Theorem cbvoprab2 6365

Description: Change the second bound variable in an operation abstraction. (Contributed by Jeff Madsen, 11-Jun-2010.) (Revised by Mario Carneiro, 11-Dec-2016.)

Hypotheses

Ref	Expression
cbvoprab2.1	|- F/ w ph
cbvoprab2.2	|- F/ y ps
cbvoprab2.3	|- ( y = w -> ( ph <-> ps ) )

Assertion

Ref	Expression
cbvoprab2	|- { <. <. x , y >. , z >. | ph } = { <. <. x , w >. , z >. | ps }

Distinct variable group:   x, w, y, z

Allowed substitution hints:   ph( x, y, z, w)   ps( x, y, z, w)

Proof of Theorem cbvoprab2

Dummy variable v is distinct from all other variables.

Step	Hyp	Ref	Expression
1		nfv 1683	. . . . . . 7 |- F/ w v = <. <. x , y >. , z >.
2		cbvoprab2.1	. . . . . . 7 |- F/ w ph
3	1, 2	nfan 1875	. . . . . 6 |- F/ w ( v = <. <. x , y >. , z >. /\ ph )
4	3	nfex 1895	. . . . 5 |- F/ w E. z ( v = <. <. x , y >. , z >. /\ ph )
5		nfv 1683	. . . . . . 7 |- F/ y v = <. <. x , w >. , z >.
6		cbvoprab2.2	. . . . . . 7 |- F/ y ps
7	5, 6	nfan 1875	. . . . . 6 |- F/ y ( v = <. <. x , w >. , z >. /\ ps )
8	7	nfex 1895	. . . . 5 |- F/ y E. z ( v = <. <. x , w >. , z >. /\ ps )
9		opeq2 4220	. . . . . . . . 9 |- ( y = w -> <. x , y >. = <. x , w >. )
10	9	opeq1d 4225	. . . . . . . 8 |- ( y = w -> <. <. x , y >. , z >. = <. <. x , w >. , z >. )
11	10	eqeq2d 2481	. . . . . . 7 |- ( y = w -> ( v = <. <. x , y >. , z >. <-> v = <. <. x , w >. , z >. ) )
12		cbvoprab2.3	. . . . . . 7 |- ( y = w -> ( ph <-> ps ) )
13	11, 12	anbi12d 710	. . . . . 6 |- ( y = w -> ( ( v = <. <. x , y >. , z >. /\ ph ) <-> ( v = <. <. x , w >. , z >. /\ ps ) ) )
14	13	exbidv 1690	. . . . 5 |- ( y = w -> ( E. z ( v = <. <. x , y >. , z >. /\ ph ) <-> E. z ( v = <. <. x , w >. , z >. /\ ps ) ) )
15	4, 8, 14	cbvex 1995	. . . 4 |- ( E. y E. z ( v = <. <. x , y >. , z >. /\ ph ) <-> E. w E. z ( v = <. <. x , w >. , z >. /\ ps ) )
16	15	exbii 1644	. . 3 |- ( E. x E. y E. z ( v = <. <. x , y >. , z >. /\ ph ) <-> E. x E. w E. z ( v = <. <. x , w >. , z >. /\ ps ) )
17	16	abbii 2601	. 2 |- { v | E. x E. y E. z ( v = <. <. x , y >. , z >. /\ ph ) } = { v | E. x E. w E. z ( v = <. <. x , w >. , z >. /\ ps ) }
18		df-oprab 6299	. 2 |- { <. <. x , y >. , z >. | ph } = { v | E. x E. y E. z ( v = <. <. x , y >. , z >. /\ ph ) }
19		df-oprab 6299	. 2 |- { <. <. x , w >. , z >. | ps } = { v | E. x E. w E. z ( v = <. <. x , w >. , z >. /\ ps ) }
20	17, 18, 19	3eqtr4i 2506	1 |- { <. <. x , y >. , z >. | ph } = { <. <. x , w >. , z >. | ps }

Syntax hints:   -> wi 4   <-> wb 184   /\ wa 369   = wceq 1379   E.wex 1596   F/wnf 1599   {cab 2452   <.cop 4039   {coprab 6296

This theorem was proved from axioms:  ax-mp 5  ax-1 6  ax-2 7  ax-3 8  ax-gen 1601  ax-4 1612  ax-5 1680  ax-6 1719  ax-7 1739  ax-10 1786  ax-11 1791  ax-12 1803  ax-13 1968  ax-ext 2445

This theorem depends on definitions:  df-bi 185  df-or 370  df-an 371  df-3an 975  df-tru 1382  df-ex 1597  df-nf 1600  df-sb 1712  df-clab 2453  df-cleq 2459  df-clel 2462  df-nfc 2617  df-rab 2826  df-v 3120  df-dif 3484  df-un 3486  df-in 3488  df-ss 3495  df-nul 3791  df-if 3946  df-sn 4034  df-pr 4036  df-op 4040  df-oprab 6299

This theorem is referenced by: (None)