Axiom ax-ac2 8631

Description: In order to avoid uses of ax-reg 7806 for derivation of AC equivalents, we provide ax-ac2 8631, which is equivalent to the standard AC of textbooks. This appears to be the shortest known equivalent to the standard AC when expressed in terms of set theory primitives. It was found by Kurt Maes as theorem ackm 8633. We removed the leading quantifier to make it slightly shorter, since we have ax-gen 1591 available. The derivation of ax-ac2 8631 from ax-ac 8627 is shown by theorem axac2 8634, and the reverse derivation by axac 8635. Note that we use ax-reg 7806 to derive ax-ac 8627 from ax-ac2 8631, but not to derive ax-ac2 8631 from ax-ac 8627. (Contributed by NM, 19-Dec-2016.)

Assertion

Ref	Expression
ax-ac2	|- E. y A. z E. v A. u ( ( y e. x /\ ( z e. y -> ( ( v e. x /\ -. y = v ) /\ z e. v ) ) ) \/ ( -. y e. x /\ ( z e. x -> ( ( v e. z /\ v e. y ) /\ ( ( u e. z /\ u e. y ) -> u = v ) ) ) ) )

Distinct variable group:   x, y, z, v, u

Detailed syntax breakdown of Axiom ax-ac2

Step	Hyp	Ref	Expression
1		vy	. . . . . . . 8 setvar y
2		vx	. . . . . . . 8 setvar x
3	1, 2	wel 1757	. . . . . . 7 wff y e. x
4		vz	. . . . . . . . 9 setvar z
5	4, 1	wel 1757	. . . . . . . 8 wff z e. y
6		vv	. . . . . . . . . . 11 setvar v
7	6, 2	wel 1757	. . . . . . . . . 10 wff v e. x
8	1, 6	weq 1695	. . . . . . . . . . 11 wff y = v
9	8	wn 3	. . . . . . . . . 10 wff -. y = v
10	7, 9	wa 369	. . . . . . . . 9 wff ( v e. x /\ -. y = v )
11	4, 6	wel 1757	. . . . . . . . 9 wff z e. v
12	10, 11	wa 369	. . . . . . . 8 wff ( ( v e. x /\ -. y = v ) /\ z e. v )
13	5, 12	wi 4	. . . . . . 7 wff ( z e. y -> ( ( v e. x /\ -. y = v ) /\ z e. v ) )
14	3, 13	wa 369	. . . . . 6 wff ( y e. x /\ ( z e. y -> ( ( v e. x /\ -. y = v ) /\ z e. v ) ) )
15	3	wn 3	. . . . . . 7 wff -. y e. x
16	4, 2	wel 1757	. . . . . . . 8 wff z e. x
17	6, 4	wel 1757	. . . . . . . . . 10 wff v e. z
18	6, 1	wel 1757	. . . . . . . . . 10 wff v e. y
19	17, 18	wa 369	. . . . . . . . 9 wff ( v e. z /\ v e. y )
20		vu	. . . . . . . . . . . 12 setvar u
21	20, 4	wel 1757	. . . . . . . . . . 11 wff u e. z
22	20, 1	wel 1757	. . . . . . . . . . 11 wff u e. y
23	21, 22	wa 369	. . . . . . . . . 10 wff ( u e. z /\ u e. y )
24	20, 6	weq 1695	. . . . . . . . . 10 wff u = v
25	23, 24	wi 4	. . . . . . . . 9 wff ( ( u e. z /\ u e. y ) -> u = v )
26	19, 25	wa 369	. . . . . . . 8 wff ( ( v e. z /\ v e. y ) /\ ( ( u e. z /\ u e. y ) -> u = v ) )
27	16, 26	wi 4	. . . . . . 7 wff ( z e. x -> ( ( v e. z /\ v e. y ) /\ ( ( u e. z /\ u e. y ) -> u = v ) ) )
28	15, 27	wa 369	. . . . . 6 wff ( -. y e. x /\ ( z e. x -> ( ( v e. z /\ v e. y ) /\ ( ( u e. z /\ u e. y ) -> u = v ) ) ) )
29	14, 28	wo 368	. . . . 5 wff ( ( y e. x /\ ( z e. y -> ( ( v e. x /\ -. y = v ) /\ z e. v ) ) ) \/ ( -. y e. x /\ ( z e. x -> ( ( v e. z /\ v e. y ) /\ ( ( u e. z /\ u e. y ) -> u = v ) ) ) ) )
30	29, 20	wal 1367	. . . 4 wff A. u ( ( y e. x /\ ( z e. y -> ( ( v e. x /\ -. y = v ) /\ z e. v ) ) ) \/ ( -. y e. x /\ ( z e. x -> ( ( v e. z /\ v e. y ) /\ ( ( u e. z /\ u e. y ) -> u = v ) ) ) ) )
31	30, 6	wex 1586	. . 3 wff E. v A. u ( ( y e. x /\ ( z e. y -> ( ( v e. x /\ -. y = v ) /\ z e. v ) ) ) \/ ( -. y e. x /\ ( z e. x -> ( ( v e. z /\ v e. y ) /\ ( ( u e. z /\ u e. y ) -> u = v ) ) ) ) )
32	31, 4	wal 1367	. 2 wff A. z E. v A. u ( ( y e. x /\ ( z e. y -> ( ( v e. x /\ -. y = v ) /\ z e. v ) ) ) \/ ( -. y e. x /\ ( z e. x -> ( ( v e. z /\ v e. y ) /\ ( ( u e. z /\ u e. y ) -> u = v ) ) ) ) )
33	32, 1	wex 1586	1 wff E. y A. z E. v A. u ( ( y e. x /\ ( z e. y -> ( ( v e. x /\ -. y = v ) /\ z e. v ) ) ) \/ ( -. y e. x /\ ( z e. x -> ( ( v e. z /\ v e. y ) /\ ( ( u e. z /\ u e. y ) -> u = v ) ) ) ) )

This axiom is referenced by:  axac3  8632