P. 63 of Theorem List - Intuitionistic Logic Explorer

Theorem List for Intuitionistic Logic Explorer - 6201-6300   *Has distinct variable group(s)

Type	Label	Description
Statement
Theorem	ecopoveq 6201*	This is the first of several theorems about equivalence relations of the kind used in construction of fractions and signed reals, involving operations on equivalent classes of ordered pairs. This theorem expresses the relation .~ (specified by the hypothesis) in terms of its operation F. (Contributed by NM, 16-Aug-1995.)
|- .~ = { <. x , y >. | ( ( x e. ( S X. S ) /\ y e. ( S X. S ) ) /\ E. z E. w E. v E. u ( ( x = <. z , w >. /\ y = <. v , u >. ) /\ ( z .+ u ) = ( w .+ v ) ) ) }   =>    |- ( ( ( A e. S /\ B e. S ) /\ ( C e. S /\ D e. S ) ) -> ( <. A , B >. .~ <. C , D >. <-> ( A .+ D ) = ( B .+ C ) ) )
Theorem	ecopovsym 6202*	Assuming the operation F is commutative, show that the relation .~, specified by the first hypothesis, is symmetric. (Contributed by NM, 27-Aug-1995.) (Revised by Mario Carneiro, 26-Apr-2015.)
|- .~ = { <. x , y >. | ( ( x e. ( S X. S ) /\ y e. ( S X. S ) ) /\ E. z E. w E. v E. u ( ( x = <. z , w >. /\ y = <. v , u >. ) /\ ( z .+ u ) = ( w .+ v ) ) ) }   &    |- ( x .+ y ) = ( y .+ x )   =>    |- ( A .~ B -> B .~ A )
Theorem	ecopovtrn 6203*	Assuming that operation F is commutative (second hypothesis), closed (third hypothesis), associative (fourth hypothesis), and has the cancellation property (fifth hypothesis), show that the relation .~, specified by the first hypothesis, is transitive. (Contributed by NM, 11-Feb-1996.) (Revised by Mario Carneiro, 26-Apr-2015.)
|- .~ = { <. x , y >. | ( ( x e. ( S X. S ) /\ y e. ( S X. S ) ) /\ E. z E. w E. v E. u ( ( x = <. z , w >. /\ y = <. v , u >. ) /\ ( z .+ u ) = ( w .+ v ) ) ) }   &    |- ( x .+ y ) = ( y .+ x )   &    |- ( ( x e. S /\ y e. S ) -> ( x .+ y ) e. S )   &    |- ( ( x .+ y ) .+ z ) = ( x .+ ( y .+ z ) )   &    |- ( ( x e. S /\ y e. S ) -> ( ( x .+ y ) = ( x .+ z ) -> y = z ) )   =>    |- ( ( A .~ B /\ B .~ C ) -> A .~ C )
Theorem	ecopover 6204*	Assuming that operation F is commutative (second hypothesis), closed (third hypothesis), associative (fourth hypothesis), and has the cancellation property (fifth hypothesis), show that the relation .~, specified by the first hypothesis, is an equivalence relation. (Contributed by NM, 16-Feb-1996.) (Revised by Mario Carneiro, 12-Aug-2015.)
|- .~ = { <. x , y >. | ( ( x e. ( S X. S ) /\ y e. ( S X. S ) ) /\ E. z E. w E. v E. u ( ( x = <. z , w >. /\ y = <. v , u >. ) /\ ( z .+ u ) = ( w .+ v ) ) ) }   &    |- ( x .+ y ) = ( y .+ x )   &    |- ( ( x e. S /\ y e. S ) -> ( x .+ y ) e. S )   &    |- ( ( x .+ y ) .+ z ) = ( x .+ ( y .+ z ) )   &    |- ( ( x e. S /\ y e. S ) -> ( ( x .+ y ) = ( x .+ z ) -> y = z ) )   =>    |- .~ Er ( S X. S )
Theorem	ecopovsymg 6205*	Assuming the operation F is commutative, show that the relation .~, specified by the first hypothesis, is symmetric. (Contributed by Jim Kingdon, 1-Sep-2019.)
|- .~ = { <. x , y >. | ( ( x e. ( S X. S ) /\ y e. ( S X. S ) ) /\ E. z E. w E. v E. u ( ( x = <. z , w >. /\ y = <. v , u >. ) /\ ( z .+ u ) = ( w .+ v ) ) ) }   &    |- ( ( x e. S /\ y e. S ) -> ( x .+ y ) = ( y .+ x ) )   =>    |- ( A .~ B -> B .~ A )
Theorem	ecopovtrng 6206*	Assuming that operation F is commutative (second hypothesis), closed (third hypothesis), associative (fourth hypothesis), and has the cancellation property (fifth hypothesis), show that the relation .~, specified by the first hypothesis, is transitive. (Contributed by Jim Kingdon, 1-Sep-2019.)
|- .~ = { <. x , y >. | ( ( x e. ( S X. S ) /\ y e. ( S X. S ) ) /\ E. z E. w E. v E. u ( ( x = <. z , w >. /\ y = <. v , u >. ) /\ ( z .+ u ) = ( w .+ v ) ) ) }   &    |- ( ( x e. S /\ y e. S ) -> ( x .+ y ) = ( y .+ x ) )   &    |- ( ( x e. S /\ y e. S ) -> ( x .+ y ) e. S )   &    |- ( ( x e. S /\ y e. S /\ z e. S ) -> ( ( x .+ y ) .+ z ) = ( x .+ ( y .+ z ) ) )   &    |- ( ( x e. S /\ y e. S /\ z e. S ) -> ( ( x .+ y ) = ( x .+ z ) -> y = z ) )   =>    |- ( ( A .~ B /\ B .~ C ) -> A .~ C )
Theorem	ecopoverg 6207*	Assuming that operation F is commutative (second hypothesis), closed (third hypothesis), associative (fourth hypothesis), and has the cancellation property (fifth hypothesis), show that the relation .~, specified by the first hypothesis, is an equivalence relation. (Contributed by Jim Kingdon, 1-Sep-2019.)
