Users' Mathboxes Mathbox for Jonathan Ben-Naim < Previous   Next >
Nearby theorems
Mirrors  >  Home  >  MPE Home  >  Th. List  >   Mathboxes  >  bnj1112 Structured version   Unicode version

Theorem bnj1112 32070
Description: Technical lemma for bnj69 32097. This lemma may no longer be used or have become an indirect lemma of the theorem in question (i.e. a lemma of a lemma... of the theorem). (Contributed by Jonathan Ben-Naim, 3-Jun-2011.) (New usage is discouraged.)
Hypothesis
Ref Expression
bnj1112.1  |-  ( ps  <->  A. i  e.  om  ( suc  i  e.  n  ->  ( f `  suc  i )  =  U_ y  e.  ( f `  i )  pred (
y ,  A ,  R ) ) )
Assertion
Ref Expression
bnj1112  |-  ( ps  <->  A. j ( ( j  e.  om  /\  suc  j  e.  n )  ->  ( f `  suc  j )  =  U_ y  e.  ( f `  j )  pred (
y ,  A ,  R ) ) )
Distinct variable groups:    A, i,
j    R, i, j    f,
i, j, y    i, n, j
Allowed substitution hints:    ps( y, f, i, j, n)    A( y, f, n)    R( y,
f, n)

Proof of Theorem bnj1112
StepHypRef Expression
1 bnj1112.1 . . 3  |-  ( ps  <->  A. i  e.  om  ( suc  i  e.  n  ->  ( f `  suc  i )  =  U_ y  e.  ( f `  i )  pred (
y ,  A ,  R ) ) )
21bnj115 31810 . 2  |-  ( ps  <->  A. i ( ( i  e.  om  /\  suc  i  e.  n )  ->  ( f `  suc  i )  =  U_ y  e.  ( f `  i )  pred (
y ,  A ,  R ) ) )
3 eleq1 2503 . . . . 5  |-  ( i  =  j  ->  (
i  e.  om  <->  j  e.  om ) )
4 suceq 4805 . . . . . 6  |-  ( i  =  j  ->  suc  i  =  suc  j )
54eleq1d 2509 . . . . 5  |-  ( i  =  j  ->  ( suc  i  e.  n  <->  suc  j  e.  n ) )
63, 5anbi12d 710 . . . 4  |-  ( i  =  j  ->  (
( i  e.  om  /\ 
suc  i  e.  n
)  <->  ( j  e. 
om  /\  suc  j  e.  n ) ) )
74fveq2d 5716 . . . . 5  |-  ( i  =  j  ->  (
f `  suc  i )  =  ( f `  suc  j ) )
8 fveq2 5712 . . . . . 6  |-  ( i  =  j  ->  (
f `  i )  =  ( f `  j ) )
98bnj1113 31875 . . . . 5  |-  ( i  =  j  ->  U_ y  e.  ( f `  i
)  pred ( y ,  A ,  R )  =  U_ y  e.  ( f `  j
)  pred ( y ,  A ,  R ) )
107, 9eqeq12d 2457 . . . 4  |-  ( i  =  j  ->  (
( f `  suc  i )  =  U_ y  e.  ( f `  i )  pred (
y ,  A ,  R )  <->  ( f `  suc  j )  = 
U_ y  e.  ( f `  j ) 
pred ( y ,  A ,  R ) ) )
116, 10imbi12d 320 . . 3  |-  ( i  =  j  ->  (
( ( i  e. 
om  /\  suc  i  e.  n )  ->  (
f `  suc  i )  =  U_ y  e.  ( f `  i
)  pred ( y ,  A ,  R ) )  <->  ( ( j  e.  om  /\  suc  j  e.  n )  ->  ( f `  suc  j )  =  U_ y  e.  ( f `  j )  pred (
y ,  A ,  R ) ) ) )
1211cbvalv 1971 . 2  |-  ( A. i ( ( i  e.  om  /\  suc  i  e.  n )  ->  ( f `  suc  i )  =  U_ y  e.  ( f `  i )  pred (
y ,  A ,  R ) )  <->  A. j
( ( j  e. 
om  /\  suc  j  e.  n )  ->  (
f `  suc  j )  =  U_ y  e.  ( f `  j
)  pred ( y ,  A ,  R ) ) )
132, 12bitri 249 1  |-  ( ps  <->  A. j ( ( j  e.  om  /\  suc  j  e.  n )  ->  ( f `  suc  j )  =  U_ y  e.  ( f `  j )  pred (
y ,  A ,  R ) ) )
Colors of variables: wff setvar class
Syntax hints:    -> wi 4    <-> wb 184    /\ wa 369   A.wal 1367    = wceq 1369    e. wcel 1756   A.wral 2736   U_ciun 4192   suc csuc 4742   ` cfv 5439   omcom 6497    predc-bnj14 31772
This theorem was proved from axioms:  ax-mp 5  ax-1 6  ax-2 7  ax-3 8  ax-gen 1591  ax-4 1602  ax-5 1670  ax-6 1708  ax-7 1728  ax-10 1775  ax-11 1780  ax-12 1792  ax-13 1943  ax-ext 2423
This theorem depends on definitions:  df-bi 185  df-or 370  df-an 371  df-3an 967  df-tru 1372  df-ex 1587  df-nf 1590  df-sb 1701  df-clab 2430  df-cleq 2436  df-clel 2439  df-nfc 2577  df-ral 2741  df-rex 2742  df-rab 2745  df-v 2995  df-dif 3352  df-un 3354  df-in 3356  df-ss 3363  df-nul 3659  df-if 3813  df-sn 3899  df-pr 3901  df-op 3905  df-uni 4113  df-iun 4194  df-br 4314  df-suc 4746  df-iota 5402  df-fv 5447
This theorem is referenced by:  bnj1118  32071
  Copyright terms: Public domain W3C validator