| Metamath Proof Explorer |
< Previous
Next >
Related theorems Unicode version |
| Description: Existential introduction, using implicit substitition. Compare Lemma 14 of [Tarski] p. 70. |
| Ref | Expression |
|---|---|
| a4ime.1 |
|
| a4ime.2 |
|
| Ref | Expression |
|---|---|
| a4ime |
|
| Step | Hyp | Ref | Expression |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | a4ime.1 |
. . . . 5
| |
| 2 | 1 | hbn 1045 |
. . . 4
|
| 3 | a4ime.2 |
. . . . 5
| |
| 4 | 3 | con3d 99 |
. . . 4
|
| 5 | 2, 4 | a4im 1201 |
. . 3
|
| 6 | 5 | con2i 102 |
. 2
|
| 7 | df-ex 1022 |
. 2
| |
| 8 | 6, 7 | sylibr 207 |
1
|
| Colors of variables: wff set class |
| Syntax hints: |
| This theorem is referenced by: a4imed 1203 a4imev 1315 fine 10533 |
| This theorem was proved from axioms: ax-1 4 ax-2 5 ax-3 6 ax-mp 7 ax-gen 1004 ax-4 1014 ax-5o 1016 ax-6o 1019 ax-9o 1164 |
| This theorem depends on definitions: df-bi 154 df-ex 1022 |