|- .~ = { <. x , y >. | ( ( x e. ( S X. S ) /\ y e. ( S X. S ) ) /\ E. z E. w E. v E. u ( ( x = <. z , w >. /\ y = <. v , u >. ) /\ ( z .+ u ) = ( w .+ v ) ) ) }   &    |- ( ( x e. S /\ y e. S ) -> ( x .+ y ) = ( y .+ x ) )   &    |- ( ( x e. S /\ y e. S ) -> ( x .+ y ) e. S )   &    |- ( ( x e. S /\ y e. S /\ z e. S ) -> ( ( x .+ y ) .+ z ) = ( x .+ ( y .+ z ) ) )   &    |- ( ( x e. S /\ y e. S /\ z e. S ) -> ( ( x .+ y ) = ( x .+ z ) -> y = z ) )   =>    |- .~ Er ( S X. S )
Theorem	th3qlem1 6208*	Lemma for Exercise 44 version of Theorem 3Q of [Enderton] p. 60. The third hypothesis is the compatibility assumption. (Contributed by NM, 3-Aug-1995.) (Revised by Mario Carneiro, 9-Jul-2014.)
|- .~ Er S   &    |- ( ( ( y e. S /\ w e. S ) /\ ( z e. S /\ v e. S ) ) -> ( ( y .~ w /\ z .~ v ) -> ( y .+ z ) .~ ( w .+ v ) ) )   =>    |- ( ( A e. ( S /. .~ ) /\ B e. ( S /. .~ ) ) -> E* x E. y E. z ( ( A = [ y ] .~ /\ B = [ z ] .~ ) /\ x = [ ( y .+ z ) ] .~ ) )
Theorem	th3qlem2 6209*	Lemma for Exercise 44 version of Theorem 3Q of [Enderton] p. 60, extended to operations on ordered pairs. The fourth hypothesis is the compatibility assumption. (Contributed by NM, 4-Aug-1995.) (Revised by Mario Carneiro, 12-Aug-2015.)
|- .~ e. _V   &    |- .~ Er ( S X. S )   &    |- ( ( ( ( w e. S /\ v e. S ) /\ ( u e. S /\ t e. S ) ) /\ ( ( s e. S /\ f e. S ) /\ ( g e. S /\ h e. S ) ) ) -> ( ( <. w , v >. .~ <. u , t >. /\ <. s , f >. .~ <. g , h >. ) -> ( <. w , v >. .+ <. s , f >. ) .~ ( <. u , t >. .+ <. g , h >. ) ) )   =>    |- ( ( A e. ( ( S X. S ) /. .~ ) /\ B e. ( ( S X. S ) /. .~ ) ) -> E* z E. w E. v E. u E. t ( ( A = [ <. w , v >. ] .~ /\ B = [ <. u , t >. ] .~ ) /\ z = [ ( <. w , v >. .+ <. u , t >. ) ] .~ ) )
Theorem	th3qcor 6210*	Corollary of Theorem 3Q of [Enderton] p. 60. (Contributed by NM, 12-Nov-1995.) (Revised by David Abernethy, 4-Jun-2013.)
|- .~ e. _V   &    |- .~ Er ( S X. S )   &    |- ( ( ( ( w e. S /\ v e. S ) /\ ( u e. S /\ t e. S ) ) /\ ( ( s e. S /\ f e. S ) /\ ( g e. S /\ h e. S ) ) ) -> ( ( <. w , v >. .~ <. u , t >. /\ <. s , f >. .~ <. g , h >. ) -> ( <. w , v >. .+ <. s , f >. ) .~ ( <. u , t >. .+ <. g , h >. ) ) )   &    |- G = { <. <. x , y >. , z >. | ( ( x e. ( ( S X. S ) /. .~ ) /\ y e. ( ( S X. S ) /. .~ ) ) /\ E. w E. v E. u E. t ( ( x = [ <. w , v >. ] .~ /\ y = [ <. u , t >. ] .~ ) /\ z = [ ( <. w , v >. .+ <. u , t >. ) ] .~ ) ) }   =>    |- Fun G
Theorem	th3q 6211*	Theorem 3Q of [Enderton] p. 60, extended to operations on ordered pairs. (Contributed by NM, 4-Aug-1995.) (Revised by Mario Carneiro, 19-Dec-2013.)
|- .~ e. _V   &    |- .~ Er ( S X. S )   &    |- ( ( ( ( w e. S /\ v e. S ) /\ ( u e. S /\ t e. S ) ) /\ ( ( s e. S /\ f e. S ) /\ ( g e. S /\ h e. S ) ) ) -> ( ( <. w , v >. .~ <. u , t >. /\ <. s , f >. .~ <. g , h >. ) -> ( <. w , v >. .+ <. s , f >. ) .~ ( <. u , t >. .+ <. g , h >. ) ) )   &    |- G = { <. <. x , y >. , z >. | ( ( x e. ( ( S X. S ) /. .~ ) /\ y e. ( ( S X. S ) /. .~ ) ) /\ E. w E. v E. u E. t ( ( x = [ <. w , v >. ] .~ /\ y = [ <. u , t >. ] .~ ) /\ z = [ ( <. w , v >. .+ <. u , t >. ) ] .~ ) ) }   =>    |- ( ( ( A e. S /\ B e. S ) /\ ( C e. S /\ D e. S ) ) -> ( [ <. A , B >. ] .~ G [ <. C , D >. ] .~ ) = [ ( <. A , B >. .+ <. C , D >. ) ] .~ )
Theorem	oviec 6212*	Express an operation on equivalence classes of ordered pairs in terms of equivalence class of operations on ordered pairs. See iset.mm for additional comments describing the hypotheses. (Unnecessary distinct variable restrictions were removed by David Abernethy, 4-Jun-2013.) (Contributed by NM, 6-Aug-1995.) (Revised by Mario Carneiro, 4-Jun-2013.)
