Theorem 3ori 1195

Description: Infer implication from triple disjunction. (Contributed by NM, 26-Sep-2006.)

Hypothesis

Ref	Expression
3ori.1	⊢ (𝜑 ∨ 𝜓 ∨ 𝜒)

Assertion

Ref	Expression
3ori	⊢ ((¬ 𝜑 ∧ ¬ 𝜓) → 𝜒)

Proof of Theorem 3ori

Step	Hyp	Ref	Expression
1		ioran 669	. 2 ⊢ (¬ (𝜑 ∨ 𝜓) ↔ (¬ 𝜑 ∧ ¬ 𝜓))
2		3ori.1	. . . 4 ⊢ (𝜑 ∨ 𝜓 ∨ 𝜒)
3		df-3or 886	. . . 4 ⊢ ((𝜑 ∨ 𝜓 ∨ 𝜒) ↔ ((𝜑 ∨ 𝜓) ∨ 𝜒))
4	2, 3	mpbi 133	. . 3 ⊢ ((𝜑 ∨ 𝜓) ∨ 𝜒)
5	4	ori 642	. 2 ⊢ (¬ (𝜑 ∨ 𝜓) → 𝜒)
6	1, 5	sylbir 125	1 ⊢ ((¬ 𝜑 ∧ ¬ 𝜓) → 𝜒)

Syntax hints:  ¬ wn 3   → wi 4   ∧ wa 97   ∨ wo 629   ∨ w3o 884

This theorem was proved from axioms:  ax-1 5  ax-2 6  ax-mp 7  ax-ia1 99  ax-ia2 100  ax-ia3 101  ax-in1 544  ax-in2 545  ax-io 630

This theorem depends on definitions:  df-bi 110  df-3or 886

This theorem is referenced by: (None)