HomeHome Metamath Proof Explorer < Previous   Next >
Related theorems
Unicode version

Theorem cla4gfOLD 2363
Description: Rule of specialization, using implicit substitition. Compare Theorem 7.3 of [Quine] p. 44.
Hypotheses
Ref Expression
cla4gf.1 |- (y e. A -> A.x y e. A)
cla4gf.2 |- (ps -> A.xps)
cla4gf.3 |- (x = A -> (ph <-> ps))
Assertion
Ref Expression
cla4gfOLD |- (A e. B -> (A.xph -> ps))
Distinct variable groups:   y,A   x,y

Proof of Theorem cla4gfOLD
StepHypRef Expression
1 elisset 2299 . 2 |- (A e. B -> A e. _V)
2 isset 2296 . . . . 5 |- (A e. _V <-> E.y y = A)
3 cla4gf.1 . . . . . . 7 |- (y e. A -> A.x y e. A)
43hbeleq 1997 . . . . . 6 |- (y = A -> A.x y = A)
5 ax-17 1317 . . . . . 6 |- (x = A -> A.y x = A)
6 eqeq1 1890 . . . . . 6 |- (y = x -> (y = A <-> x = A))
74, 5, 6cbvex 1529 . . . . 5 |- (E.y y = A <-> E.x x = A)
82, 7bitri 190 . . . 4 |- (A e. _V <-> E.x x = A)
9 cla4gf.3 . . . . . 6 |- (x = A -> (ph <-> ps))
109biimpd 170 . . . . 5 |- (x = A -> (ph -> ps))
1110eximi 1387 . . . 4 |- (E.x x = A -> E.x(ph -> ps))
128, 11sylbi 216 . . 3 |- (A e. _V -> E.x(ph -> ps))
13 cla4gf.2 . . . 4 |- (ps -> A.xps)
141319.36 1429 . . 3 |- (E.x(ph -> ps) <-> (A.xph -> ps))
1512, 14sylib 215 . 2 |- (A e. _V -> (A.xph -> ps))
161, 15syl 12 1 |- (A e. B -> (A.xph -> ps))
Colors of variables: wff set class
Syntax hints:   -> wi 3   <-> wb 163  A.wal 1296   = wceq 1298   e. wcel 1300  E.wex 1326  _Vcvv 2292
This theorem was proved from axioms:  ax-1 4  ax-2 5  ax-3 6  ax-mp 7  ax-7 1304  ax-gen 1305  ax-8 1306  ax-9 1307  ax-10 1308  ax-11 1309  ax-12 1310  ax-17 1317  ax-4 1319  ax-5o 1321  ax-6o 1324  ax-9o 1481  ax-10o 1500  ax-16 1580  ax-11o 1588  ax-ext 1865
This theorem depends on definitions:  df-bi 164  df-or 241  df-an 242  df-ex 1327  df-sb 1536  df-clab 1872  df-cleq 1877  df-clel 1880  df-v 2294
Copyright terms: Public domain