|- ( ( ( A e. S /\ B e. S ) /\ ( C e. S /\ D e. S ) ) -> H e. ( S X. S ) )   &    |- ( ( ( a e. S /\ b e. S ) /\ ( g e. S /\ h e. S ) ) -> K e. ( S X. S ) )   &    |- ( ( ( c e. S /\ d e. S ) /\ ( t e. S /\ s e. S ) ) -> L e. ( S X. S ) )   &    |- .~ e. _V   &    |- .~ Er ( S X. S )   &    |- .~ = { <. x , y >. | ( ( x e. ( S X. S ) /\ y e. ( S X. S ) ) /\ E. z E. w E. v E. u ( ( x = <. z , w >. /\ y = <. v , u >. ) /\ ph ) ) }   &    |- ( ( ( z = a /\ w = b ) /\ ( v = c /\ u = d ) ) -> ( ph <-> ps ) )   &    |- ( ( ( z = g /\ w = h ) /\ ( v = t /\ u = s ) ) -> ( ph <-> ch ) )   &    |- .+ = { <. <. x , y >. , z >. | ( ( x e. ( S X. S ) /\ y e. ( S X. S ) ) /\ E. w E. v E. u E. f ( ( x = <. w , v >. /\ y = <. u , f >. ) /\ z = J ) ) }   &    |- ( ( ( w = a /\ v = b ) /\ ( u = g /\ f = h ) ) -> J = K )   &    |- ( ( ( w = c /\ v = d ) /\ ( u = t /\ f = s ) ) -> J = L )   &    |- ( ( ( w = A /\ v = B ) /\ ( u = C /\ f = D ) ) -> J = H )   &    |- .+^ = { <. <. x , y >. , z >. | ( ( x e. Q /\ y e. Q ) /\ E. a E. b E. c E. d ( ( x = [ <. a , b >. ] .~ /\ y = [ <. c , d >. ] .~ ) /\ z = [ ( <. a , b >. .+ <. c , d >. ) ] .~ ) ) }   &    |- Q = ( ( S X. S ) /. .~ )   &    |- ( ( ( ( a e. S /\ b e. S ) /\ ( c e. S /\ d e. S ) ) /\ ( ( g e. S /\ h e. S ) /\ ( t e. S /\ s e. S ) ) ) -> ( ( ps /\ ch ) -> K .~ L ) )   =>    |- ( ( ( A e. S /\ B e. S ) /\ ( C e. S /\ D e. S ) ) -> ( [ <. A , B >. ] .~ .+^ [ <. C , D >. ] .~ ) = [ H ] .~ )
Theorem	ecovcom 6213*	Lemma used to transfer a commutative law via an equivalence relation. Most uses will want ecovicom 6214 instead. (Contributed by NM, 29-Aug-1995.) (Revised by David Abernethy, 4-Jun-2013.)
|- C = ( ( S X. S ) /. .~ )   &    |- ( ( ( x e. S /\ y e. S ) /\ ( z e. S /\ w e. S ) ) -> ( [ <. x , y >. ] .~ .+ [ <. z , w >. ] .~ ) = [ <. D , G >. ] .~ )   &    |- ( ( ( z e. S /\ w e. S ) /\ ( x e. S /\ y e. S ) ) -> ( [ <. z , w >. ] .~ .+ [ <. x , y >. ] .~ ) = [ <. H , J >. ] .~ )   &    |- D = H   &    |- G = J   =>    |- ( ( A e. C /\ B e. C ) -> ( A .+ B ) = ( B .+ A ) )
Theorem	ecovicom 6214*	Lemma used to transfer a commutative law via an equivalence relation. (Contributed by Jim Kingdon, 15-Sep-2019.)
|- C = ( ( S X. S ) /. .~ )   &    |- ( ( ( x e. S /\ y e. S ) /\ ( z e. S /\ w e. S ) ) -> ( [ <. x , y >. ] .~ .+ [ <. z , w >. ] .~ ) = [ <. D , G >. ] .~ )   &    |- ( ( ( z e. S /\ w e. S ) /\ ( x e. S /\ y e. S ) ) -> ( [ <. z , w >. ] .~ .+ [ <. x , y >. ] .~ ) = [ <. H , J >. ] .~ )   &    |- ( ( ( x e. S /\ y e. S ) /\ ( z e. S /\ w e. S ) ) -> D = H )   &    |- ( ( ( x e. S /\ y e. S ) /\ ( z e. S /\ w e. S ) ) -> G = J )   =>    |- ( ( A e. C /\ B e. C ) -> ( A .+ B ) = ( B .+ A ) )
Theorem	ecovass 6215*	Lemma used to transfer an associative law via an equivalence relation. In most cases ecoviass 6216 will be more useful. (Contributed by NM, 31-Aug-1995.) (Revised by David Abernethy, 4-Jun-2013.)
