Theorem xordc 1283

Description: Two ways to express "exclusive or" between decidable propositions. Theorem *5.22 of [WhiteheadRussell] p. 124, but for decidable propositions. (Contributed by Jim Kingdon, 5-May-2018.)

Assertion

Ref	Expression
xordc	⊢ (DECID 𝜑 → (DECID 𝜓 → (¬ (𝜑 ↔ 𝜓) ↔ ((𝜑 ∧ ¬ 𝜓) ∨ (𝜓 ∧ ¬ 𝜑)))))

Proof of Theorem xordc

Step	Hyp	Ref	Expression
1		excxor 1269	. . . 4 ⊢ ((𝜑 ⊻ 𝜓) ↔ ((𝜑 ∧ ¬ 𝜓) ∨ (¬ 𝜑 ∧ 𝜓)))
2		ancom 253	. . . . 5 ⊢ ((¬ 𝜑 ∧ 𝜓) ↔ (𝜓 ∧ ¬ 𝜑))
3	2	orbi2i 679	. . . 4 ⊢ (((𝜑 ∧ ¬ 𝜓) ∨ (¬ 𝜑 ∧ 𝜓)) ↔ ((𝜑 ∧ ¬ 𝜓) ∨ (𝜓 ∧ ¬ 𝜑)))
4	1, 3	bitri 173	. . 3 ⊢ ((𝜑 ⊻ 𝜓) ↔ ((𝜑 ∧ ¬ 𝜓) ∨ (𝜓 ∧ ¬ 𝜑)))
5		xornbidc 1282	. . . 4 ⊢ (DECID 𝜑 → (DECID 𝜓 → ((𝜑 ⊻ 𝜓) ↔ ¬ (𝜑 ↔ 𝜓))))
6	5	imp 115	. . 3 ⊢ ((DECID 𝜑 ∧ DECID 𝜓) → ((𝜑 ⊻ 𝜓) ↔ ¬ (𝜑 ↔ 𝜓)))
7	4, 6	syl5rbbr 184	. 2 ⊢ ((DECID 𝜑 ∧ DECID 𝜓) → (¬ (𝜑 ↔ 𝜓) ↔ ((𝜑 ∧ ¬ 𝜓) ∨ (𝜓 ∧ ¬ 𝜑))))
8	7	ex 108	1 ⊢ (DECID 𝜑 → (DECID 𝜓 → (¬ (𝜑 ↔ 𝜓) ↔ ((𝜑 ∧ ¬ 𝜓) ∨ (𝜓 ∧ ¬ 𝜑)))))

Syntax hints:  ¬ wn 3   → wi 4   ∧ wa 97   ↔ wb 98   ∨ wo 629  DECID wdc 742   ⊻ wxo 1266

This theorem was proved from axioms:  ax-1 5  ax-2 6  ax-mp 7  ax-ia1 99  ax-ia2 100  ax-ia3 101  ax-in1 544  ax-in2 545  ax-io 630

This theorem depends on definitions:  df-bi 110  df-dc 743  df-xor 1267

This theorem is referenced by:  dfbi3dc  1288  pm5.24dc  1289