HomeHome Metamath Proof Explorer < Previous   Next >
Related theorems
Unicode version

Theorem ax9o 1163
Description: Show that the original axiom ax-9o 1164 can be derived from ax-9 1006 and others. See ax9 1165 for the rederivation of ax-9 1006 from ax-9o 1164.

This theorem should not be referenced in any proof. Instead, use ax-9o 1164 below so that uses of ax-9o 1164 can be more easily identified.

Assertion
Ref Expression
ax9o |- (A.x(x = y -> A.xph) -> ph)

Proof of Theorem ax9o
StepHypRef Expression
1 ax-9 1006 . . . 4 |- -. A.x -. x = y
2 df-ex 1022 . . . 4 |- (E.x x = y <-> -. A.x -. x = y)
31, 2mpbir 197 . . 3 |- E.x x = y
4 19.22 1080 . . 3 |- (A.x(x = y -> A.xph) -> (E.x x = y -> E.xA.xph))
53, 4mpi 44 . 2 |- (A.x(x = y -> A.xph) -> E.xA.xph)
6 a6e 1031 . 2 |- (E.xA.xph -> ph)
75, 6syl 10 1 |- (A.x(x = y -> A.xph) -> ph)
Colors of variables: wff set class
Syntax hints:  -. wn 2   -> wi 3  A.wal 995   = wceq 997  E.wex 1021
This theorem was proved from axioms:  ax-1 4  ax-2 5  ax-3 6  ax-mp 7  ax-gen 1004  ax-9 1006  ax-4 1014  ax-5o 1016  ax-6o 1019
This theorem depends on definitions:  df-bi 154  df-an 232  df-ex 1022
Copyright terms: Public domain