|- D = ( ( S X. S ) /. .~ )   &    |- ( ( ( x e. S /\ y e. S ) /\ ( z e. S /\ w e. S ) ) -> ( [ <. x , y >. ] .~ .+ [ <. z , w >. ] .~ ) = [ <. G , H >. ] .~ )   &    |- ( ( ( z e. S /\ w e. S ) /\ ( v e. S /\ u e. S ) ) -> ( [ <. z , w >. ] .~ .+ [ <. v , u >. ] .~ ) = [ <. N , Q >. ] .~ )   &    |- ( ( ( G e. S /\ H e. S ) /\ ( v e. S /\ u e. S ) ) -> ( [ <. G , H >. ] .~ .+ [ <. v , u >. ] .~ ) = [ <. J , K >. ] .~ )   &    |- ( ( ( x e. S /\ y e. S ) /\ ( N e. S /\ Q e. S ) ) -> ( [ <. x , y >. ] .~ .+ [ <. N , Q >. ] .~ ) = [ <. L , M >. ] .~ )   &    |- ( ( ( x e. S /\ y e. S ) /\ ( z e. S /\ w e. S ) ) -> ( G e. S /\ H e. S ) )   &    |- ( ( ( z e. S /\ w e. S ) /\ ( v e. S /\ u e. S ) ) -> ( N e. S /\ Q e. S ) )   &    |- J = L   &    |- K = M   =>    |- ( ( A e. D /\ B e. D /\ C e. D ) -> ( ( A .+ B ) .+ C ) = ( A .+ ( B .+ C ) ) )
Theorem	ecoviass 6216*	Lemma used to transfer an associative law via an equivalence relation. (Contributed by Jim Kingdon, 16-Sep-2019.)
|- D = ( ( S X. S ) /. .~ )   &    |- ( ( ( x e. S /\ y e. S ) /\ ( z e. S /\ w e. S ) ) -> ( [ <. x , y >. ] .~ .+ [ <. z , w >. ] .~ ) = [ <. G , H >. ] .~ )   &    |- ( ( ( z e. S /\ w e. S ) /\ ( v e. S /\ u e. S ) ) -> ( [ <. z , w >. ] .~ .+ [ <. v , u >. ] .~ ) = [ <. N , Q >. ] .~ )   &    |- ( ( ( G e. S /\ H e. S ) /\ ( v e. S /\ u e. S ) ) -> ( [ <. G , H >. ] .~ .+ [ <. v , u >. ] .~ ) = [ <. J , K >. ] .~ )   &    |- ( ( ( x e. S /\ y e. S ) /\ ( N e. S /\ Q e. S ) ) -> ( [ <. x , y >. ] .~ .+ [ <. N , Q >. ] .~ ) = [ <. L , M >. ] .~ )   &    |- ( ( ( x e. S /\ y e. S ) /\ ( z e. S /\ w e. S ) ) -> ( G e. S /\ H e. S ) )   &    |- ( ( ( z e. S /\ w e. S ) /\ ( v e. S /\ u e. S ) ) -> ( N e. S /\ Q e. S ) )   &    |- ( ( ( x e. S /\ y e. S ) /\ ( z e. S /\ w e. S ) /\ ( v e. S /\ u e. S ) ) -> J = L )   &    |- ( ( ( x e. S /\ y e. S ) /\ ( z e. S /\ w e. S ) /\ ( v e. S /\ u e. S ) ) -> K = M )   =>    |- ( ( A e. D /\ B e. D /\ C e. D ) -> ( ( A .+ B ) .+ C ) = ( A .+ ( B .+ C ) ) )
Theorem	ecovdi 6217*	Lemma used to transfer a distributive law via an equivalence relation. Most likely ecovidi 6218 will be more helpful. (Contributed by NM, 2-Sep-1995.) (Revised by David Abernethy, 4-Jun-2013.)
|- D = ( ( S X. S ) /. .~ )   &    |- ( ( ( z e. S /\ w e. S ) /\ ( v e. S /\ u e. S ) ) -> ( [ <. z , w >. ] .~ .+ [ <. v , u >. ] .~ ) = [ <. M , N >. ] .~ )   &    |- ( ( ( x e. S /\ y e. S ) /\ ( M e. S /\ N e. S ) ) -> ( [ <. x , y >. ] .~ .x. [ <. M , N >. ] .~ ) = [ <. H , J >. ] .~ )   &    |- ( ( ( x e. S /\ y e. S ) /\ ( z e. S /\ w e. S ) ) -> ( [ <. x , y >. ] .~ .x. [ <. z , w >. ] .~ ) = [ <. W , X >. ] .~ )   &    |- ( ( ( x e. S /\ y e. S ) /\ ( v e. S /\ u e. S ) ) -> ( [ <. x , y >. ] .~ .x. [ <. v , u >. ] .~ ) = [ <. Y , Z >. ] .~ )   &    |- ( ( ( W e. S /\ X e. S ) /\ ( Y e. S /\ Z e. S ) ) -> ( [ <. W , X >. ] .~ .+ [ <. Y , Z >. ] .~ ) = [ <. K , L >. ] .~ )   &    |- ( ( ( z e. S /\ w e. S ) /\ ( v e. S /\ u e. S ) ) -> ( M e. S /\ N e. S ) )   &    |- ( ( ( x e. S /\ y e. S ) /\ ( z e. S /\ w e. S ) ) -> ( W e. S /\ X e. S ) )   &    |- ( ( ( x e. S /\ y e. S ) /\ ( v e. S /\ u e. S ) ) -> ( Y e. S /\ Z e. S ) )   &    |- H = K   &    |- J = L   =>    |- ( ( A e. D /\ B e. D /\ C e. D ) -> ( A .x. ( B .+ C ) ) = ( ( A .x. B ) .+ ( A .x. C ) ) )
Theorem	ecovidi 6218*	Lemma used to transfer a distributive law via an equivalence relation. (Contributed by Jim Kingdon, 17-Sep-2019.)
