Expression
1		csbunigOLD 37070	. . 3 |- ( A e. C -> [_ A / x ]_ U. { y | ( F " { B } ) = { y } } = U. [_ A / x ]_ { y | ( F " { B } ) = { y } } )
2		csbabgOLD 37069	. . . . 5 |- ( A e. C -> [_ A / x ]_ { y | ( F " { B } ) = { y } } = { y | [. A / x ]. ( F " { B } ) = { y } } )
3		sbceqg 3801	. . . . . . 7 |- ( A e. C -> ( [. A / x ]. ( F " { B } ) = { y } <-> [_ A / x ]_ ( F " { B } ) = [_ A / x ]_ { y } ) )
4		csbima12gOLD 5201	. . . . . . . . 9 |- ( A e. C -> [_ A / x ]_ ( F " { B } ) = ( [_ A / x ]_ F " [_ A / x ]_ { B } ) )
5		csbsng 4055	. . . . . . . . . 10 |- ( A e. C -> [_ A / x ]_ { B } = { [_ A / x ]_ B } )
6	5	imaeq2d 5183	. . . . . . . . 9 |- ( A e. C -> ( [_ A / x ]_ F " [_ A / x ]_ { B } ) = ( [_ A / x ]_ F " { [_ A / x ]_ B } ) )
7	4, 6	eqtrd 2463	. . . . . . . 8 |- ( A e. C -> [_ A / x ]_ ( F " { B } ) = ( [_ A / x ]_ F " { [_ A / x ]_ B } ) )
8		csbconstg 3408	. . . . . . . 8 |- ( A e. C -> [_ A / x ]_ { y } = { y } )
9	7, 8	eqeq12d 2444	. . . . . . 7 |- ( A e. C -> ( [_ A / x ]_ ( F " { B } ) = [_ A / x ]_ { y } <-> ( [_ A / x ]_ F " { [_ A / x ]_ B } ) = { y } ) )
10	3, 9	bitrd 256	. . . . . 6 |- ( A e. C -> ( [. A / x ]. ( F " { B } ) = { y } <-> ( [_ A / x ]_ F " { [_ A / x ]_ B } ) = { y } ) )
11	10	abbidv 2558	. . . . 5 |- ( A e. C -> { y | [. A / x ]. ( F " { B } ) = { y } } = { y | ( [_ A / x ]_ F " { [_ A / x ]_ B } ) = { y } } )
12	2, 11	eqtrd 2463	. . . 4 |- ( A e. C -> [_ A / x ]_ { y | ( F " { B } ) = { y } } = { y | ( [_ A / x ]_ F " { [_ A / x ]_ B } ) = { y } } )
13	12	unieqd 4226	. . 3 |- ( A e. C -> U. [_ A / x ]_ { y | ( F " { B } ) = { y } } = U. { y | ( [_ A / x ]_ F " { [_ A / x ]_ B } ) = { y } } )
14	1, 13	eqtrd 2463	. 2 |- ( A e. C -> [_ A / x ]_ U. { y | ( F " { B } ) = { y } } = U. { y | ( [_ A / x ]_ F " { [_ A / x ]_ B } ) = { y } } )
15		dffv4 5874	. . 3 |- ( F ` B ) = U. { y | ( F " { B } ) = { y } }
16	15	csbeq2i 3810	. 2 |- [_ A / x ]_ ( F ` B ) = [_ A / x ]_ U. { y | ( F " { B } ) = { y } }
17		dffv4 5874	. 2 |- ( [_ A / x ]_ F ` [_ A / x ]_ B ) = U. { y | ( [_ A / x ]_ F " { [_ A / x ]_ B } ) = { y } }
18	14, 16, 17	3eqtr4g 2488	1 |- ( A e. C -> [_ A / x ]_ ( F ` B ) = ( [_ A / x ]_ F ` [_ A / x ]_ B ) )

Syntax hints:   -> wi 4   = wceq 1437   e. wcel 1868   {cab 2407   [.wsbc 3299   [_csb 3395   {csn 3996   U.cuni 4216   "cima 4852   ` cfv 5597

This theorem was proved from axioms:  ax-mp 5  ax-1 6  ax-2 7  ax-3 8  ax-gen 1665  ax-4 1678  ax-5 1748  ax-6 1794  ax-7 1839  ax-8 1870  ax-9 1872  ax-10 1887  ax-11 1892  ax-12 1905  ax-13 2053  ax-ext 2400  ax-sep 4543  ax-nul 4551  ax-pow 4598  ax-pr 4656

This theorem depends on definitions:  df-bi 188  df-or 371  df-an 372  df-3an 984  df-tru 1440  df-fal 1443  df-ex 1660  df-nf 1664  df-sb 1787  df-eu 2269  df-mo 2270  df-clab 2408  df-cleq 2414  df-clel 2417  df-nfc 2572  df-ne 2620  df-ral 2780  df-rex 2781  df-rab 2784  df-v 3083  df-sbc 3300  df-csb 3396  df-dif 3439  df-un 3441  df-in 3443  df-ss 3450  df-nul 3762  df-if 3910  df-sn 3997  df-pr 3999  df-op 4003  df-uni 4217  df-br 4421  df-opab 4480  df-xp 4855  df-cnv 4857  df-dm 4859  df-rn 4860  df-res 4861  df-ima 4862  df-iota 5561  df-fv 5605

This theorem is referenced by: (None)