Theorem spime 1629

Description: Existential introduction, using implicit substitution. Compare Lemma 14 of [Tarski] p. 70. (Contributed by NM, 7-Aug-1994.) (Revised by Mario Carneiro, 3-Oct-2016.) (Proof shortened by Wolf Lammen, 6-Mar-2018.)

Hypotheses

Ref	Expression
spime.1	|- F/ x ph
spime.2	|- ( x = y -> ( ph -> ps ) )

Assertion

Ref	Expression
spime	|- ( ph -> E. x ps )

Proof of Theorem spime

Step	Hyp	Ref	Expression
1		spime.1	. . . 4 |- F/ x ph
2	1	a1i 9	. . 3 |- ( T. -> F/ x ph )
3		spime.2	. . 3 |- ( x = y -> ( ph -> ps ) )
4	2, 3	spimed 1628	. 2 |- ( T. -> ( ph -> E. x ps ) )
5	4	trud 1252	1 |- ( ph -> E. x ps )

Syntax hints:   -> wi 4   T. wtru 1244   F/wnf 1349   E.wex 1381

This theorem was proved from axioms:  ax-1 5  ax-2 6  ax-mp 7  ax-ia1 99  ax-ia2 100  ax-ia3 101  ax-5 1336  ax-gen 1338  ax-ie1 1382  ax-ie2 1383  ax-4 1400  ax-i9 1423  ax-ial 1427

This theorem depends on definitions:  df-bi 110  df-tru 1246  df-nf 1350

This theorem is referenced by:  spimev  1741