|- D = ( ( S X. S ) /. .~ )   &    |- ( ( ( z e. S /\ w e. S ) /\ ( v e. S /\ u e. S ) ) -> ( [ <. z , w >. ] .~ .+ [ <. v , u >. ] .~ ) = [ <. M , N >. ] .~ )   &    |- ( ( ( x e. S /\ y e. S ) /\ ( M e. S /\ N e. S ) ) -> ( [ <. x , y >. ] .~ .x. [ <. M , N >. ] .~ ) = [ <. H , J >. ] .~ )   &    |- ( ( ( x e. S /\ y e. S ) /\ ( z e. S /\ w e. S ) ) -> ( [ <. x , y >. ] .~ .x. [ <. z , w >. ] .~ ) = [ <. W , X >. ] .~ )   &    |- ( ( ( x e. S /\ y e. S ) /\ ( v e. S /\ u e. S ) ) -> ( [ <. x , y >. ] .~ .x. [ <. v , u >. ] .~ ) = [ <. Y , Z >. ] .~ )   &    |- ( ( ( W e. S /\ X e. S ) /\ ( Y e. S /\ Z e. S ) ) -> ( [ <. W , X >. ] .~ .+ [ <. Y , Z >. ] .~ ) = [ <. K , L >. ] .~ )   &    |- ( ( ( z e. S /\ w e. S ) /\ ( v e. S /\ u e. S ) ) -> ( M e. S /\ N e. S ) )   &    |- ( ( ( x e. S /\ y e. S ) /\ ( z e. S /\ w e. S ) ) -> ( W e. S /\ X e. S ) )   &    |- ( ( ( x e. S /\ y e. S ) /\ ( v e. S /\ u e. S ) ) -> ( Y e. S /\ Z e. S ) )   &    |- ( ( ( x e. S /\ y e. S ) /\ ( z e. S /\ w e. S ) /\ ( v e. S /\ u e. S ) ) -> H = K )   &    |- ( ( ( x e. S /\ y e. S ) /\ ( z e. S /\ w e. S ) /\ ( v e. S /\ u e. S ) ) -> J = L )   =>    |- ( ( A e. D /\ B e. D /\ C e. D ) -> ( A .x. ( B .+ C ) ) = ( ( A .x. B ) .+ ( A .x. C ) ) )
2.6.25  Equinumerosity
Syntax	cen 6219	Extend class definition to include the equinumerosity relation ("approximately equals" symbol)
class ~~
Syntax	cdom 6220	Extend class definition to include the dominance relation (curly less-than-or-equal)
class ~<_
Syntax	cfn 6221	Extend class definition to include the class of all finite sets.
class Fin
Definition	df-en 6222*	Define the equinumerosity relation. Definition of [Enderton] p. 129. We define ~~ to be a binary relation rather than a connective, so its arguments must be sets to be meaningful. This is acceptable because we do not consider equinumerosity for proper classes. We derive the usual definition as bren 6228. (Contributed by NM, 28-Mar-1998.)
|- ~~ = { <. x , y >. | E. f f : x -1-1-onto-> y }
Definition	df-dom 6223*	Define the dominance relation. Compare Definition of [Enderton] p. 145. Typical textbook definitions are derived as brdom 6231 and domen 6232. (Contributed by NM, 28-Mar-1998.)
|- ~<_ = { <. x , y >. | E. f f : x -1-1-> y }
Definition	df-fin 6224*	Define the (proper) class of all finite sets. Similar to Definition 10.29 of [TakeutiZaring] p. 91, whose "Fin(a)" corresponds to our " a e. Fin". This definition is meaningful whether or not we accept the Axiom of Infinity ax-inf2 10101. (Contributed by NM, 22-Aug-2008.)
|- Fin = { x | E. y e. om x ~~ y }
Theorem	relen 6225	Equinumerosity is a relation. (Contributed by NM, 28-Mar-1998.)
|- Rel ~~
Theorem	reldom 6226	Dominance is a relation. (Contributed by NM, 28-Mar-1998.)
|- Rel ~<_
Theorem	encv 6227	If two classes are equinumerous, both classes are sets. (Contributed by AV, 21-Mar-2019.)
|- ( A ~~ B -> ( A e. _V /\ B e. _V ) )
Theorem	bren 6228*	Equinumerosity relation. (Contributed by NM, 15-Jun-1998.)
|- ( A ~~ B <-> E. f f : A -1-1-onto-> B )
Theorem	brdomg 6229*	Dominance relation. (Contributed by NM, 15-Jun-1998.)
|- ( B e. C -> ( A ~<_ B <-> E. f f : A -1-1-> B ) )
Theorem	brdomi 6230*	Dominance relation. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 26-Apr-2015.)
|- ( A ~<_ B -> E. f f : A -1-1-> B )
Theorem	brdom 6231*	Dominance relation. (Contributed by NM, 15-Jun-1998.)
|- B e. _V   =>    |- ( A ~<_ B <-> E. f f : A -1-1-> B )
Theorem	domen 6232*	Dominance in terms of equinumerosity. Example 1 of [Enderton] p. 146. (Contributed by NM, 15-Jun-1998.)
|- B e. _V   =>    |- ( A ~<_ B <-> E. x ( A ~~ x /\ x C_ B ) )
Theorem	domeng 6233*	Dominance in terms of equinumerosity, with the sethood requirement expressed as an antecedent. Example 1 of [Enderton] p. 146. (Contributed by NM, 24-Apr-2004.)
|- ( B e. C -> ( A ~<_ B <-> E. x ( A ~~ x /\ x C_ B ) ) )
Theorem	f1oen3g 6234	The domain and range of a one-to-one, onto function are equinumerous. This variation of f1oeng 6237 does not require the Axiom of Replacement. (Contributed by NM, 13-Jan-2007.) (Revised by Mario Carneiro, 10-Sep-2015.)
|- ( ( F e. V /\ F : A -1-1-onto-> B ) -> A ~~ B )
Theorem	f1oen2g 6235	The domain and range of a one-to-one, onto function are equinumerous. This variation of f1oeng 6237 does not require the Axiom of Replacement. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 10-Sep-2015.)
|- ( ( A e. V /\ B e. W /\ F : A -1-1-onto-> B ) -> A ~~ B )
Theorem	f1dom2g 6236	The domain of a one-to-one function is dominated by its codomain. This variation of f1domg 6238 does not require the Axiom of Replacement. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 24-Jun-2015.)
