HomeHome Metamath Proof Explorer < Previous   Next >
Related theorems
Unicode version

Theorem 2dom 5486
Description: A set that dominates ordinal 2 has at least 2 different members.
Hypothesis
Ref Expression
2dom.1 |- A e. _V
Assertion
Ref Expression
2dom |- (2o ~<_ A -> E.x e. A E.y e. A -. x = y)
Distinct variable group:   x,y,A

Proof of Theorem 2dom
StepHypRef Expression
1 df2o2 5186 . . . 4 |- 2o = {(/), {(/)}}
21breq1i 3345 . . 3 |- (2o ~<_ A <-> {(/), {(/)}} ~<_ A)
3 2dom.1 . . . 4 |- A e. _V
43brdom 5437 . . 3 |- ({(/), {(/)}} ~<_ A <-> E.f f:{(/), {(/)}}-1-1->A)
52, 4bitri 190 . 2 |- (2o ~<_ A <-> E.f f:{(/), {(/)}}-1-1->A)
6 ffvelrn 4787 . . . . 5 |- ((f:{(/), {(/)}}-->A /\ (/) e. {(/), {(/)}}) -> (f` (/)) e. A)
7 f1f 4610 . . . . 5 |- (f:{(/), {(/)}}-1-1->A -> f:{(/), {(/)}}-->A)
8 0ex 3446 . . . . . 6 |- (/) e. _V
98prid1 3106 . . . . 5 |- (/) e. {(/), {(/)}}
106, 7, 9sylancl 525 . . . 4 |- (f:{(/), {(/)}}-1-1->A -> (f` (/)) e. A)
11 ffvelrn 4787 . . . . 5 |- ((f:{(/), {(/)}}-->A /\ {(/)} e. {(/), {(/)}}) -> (f` {(/)}) e. A)
12 p0ex 3495 . . . . . 6 |- {(/)} e. _V
1312prid2 3107 . . . . 5 |- {(/)} e. {(/), {(/)}}
1411, 7, 13sylancl 525 . . . 4 |- (f:{(/), {(/)}}-1-1->A -> (f` {(/)}) e. A)
15 0nep0 3474 . . . . . 6 |- (/) =/= {(/)}
16 df-ne 2019 . . . . . 6 |- ((/) =/= {(/)} <-> -. (/) = {(/)})
1715, 16mpbi 206 . . . . 5 |- -. (/) = {(/)}
18 f1fveq 4852 . . . . . 6 |- ((f:{(/), {(/)}}-1-1->A /\ ((/) e. {(/), {(/)}} /\ {(/)} e. {(/), {(/)}})) -> ((f` (/)) = (f` {(/)}) <-> (/) = {(/)}))
199, 13, 18mpanr12 778 . . . . 5 |- (f:{(/), {(/)}}-1-1->A -> ((f` (/)) = (f` {(/)}) <-> (/) = {(/)}))
2017, 19mtbiri 785 . . . 4 |- (f:{(/), {(/)}}-1-1->A -> -. (f` (/)) = (f` {(/)}))
21 eqeq1 1890 . . . . . 6 |- (x = (f` (/)) -> (x = y <-> (f` (/)) = y))
2221notbid 673 . . . . 5 |- (x = (f` (/)) -> (-. x = y <-> -. (f` (/)) = y))
23 eqeq2 1893 . . . . . 6 |- (y = (f` {(/)}) -> ((f` (/)) = y <-> (f` (/)) = (f` {(/)})))
2423notbid 673 . . . . 5 |- (y = (f` {(/)}) -> (-. (f` (/)) = y <-> -. (f` (/)) = (f` {(/)})))
2522, 24rcla42ev 2385 . . . 4 |- (((f` (/)) e. A /\ (f` {(/)}) e. A /\ -. (f` (/)) = (f` {(/)})) -> E.x e. A E.y e. A -. x = y)
2610, 14, 20, 25syl111anc 1100 . . 3 |- (f:{(/), {(/)}}-1-1->A -> E.x e. A E.y e. A -. x = y)
272619.23aiv 1674 . 2 |- (E.f f:{(/), {(/)}}-1-1->A -> E.x e. A E.y e. A -. x = y)
285, 27sylbi 216 1 |- (2o ~<_ A -> E.x e. A E.y e. A -. x = y)
Colors of variables: wff set class
Syntax hints:  -. wn 2   -> wi 3   <-> wb 163   = wceq 1298   e. wcel 1300  E.wex 1326   =/= wne 2017  E.wrex 2106  _Vcvv 2292  (/)c0 2875  {csn 3044  {cpr 3045   class class class wbr 3338  -->wf 3994  -1-1->wf1 3995  ` cfv 3998  2oc2o 5173   ~<_ cdom 5424
This theorem is referenced by:  unxpdomlem 5995
This theorem was proved from axioms:  ax-1 4  ax-2 5  ax-3 6  ax-mp 7  ax-7 1304  ax-gen 1305  ax-8 1306  ax-9 1307  ax-10 1308  ax-11 1309  ax-12 1310  ax-13 1311  ax-14 1312  ax-17 1317  ax-4 1319  ax-5o 1321  ax-6o 1324  ax-9o 1481  ax-10o 1500  ax-16 1580  ax-11o 1588  ax-ext 1865  ax-sep 3438  ax-nul 3445  ax-pow 3481  ax-pr 3524  ax-un 3790
This theorem depends on definitions:  df-bi 164  df-or 241  df-an 242  df-3an 860  df-ex 1327  df-sb 1536  df-eu 1775  df-mo 1776  df-clab 1872  df-cleq 1877  df-clel 1880  df-ne 2019  df-ral 2109  df-rex 2110  df-v 2294  df-dif 2597  df-un 2600  df-in 2603  df-ss 2605  df-nul 2876  df-pw 3035  df-sn 3049  df-pr 3050  df-op 3053  df-uni 3178  df-br 3339  df-opab 3396  df-id 3586  df-suc 3663  df-xp 4000  df-rel 4001  df-cnv 4002  df-co 4003  df-dm 4004  df-rn 4005  df-res 4006  df-ima 4007  df-fun 4008  df-fn 4009  df-f 4010  df-f1 4011  df-fv 4014  df-1o 5177  df-2o 5178  df-dom 5428
Copyright terms: Public domain