Axiom ax-ac2 8893

Description: In order to avoid uses of ax-reg 8107 for derivation of AC equivalents, we provide ax-ac2 8893, which is equivalent to the standard AC of textbooks. This appears to be the shortest known equivalent to the standard AC when expressed in terms of set theory primitives. It was found by Kurt Maes as theorem ackm 8895. We removed the leading quantifier to make it slightly shorter, since we have ax-gen 1669 available. The derivation of ax-ac2 8893 from ax-ac 8889 is shown by theorem axac2 8896, and the reverse derivation by axac 8897. Note that we use ax-reg 8107 to derive ax-ac 8889 from ax-ac2 8893, but not to derive ax-ac2 8893 from ax-ac 8889. (Contributed by NM, 19-Dec-2016.)

Assertion

Ref	Expression
ax-ac2	|- E. y A. z E. v A. u ( ( y e. x /\ ( z e. y -> ( ( v e. x /\ -. y = v ) /\ z e. v ) ) ) \/ ( -. y e. x /\ ( z e. x -> ( ( v e. z /\ v e. y ) /\ ( ( u e. z /\ u e. y ) -> u = v ) ) ) ) )

Distinct variable group:   x, y, z, v, u

Detailed syntax breakdown of Axiom ax-ac2

Step	Hyp	Ref	Expression
1		vy	. . . . . . . 8 setvar y
2		vx	. . . . . . . 8 setvar x
3	1, 2	wel 1888	. . . . . . 7 wff y e. x
4		vz	. . . . . . . . 9 setvar z
5	4, 1	wel 1888	. . . . . . . 8 wff z e. y
6		vv	. . . . . . . . . . 11 setvar v
7	6, 2	wel 1888	. . . . . . . . . 10 wff v e. x
8	1, 6	weq 1791	. . . . . . . . . . 11 wff y = v
9	8	wn 3	. . . . . . . . . 10 wff -. y = v
10	7, 9	wa 371	. . . . . . . . 9 wff ( v e. x /\ -. y = v )
11	4, 6	wel 1888	. . . . . . . . 9 wff z e. v
12	10, 11	wa 371	. . . . . . . 8 wff ( ( v e. x /\ -. y = v ) /\ z e. v )
13	5, 12	wi 4	. . . . . . 7 wff ( z e. y -> ( ( v e. x /\ -. y = v ) /\ z e. v ) )
14	3, 13	wa 371	. . . . . 6 wff ( y e. x /\ ( z e. y -> ( ( v e. x /\ -. y = v ) /\ z e. v ) ) )
15	3	wn 3	. . . . . . 7 wff -. y e. x
16	4, 2	wel 1888	. . . . . . . 8 wff z e. x
17	6, 4	wel 1888	. . . . . . . . . 10 wff v e. z
18	6, 1	wel 1888	. . . . . . . . . 10 wff v e. y
19	17, 18	wa 371	. . . . . . . . 9 wff ( v e. z /\ v e. y )
20		vu	. . . . . . . . . . . 12 setvar u
21	20, 4	wel 1888	. . . . . . . . . . 11 wff u e. z
22	20, 1	wel 1888	. . . . . . . . . . 11 wff u e. y
23	21, 22	wa 371	. . . . . . . . . 10 wff ( u e. z /\ u e. y )
24	20, 6	weq 1791	. . . . . . . . . 10 wff u = v
25	23, 24	wi 4	. . . . . . . . 9 wff ( ( u e. z /\ u e. y ) -> u = v )
26	19, 25	wa 371	. . . . . . . 8 wff ( ( v e. z /\ v e. y ) /\ ( ( u e. z /\ u e. y ) -> u = v ) )
27	16, 26	wi 4	. . . . . . 7 wff ( z e. x -> ( ( v e. z /\ v e. y ) /\ ( ( u e. z /\ u e. y ) -> u = v ) ) )
28	15, 27	wa 371	. . . . . 6 wff ( -. y e. x /\ ( z e. x -> ( ( v e. z /\ v e. y ) /\ ( ( u e. z /\ u e. y ) -> u = v ) ) ) )
29	14, 28	wo 370	. . . . 5 wff ( ( y e. x /\ ( z e. y -> ( ( v e. x /\ -. y = v ) /\ z e. v ) ) ) \/ ( -. y e. x /\ ( z e. x -> ( ( v e. z /\ v e. y ) /\ ( ( u e. z /\ u e. y ) -> u = v ) ) ) ) )
30	29, 20	wal 1442	. . . 4 wff A. u ( ( y e. x /\ ( z e. y -> ( ( v e. x /\ -. y = v ) /\ z e. v ) ) ) \/ ( -. y e. x /\ ( z e. x -> ( ( v e. z /\ v e. y ) /\ ( ( u e. z /\ u e. y ) -> u = v ) ) ) ) )
31	30, 6	wex 1663	. . 3 wff E. v A. u ( ( y e. x /\ ( z e. y -> ( ( v e. x /\ -. y = v ) /\ z e. v ) ) ) \/ ( -. y e. x /\ ( z e. x -> ( ( v e. z /\ v e. y ) /\ ( ( u e. z /\ u e. y ) -> u = v ) ) ) ) )
32	31, 4	wal 1442	. 2 wff A. z E. v A. u ( ( y e. x /\ ( z e. y -> ( ( v e. x /\ -. y = v ) /\ z e. v ) ) ) \/ ( -. y e. x /\ ( z e. x -> ( ( v e. z /\ v e. y ) /\ ( ( u e. z /\ u e. y ) -> u = v ) ) ) ) )
33	32, 1	wex 1663	1 wff E. y A. z E. v A. u ( ( y e. x /\ ( z e. y -> ( ( v e. x /\ -. y = v ) /\ z e. v ) ) ) \/ ( -. y e. x /\ ( z e. x -> ( ( v e. z /\ v e. y ) /\ ( ( u e. z /\ u e. y ) -> u = v ) ) ) ) )

This axiom is referenced by:  axac3  8894