|- ( ( A e. V /\ B e. W /\ F : A -1-1-> B ) -> A ~<_ B )
Theorem	f1oeng 6237	The domain and range of a one-to-one, onto function are equinumerous. (Contributed by NM, 19-Jun-1998.)
|- ( ( A e. C /\ F : A -1-1-onto-> B ) -> A ~~ B )
Theorem	f1domg 6238	The domain of a one-to-one function is dominated by its codomain. (Contributed by NM, 4-Sep-2004.)
|- ( B e. C -> ( F : A -1-1-> B -> A ~<_ B ) )
Theorem	f1oen 6239	The domain and range of a one-to-one, onto function are equinumerous. (Contributed by NM, 19-Jun-1998.)
|- A e. _V   =>    |- ( F : A -1-1-onto-> B -> A ~~ B )
Theorem	f1dom 6240	The domain of a one-to-one function is dominated by its codomain. (Contributed by NM, 19-Jun-1998.)
|- B e. _V   =>    |- ( F : A -1-1-> B -> A ~<_ B )
Theorem	isfi 6241*	Express " A is finite." Definition 10.29 of [TakeutiZaring] p. 91 (whose " Fin " is a predicate instead of a class). (Contributed by NM, 22-Aug-2008.)
|- ( A e. Fin <-> E. x e. om A ~~ x )
Theorem	enssdom 6242	Equinumerosity implies dominance. (Contributed by NM, 31-Mar-1998.)
|- ~~ C_ ~<_
Theorem	endom 6243	Equinumerosity implies dominance. Theorem 15 of [Suppes] p. 94. (Contributed by NM, 28-May-1998.)
|- ( A ~~ B -> A ~<_ B )
Theorem	enrefg 6244	Equinumerosity is reflexive. Theorem 1 of [Suppes] p. 92. (Contributed by NM, 18-Jun-1998.) (Revised by Mario Carneiro, 26-Apr-2015.)
|- ( A e. V -> A ~~ A )
Theorem	enref 6245	Equinumerosity is reflexive. Theorem 1 of [Suppes] p. 92. (Contributed by NM, 25-Sep-2004.)
|- A e. _V   =>    |- A ~~ A
Theorem	eqeng 6246	Equality implies equinumerosity. (Contributed by NM, 26-Oct-2003.)
|- ( A e. V -> ( A = B -> A ~~ B ) )
Theorem	domrefg 6247	Dominance is reflexive. (Contributed by NM, 18-Jun-1998.)
|- ( A e. V -> A ~<_ A )
Theorem	en2d 6248*	Equinumerosity inference from an implicit one-to-one onto function. (Contributed by NM, 27-Jul-2004.) (Revised by Mario Carneiro, 12-May-2014.)
|- ( ph -> A e. _V )   &    |- ( ph -> B e. _V )   &    |- ( ph -> ( x e. A -> C e. _V ) )   &    |- ( ph -> ( y e. B -> D e. _V ) )   &    |- ( ph -> ( ( x e. A /\ y = C ) <-> ( y e. B /\ x = D ) ) )   =>    |- ( ph -> A ~~ B )
Theorem	en3d 6249*	Equinumerosity inference from an implicit one-to-one onto function. (Contributed by NM, 27-Jul-2004.) (Revised by Mario Carneiro, 12-May-2014.)
|- ( ph -> A e. _V )   &    |- ( ph -> B e. _V )   &    |- ( ph -> ( x e. A -> C e. B ) )   &    |- ( ph -> ( y e. B -> D e. A ) )   &    |- ( ph -> ( ( x e. A /\ y e. B ) -> ( x = D <-> y = C ) ) )   =>    |- ( ph -> A ~~ B )
Theorem	en2i 6250*	Equinumerosity inference from an implicit one-to-one onto function. (Contributed by NM, 4-Jan-2004.)
|- A e. _V   &    |- B e. _V   &    |- ( x e. A -> C e. _V )   &    |- ( y e. B -> D e. _V )   &    |- ( ( x e. A /\ y = C ) <-> ( y e. B /\ x = D ) )   =>    |- A ~~ B
Theorem	en3i 6251*	Equinumerosity inference from an implicit one-to-one onto function. (Contributed by NM, 19-Jul-2004.)
|- A e. _V   &    |- B e. _V   &    |- ( x e. A -> C e. B )   &    |- ( y e. B -> D e. A )   &    |- ( ( x e. A /\ y e. B ) -> ( x = D <-> y = C ) )   =>    |- A ~~ B
Theorem	dom2lem 6252*	A mapping (first hypothesis) that is one-to-one (second hypothesis) implies its domain is dominated by its codomain. (Contributed by NM, 24-Jul-2004.)
|- ( ph -> ( x e. A -> C e. B ) )   &    |- ( ph -> ( ( x e. A /\ y e. A ) -> ( C = D <-> x = y ) ) )   =>    |- ( ph -> ( x e. A |-> C ) : A -1-1-> B )
Theorem	dom2d 6253*	A mapping (first hypothesis) that is one-to-one (second hypothesis) implies its domain is dominated by its codomain. (Contributed by NM, 24-Jul-2004.) (Revised by Mario Carneiro, 20-May-2013.)
|- ( ph -> ( x e. A -> C e. B ) )   &    |- ( ph -> ( ( x e. A /\ y e. A ) -> ( C = D <-> x = y ) ) )   =>    |- ( ph -> ( B e. R -> A ~<_ B ) )
Theorem	dom3d 6254*	A mapping (first hypothesis) that is one-to-one (second hypothesis) implies its domain is dominated by its codomain. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 20-May-2013.)
