HomeHome Metamath Proof Explorer < Previous   Next >
Related theorems
Unicode version

Theorem a12stdy2 1415
Description: Part of a study related to ax-12 1009. The consequent is quantified with a different variable. There are no distinct variable restrictions.
Assertion
Ref Expression
a12stdy2 |- (A.z(z = x /\ x = y) -> A.y y = x)

Proof of Theorem a12stdy2
StepHypRef Expression
1 19.26 1108 . 2 |- (A.z(z = x /\ x = y) <-> (A.z z = x /\ A.z x = y))
2 ax-10o 1182 . . . 4 |- (A.z z = x -> (A.z x = y -> A.x x = y))
3 alequcom 1184 . . . 4 |- (A.x x = y -> A.y y = x)
42, 3syl6 22 . . 3 |- (A.z z = x -> (A.z x = y -> A.y y = x))
54imp 357 . 2 |- ((A.z z = x /\ A.z x = y) -> A.y y = x)
61, 5sylbi 206 1 |- (A.z(z = x /\ x = y) -> A.y y = x)
Colors of variables: wff set class
Syntax hints:   -> wi 3   /\ wa 230  A.wal 995   = wceq 997
This theorem is referenced by:  a12stdy3 1416
This theorem was proved from axioms:  ax-1 4  ax-2 5  ax-3 6  ax-mp 7  ax-gen 1004  ax-10 1007  ax-4 1014  ax-5o 1016  ax-10o 1182
This theorem depends on definitions:  df-bi 154  df-an 232
Copyright terms: Public domain