Theorem moanim 1974

Description: Introduction of a conjunct into "at most one" quantifier. (Contributed by NM, 3-Dec-2001.)

Hypothesis

Ref	Expression
moanim.1	|- F/ x ph

Assertion

Ref	Expression
moanim	|- ( E* x ( ph /\ ps ) <-> ( ph -> E* x ps ) )

Proof of Theorem moanim

Dummy variable y is distinct from all other variables.

Step	Hyp	Ref	Expression
1		anandi 524	. . . . 5 |- ( ( ph /\ ( ps /\ [ y / x ] ps ) ) <-> ( ( ph /\ ps ) /\ ( ph /\ [ y / x ] ps ) ) )
2	1	imbi1i 227	. . . 4 |- ( ( ( ph /\ ( ps /\ [ y / x ] ps ) ) -> x = y ) <-> ( ( ( ph /\ ps ) /\ ( ph /\ [ y / x ] ps ) ) -> x = y ) )
3		impexp 250	. . . 4 |- ( ( ( ph /\ ( ps /\ [ y / x ] ps ) ) -> x = y ) <-> ( ph -> ( ( ps /\ [ y / x ] ps ) -> x = y ) ) )
4		sban 1829	. . . . . . 7 |- ( [ y / x ] ( ph /\ ps ) <-> ( [ y / x ] ph /\ [ y / x ] ps ) )
5		moanim.1	. . . . . . . . 9 |- F/ x ph
6	5	sbf 1660	. . . . . . . 8 |- ( [ y / x ] ph <-> ph )
7	6	anbi1i 431	. . . . . . 7 |- ( ( [ y / x ] ph /\ [ y / x ] ps ) <-> ( ph /\ [ y / x ] ps ) )
8	4, 7	bitr2i 174	. . . . . 6 |- ( ( ph /\ [ y / x ] ps ) <-> [ y / x ] ( ph /\ ps ) )
9	8	anbi2i 430	. . . . 5 |- ( ( ( ph /\ ps ) /\ ( ph /\ [ y / x ] ps ) ) <-> ( ( ph /\ ps ) /\ [ y / x ] ( ph /\ ps ) ) )
10	9	imbi1i 227	. . . 4 |- ( ( ( ( ph /\ ps ) /\ ( ph /\ [ y / x ] ps ) ) -> x = y ) <-> ( ( ( ph /\ ps ) /\ [ y / x ] ( ph /\ ps ) ) -> x = y ) )
11	2, 3, 10	3bitr3i 199	. . 3 |- ( ( ph -> ( ( ps /\ [ y / x ] ps ) -> x = y ) ) <-> ( ( ( ph /\ ps ) /\ [ y / x ] ( ph /\ ps ) ) -> x = y ) )
12	11	2albii 1360	. 2 |- ( A. x A. y ( ph -> ( ( ps /\ [ y / x ] ps ) -> x = y ) ) <-> A. x A. y ( ( ( ph /\ ps ) /\ [ y / x ] ( ph /\ ps ) ) -> x = y ) )
13	5	19.21 1475	. . 3 |- ( A. x ( ph -> A. y ( ( ps /\ [ y / x ] ps ) -> x = y ) ) <-> ( ph -> A. x A. y ( ( ps /\ [ y / x ] ps ) -> x = y ) ) )
14		19.21v 1753	. . . 4 |- ( A. y ( ph -> ( ( ps /\ [ y / x ] ps ) -> x = y ) ) <-> ( ph -> A. y ( ( ps /\ [ y / x ] ps ) -> x = y ) ) )
15	14	albii 1359	. . 3 |- ( A. x A. y ( ph -> ( ( ps /\ [ y / x ] ps ) -> x = y ) ) <-> A. x ( ph -> A. y ( ( ps /\ [ y / x ] ps ) -> x = y ) ) )
16		ax-17 1419	. . . . 5 |- ( ps -> A. y ps )
17	16	mo3h 1953	. . . 4 |- ( E* x ps <-> A. x A. y ( ( ps /\ [ y / x ] ps ) -> x = y ) )
18	17	imbi2i 215	. . 3 |- ( ( ph -> E* x ps ) <-> ( ph -> A. x A. y ( ( ps /\ [ y / x ] ps ) -> x = y ) ) )
19	13, 15, 18	3bitr4ri 202	. 2 |- ( ( ph -> E* x ps ) <-> A. x A. y ( ph -> ( ( ps /\ [ y / x ] ps ) -> x = y ) ) )
20		ax-17 1419	. . 3 |- ( ( ph /\ ps ) -> A. y ( ph /\ ps ) )
21	20	mo3h 1953	. 2 |- ( E* x ( ph /\ ps ) <-> A. x A. y ( ( ( ph /\ ps ) /\ [ y / x ] ( ph /\ ps ) ) -> x = y ) )
22	12, 19, 21	3bitr4ri 202	1 |- ( E* x ( ph /\ ps ) <-> ( ph -> E* x ps ) )

Syntax hints:   -> wi 4   /\ wa 97   <-> wb 98   A.wal 1241   F/wnf 1349   [wsb 1645   E*wmo 1901

This theorem was proved from axioms:  ax-1 5  ax-2 6  ax-mp 7  ax-ia1 99  ax-ia2 100  ax-ia3 101  ax-io 630  ax-5 1336  ax-7 1337  ax-gen 1338  ax-ie1 1382  ax-ie2 1383  ax-8 1395  ax-10 1396  ax-11 1397  ax-i12 1398  ax-bndl 1399  ax-4 1400  ax-17 1419  ax-i9 1423  ax-ial 1427  ax-i5r 1428

This theorem depends on definitions:  df-bi 110  df-nf 1350  df-sb 1646  df-eu 1903  df-mo 1904

This theorem is referenced by:  moanimv  1975  moaneu  1976  moanmo  1977