|- ( ph -> ( x e. A -> C e. B ) )   &    |- ( ph -> ( ( x e. A /\ y e. A ) -> ( C = D <-> x = y ) ) )   &    |- ( ph -> A e. V )   &    |- ( ph -> B e. W )   =>    |- ( ph -> A ~<_ B )
Theorem	dom2 6255*	A mapping (first hypothesis) that is one-to-one (second hypothesis) implies its domain is dominated by its codomain. C and D can be read C ( x ) and D ( y ), as can be inferred from their distinct variable conditions. (Contributed by NM, 26-Oct-2003.)
|- ( x e. A -> C e. B )   &    |- ( ( x e. A /\ y e. A ) -> ( C = D <-> x = y ) )   =>    |- ( B e. V -> A ~<_ B )
Theorem	dom3 6256*	A mapping (first hypothesis) that is one-to-one (second hypothesis) implies its domain is dominated by its codomain. C and D can be read C ( x ) and D ( y ), as can be inferred from their distinct variable conditions. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 20-May-2013.)
|- ( x e. A -> C e. B )   &    |- ( ( x e. A /\ y e. A ) -> ( C = D <-> x = y ) )   =>    |- ( ( A e. V /\ B e. W ) -> A ~<_ B )
Theorem	idssen 6257	Equality implies equinumerosity. (Contributed by NM, 30-Apr-1998.) (Revised by Mario Carneiro, 15-Nov-2014.)
|- _I C_ ~~
Theorem	ssdomg 6258	A set dominates its subsets. Theorem 16 of [Suppes] p. 94. (Contributed by NM, 19-Jun-1998.) (Revised by Mario Carneiro, 24-Jun-2015.)
|- ( B e. V -> ( A C_ B -> A ~<_ B ) )
Theorem	ener 6259	Equinumerosity is an equivalence relation. (Contributed by NM, 19-Mar-1998.) (Revised by Mario Carneiro, 15-Nov-2014.)
|- ~~ Er _V
Theorem	ensymb 6260	Symmetry of equinumerosity. Theorem 2 of [Suppes] p. 92. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 26-Apr-2015.)
|- ( A ~~ B <-> B ~~ A )
Theorem	ensym 6261	Symmetry of equinumerosity. Theorem 2 of [Suppes] p. 92. (Contributed by NM, 26-Oct-2003.) (Revised by Mario Carneiro, 26-Apr-2015.)
|- ( A ~~ B -> B ~~ A )
Theorem	ensymi 6262	Symmetry of equinumerosity. Theorem 2 of [Suppes] p. 92. (Contributed by NM, 25-Sep-2004.)
|- A ~~ B   =>    |- B ~~ A
Theorem	ensymd 6263	Symmetry of equinumerosity. Deduction form of ensym 6261. (Contributed by David Moews, 1-May-2017.)
|- ( ph -> A ~~ B )   =>    |- ( ph -> B ~~ A )
Theorem	entr 6264	Transitivity of equinumerosity. Theorem 3 of [Suppes] p. 92. (Contributed by NM, 9-Jun-1998.)
|- ( ( A ~~ B /\ B ~~ C ) -> A ~~ C )
Theorem	domtr 6265	Transitivity of dominance relation. Theorem 17 of [Suppes] p. 94. (Contributed by NM, 4-Jun-1998.) (Revised by Mario Carneiro, 15-Nov-2014.)
|- ( ( A ~<_ B /\ B ~<_ C ) -> A ~<_ C )
Theorem	entri 6266	A chained equinumerosity inference. (Contributed by NM, 25-Sep-2004.)
|- A ~~ B   &    |- B ~~ C   =>    |- A ~~ C
Theorem	entr2i 6267	A chained equinumerosity inference. (Contributed by NM, 25-Sep-2004.)
|- A ~~ B   &    |- B ~~ C   =>    |- C ~~ A
Theorem	entr3i 6268	A chained equinumerosity inference. (Contributed by NM, 25-Sep-2004.)
|- A ~~ B   &    |- A ~~ C   =>    |- B ~~ C
Theorem	entr4i 6269	A chained equinumerosity inference. (Contributed by NM, 25-Sep-2004.)
|- A ~~ B   &    |- C ~~ B   =>    |- A ~~ C
Theorem	endomtr 6270	Transitivity of equinumerosity and dominance. (Contributed by NM, 7-Jun-1998.)
|- ( ( A ~~ B /\ B ~<_ C ) -> A ~<_ C )
Theorem	domentr 6271	Transitivity of dominance and equinumerosity. (Contributed by NM, 7-Jun-1998.)
|- ( ( A ~<_ B /\ B ~~ C ) -> A ~<_ C )
Theorem	f1imaeng 6272	A one-to-one function's image under a subset of its domain is equinumerous to the subset. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 15-May-2015.)
|- ( ( F : A -1-1-> B /\ C C_ A /\ C e. V ) -> ( F " C ) ~~ C )
Theorem	f1imaen2g 6273	A one-to-one function's image under a subset of its domain is equinumerous to the subset. (This version of f1imaen 6274 does not need ax-setind 4262.) (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 16-Nov-2014.) (Revised by Mario Carneiro, 25-Jun-2015.)
|- ( ( ( F : A -1-1-> B /\ B e. V ) /\ ( C C_ A /\ C e. V ) ) -> ( F " C ) ~~ C )
Theorem	f1imaen 6274	A one-to-one function's image under a subset of its domain is equinumerous to the subset. (Contributed by NM, 30-Sep-2004.)
|- C e. _V   =>    |- ( ( F : A -1-1-> B /\ C C_ A ) -> ( F " C ) ~~ C )
Theorem	en0 6275	The empty set is equinumerous only to itself. Exercise 1 of [TakeutiZaring] p. 88. (Contributed by NM, 27-May-1998.)
|- ( A ~~ (/) <-> A = (/) )
Theorem	ensn1 6276	A singleton is equinumerous to ordinal one. (Contributed by NM, 4-Nov-2002.)
|- A e. _V   =>    |- { A } ~~ 1o
Theorem	ensn1g 6277	A singleton is equinumerous to ordinal one. (Contributed by NM, 23-Apr-2004.)
|- ( A e. V -> { A } ~~ 1o )
Theorem	enpr1g 6278	{ A , A } has only one element. (Contributed by FL, 15-Feb-2010.)
|- ( A e. V -> { A , A } ~~ 1o )
Theorem	en1 6279*	A set is equinumerous to ordinal one iff it is a singleton. (Contributed by NM, 25-Jul-2004.)
|- ( A ~~ 1o <-> E. x A = { x } )
Theorem	en1bg 6280	A set is equinumerous to ordinal one iff it is a singleton. (Contributed by Jim Kingdon, 13-Apr-2020.)
|- ( A e. V -> ( A ~~ 1o <-> A = { U. A } ) )
Theorem	reuen1 6281*	Two ways to express "exactly one". (Contributed by Stefan O'Rear, 28-Oct-2014.)
|- ( E! x e. A ph <-> { x e. A | ph } ~~ 1o )
Theorem	euen1 6282	Two ways to express "exactly one". (Contributed by Stefan O'Rear, 28-Oct-2014.)
|- ( E! x ph <-> { x | ph } ~~ 1o )
Theorem	euen1b 6283*	Two ways to express " A has a unique element". (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 9-Apr-2015.)
|- ( A ~~ 1o <-> E! x x e. A )
Theorem	en1uniel 6284	A singleton contains its sole element. (Contributed by Stefan O'Rear, 16-Aug-2015.)
|- ( S ~~ 1o -> U. S e. S )
Theorem	2dom 6285*	A set that dominates ordinal 2 has at least 2 different members. (Contributed by NM, 25-Jul-2004.)
|- ( 2o ~<_ A -> E. x e. A E. y e. A -. x = y )
Theorem	fundmen 6286	A function is equinumerous to its domain. Exercise 4 of [Suppes] p. 98. (Contributed by NM, 28-Jul-2004.) (Revised by Mario Carneiro, 15-Nov-2014.)
|- F e. _V   =>    |- ( Fun F -> dom F ~~ F )
Theorem	fundmeng 6287	A function is equinumerous to its domain. Exercise 4 of [Suppes] p. 98. (Contributed by NM, 17-Sep-2013.)
|- ( ( F e. V /\ Fun F ) -> dom F ~~ F )
Theorem	cnven 6288	A relational set is equinumerous to its converse. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 28-Dec-2014.)
|- ( ( Rel A /\ A e. V ) -> A ~~ `' A )
Theorem	fndmeng 6289	A function is equinumerate to its domain. (Contributed by Paul Chapman, 22-Jun-2011.)
|- ( ( F Fn A /\ A e. C ) -> A ~~ F )
Theorem	en2sn 6290	Two singletons are equinumerous. (Contributed by NM, 9-Nov-2003.)
|- ( ( A e. C /\ B e. D ) -> { A } ~~ { B } )
Theorem	snfig 6291	A singleton is finite. (Contributed by Jim Kingdon, 13-Apr-2020.)
|- ( A e. V -> { A } e. Fin )
Theorem	fiprc 6292	The class of finite sets is a proper class. (Contributed by Jeff Hankins, 3-Oct-2008.)
|- Fin e/ _V
Theorem	unen 6293	Equinumerosity of union of disjoint sets. Theorem 4 of [Suppes] p. 92. (Contributed by NM, 11-Jun-1998.) (Revised by Mario Carneiro, 26-Apr-2015.)
|- ( ( ( A ~~ B /\ C ~~ D ) /\ ( ( A i^i C ) = (/) /\ ( B i^i D ) = (/) ) ) -> ( A u. C ) ~~ ( B u. D ) )
Theorem	enm 6294*	A set equinumerous to an inhabited set is inhabited. (Contributed by Jim Kingdon, 19-May-2020.)
|- ( ( A ~~ B /\ E. x x e. A ) -> E. y y e. B )
Theorem	xpsnen 6295	A set is equinumerous to its Cartesian product with a singleton. Proposition 4.22(c) of [Mendelson] p. 254. (Contributed by NM, 4-Jan-2004.) (Revised by Mario Carneiro, 15-Nov-2014.)
|- A e. _V   &    |- B e. _V   =>    |- ( A X. { B } ) ~~ A
Theorem	xpsneng 6296	A set is equinumerous to its Cartesian product with a singleton. Proposition 4.22(c) of [Mendelson] p. 254. (Contributed by NM, 22-Oct-2004.)
|- ( ( A e. V /\ B e. W ) -> ( A X. { B } ) ~~ A )
Theorem	xp1en 6297	One times a cardinal number. (Contributed by NM, 27-Sep-2004.) (Revised by Mario Carneiro, 29-Apr-2015.)
|- ( A e. V -> ( A X. 1o ) ~~ A )
Theorem	endisj 6298*	Any two sets are equinumerous to disjoint sets. Exercise 4.39 of [Mendelson] p. 255. (Contributed by NM, 16-Apr-2004.)
|- A e. _V   &    |- B e. _V   =>    |- E. x E. y ( ( x ~~ A /\ y ~~ B ) /\ ( x i^i y ) = (/) )
Theorem	xpcomf1o 6299*	The canonical bijection from ( A X. B ) to ( B X. A ). (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 23-Apr-2014.)
|- F = ( x e. ( A X. B ) |-> U. `' { x } )   =>    |- F : ( A X. B ) -1-1-onto-> ( B X. A )
Theorem	xpcomco 6300*	Composition with the bijection of xpcomf1o 6299 swaps the arguments to a mapping. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 30-May-2015.)
|- F = ( x e. ( A X. B ) |-> U. `' { x } )   &    |- G = ( y e. B , z e. A |-> C )   =>    |- ( G o. F ) = ( z e. A , y e. B |-> C )